Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-04-2008, 12:44 PM   #1
Lit_Match
Moderator
 
Lit_Match's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,514
Grams: 21,156.33
Groans: 1
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Lit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation God
Thanks: 144
Thanked 694 Times in 401 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default CA: Mendocino County Won't Enforce Pot Measure

Mendocino County Won't Enforce Pot Measure
06-03-08|The Press Democrat|By Mike Geniella

Mendocino County's top law enforcement officials announced Wednesday they won't be enforcing a voter-approved crackdown on medical marijuana cultivation.

Citing pending legal challenges to local and state-approved limits, the Sheriff's Office and district attorney said they will temporarily not enforce the plant limits set forth in Measure B.

Instead county law enforcement will continue to allow possession and cultivation of 25 plants. However, in a change of policy, the county limit will apply to the number of plants on a parcel, and not simply the number grown for an individual's use.

The twist is provided in a marijuana ordinance approved by the Board of Supervisors. It also bans growing of marijuana for any reason within 1,000 feet of a school, school bus stop, church, youth-oriented facility or a park.

In effect, county officials said they believe the property standard is independent of the legal issues surrounding individual plant limits.

Medical marijuana advocates are challenging any individual limits on possession, citing Prop. 215, a 1996 statewide initiative that decriminalized marijuana use for medicinal purposes. They contend the initiative didn't specify numbers, stating only that medical marijuana use should be "reasonable" depending on a patient's need.

The decision not to enforce Measure B guidelines stems from a local Superior Court case, which challenges the new limits. It cites a May state appellate court ruling that found state guidelines, which Measure B adopted, were unconstitutional.

Whether state officials plan to challenge the appellate court ruling to the state Supreme Court remains undecided.

While state and local officials struggle with implementing medical marijuana guidelines, federal authorities refuse to recognize their authority. Under federal law, marijuana cultivation and possession for any reason is illegal.
__________________
Donation links to NORML (The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws) | MPP (Marijuana Policy Project)



Lit_Match is offline Award Lit_Match Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lit_Match For This Useful Post:
Vicki (07-04-2008)
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:41 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52