rasta-smoker

Panama

To the Kewl Links forum.

__________________
"This fight against the War on Drugs is not a war in the classic sense of the word, so it's virtually impossible to point to one instance and say, 'That was the battle that stemmed the tide in our favor'. We have had many small victories that have led us to where we are and each day we continue to communicate and educate brings us that much closer to our ultimate goal: The end of marijuana prohibition." -Richard "Panama" Red-
Marijuana.Com Posting Guideline

Bakednfried

nice link man

If I was in the US I would probably vote for that party...

__________________
P0t PoT p0t P0T pot
-------------------------

DailyTripper

thats one nice flyer... maybe i should vote libertarian.. wait.. i cant vote.. ohwell..

__________________
Take a trip.

ncj

supposedly, there are 20 million weed smokers in the US. if these people get out and vote, they can make a difference.

__________________
Instead of war on poverty, they got a war on drugs so the police can bother me.

-R.I.P. Tupac Shakur

WNB

I'm a libertarian

However, the libertarian party is so 'fringe' that it makes more sense to vote for Republicans and Democrats with some libertarian ideals.

__________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

Lothar121

I am libertarian as well, would be in my sig if they didn't edit that stuff. Anyways, the Libertarian Party is the only one that had endorsed legalizing marijuana. Neither the republicans or democrats have done so.

My first election, I am prould to say I voted Libertarian across the board.

You say I'm wasting my vote? I say you're wasting your vote on the republicans and democrats. Your ONE vote isn't doing jack **** anyways, might as well send a message.

__________________

Donate. Write. Make a difference.. Posting Guidelines | Marijuana Policy Project | NORML | DPA | Drug WarRant | Media Awareness Project

imported_teufelfisch

That's not necessarily true. Gore lost because of the Green Party.

I believe that a long recurrence of Republican leadership is set for the future. The reason? The generally more liberal side of the government is split three ways - Democrat, Green, and Liberatarian.

Eh, but then again, maybe Bush has lost enough support with his silly wars that the Democrats have a chance of winning the next election.

Myself, I'm registered as independent.

I'll probably vote a mostly Green ticket, even though it's taking away from more viable Democratic candidates.

__________________
Everything's heavy underground.

J05H

I voted for Nader last year. Gore won my state in 2000 by 10 %, but in 2002 the republicans won all of the major elections, I was sick to my stomach the entire next day. I want to vote for who I really would like to win and not choose between the republican or democrat. In 2004 if the polls are close I'm going to vote for the democratic candidate, Its sad, but Bush is evil and he must be stopped. If the democratic candidate is ahead by quite a few points in the polls I'm going to vote for the green or libertarian candidate. I am going to vote in the democratic primary for the first time, and have a part in picking the democratic candidate, instead of just having one chosen for me. I think I'll vote in the republican primary in 2008. John McCain should have been the republican nominee in 2000. If people voted in the primaries we wouldn't have to choose between people like Bush and Gore.

WNB

I'll be voting across the board democrat.

In the last elections in my state (November 2002) I had just turned 18. Along with alot of other high school kids, I voted green. A republican (Norm Coleman) beat a democrat (Walter Mondale) in an extremely narrow election. After that, I'll never vote for third parties again.

Even if I agree with libertarians and greens more than democrats, dems are the only ones with a chance at winning an election.