Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
Register FAQ Gaming Financials Radio Stations VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-20-2004, 08:44 PM   #1
Mamabudz
 

Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Grams: 0 [Check]

Stock Portfolio
Total Value:
Gain/Loss: %
Default Why Be Limited To Athletes?

DRUG-TESTING PLAN CONCERNS OFFICIAL
Source: The Ledger | Pubdate: Fri, 20 Feb 2004
Author: Andrew Dunn


School Board Member Questions Why It Should Be Limited To Athletes.

LAKELAND -- Polk County School Board member Brenda Reddout said she has
a number of concerns with a proposal to randomly drug test student athletes.

"There is a risk the district runs," she said. "We know that there are students who use drugs. We know that there are students in extracurricular activities beyond sports that use drugs. If we are going to do a program like this, why isn't it inclusive of all extracurricular activities?"

The policy is in response to a federal grant program that the School District plans to implement this fall. Student athletes at more than a dozen high schools, including one private school, would be randomly tested for recreational drugs.

A similar program was piloted at George Jenkins High School in Lakeland during the 1990s. The program ended during the 19992000 school year because of a lack of funds. Then-Principal David Lauer has said that program was very successful and reduced drug use.

Reddout said the district is assuming that athletes have much more influence on other students than they actually might have. And she said there's no empirical data that shows athletes have any higher drug use than other students.

She also had a concern that the punishments, such as removing a student from a school team, lie solely in the hands of the principal. The policy doesn't allow for further administrative appeal. She said such a punishment can be a much bigger deal than just suspending a student for five or 10 days.

"Being kicked off a team can be a life-altering experience, particularly for those kids who are tracked in such a way that they may actually get scholarship money to go on to higher learning," she said.

The drug-testing policy is not set in stone. Parents and even students still have a chance to voice their opinions on the matter.

"It will be on the agenda for a public hearing in the March 16 meeting," said board chairman Jack English.

Copyright: 2004 The Ledger
Contact: voice@theledger.com
Award Mamabudz Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 02-21-2004, 01:19 PM   #2
xxdr_zombiexx
Blogger
 
xxdr_zombiexx's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,089
Diggs: 0
Grams: 2608.31999999997 [Check]
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
xxdr_zombiexx is starting to make a name for themself
Thanks: 16
Thanked 33 Times in 14 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

"It all started on September 15, 1986, when President Reagan signed Executive Order 12564 in an attempt to establish a drug-free Federal workplace."

Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988

The elimination of marijuana, marijuana use, marijuana advocacy, and as much resistance to unreseanoble search and siezure is SO important that these people have a goal of regular drug testing for the general american population.

Its awesome from crony profiteering AND furthers the war against marijuana, because drug testing was created to harrass pot smokers. They are working on conditioning americans to simply accept this and all sorts of other intrusions.

Quote:
From: Here

Thirty, or one-hundred years ago, asking an employee to submit a urine sample as a condition of continued employment would be unbelievable and most certainly it would be considered an invasion of the employee’s privacy. Today, such testing is so commonplace that it generates almost no opposition. The Wall Street Journal reported that about 90% of Fortune 200 companies have drug-testing programs. Society now readily tolerates what would have been considered an invasion of privacy. The remarkable aspect about employment drug and alcohol testing is how acceptable it has become in such a short period of time.
Quote:
From: Here

If drug testing does not effectively improve workplace safety, why do employers so often make the case that it does? The reason lies in the nature of the power dynamic between the testers (management) and the tested (workers).

Drug testing shifts responsibility for workplace testing from management, which controls the work environment and structure of work, to the individual employees.2 This truth explains the otherwise highly ironic pro-testing posturing of Presidents Reagan and Bush during the 1980's. Both these presidents acted aggressively to reduce the power of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the federal agency that oversees workplace safety, while simultaneously creating regulations and laws that require drug testing to improve workplace safety. By implementing drug testing, employers and social conservatives are able to blame American workers for workplace accidents and productivity problems. Drug testing and the political rhetoric that surrounds it shift responsibility for those problems away from management (who control the work environment, the amount of safety training, pace of work, etc), to individual workers' actions.
First DARE and now ever-spreading drug testing, which provides massive profits for the companies who do this testing. These laws make drug testing a growth industry.

And, of course, this is a reason cited by the DEA that they need to ban hemp foods, tokeep people from claiming false positive...and not being totally tuined by the legal consequences they live to shower on people.
__________________
Alien Space Signal

There's no money for your issue so long as we're squandering $50 billion a year on the DrugWar. Ben Masel

Fear became the ultimate tool of this government - V.
xxdr_zombiexx is offline Award xxdr_zombiexx Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2004, 02:27 PM   #3
rick
Developer/Admin
 
rick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,257
Diggs: 0
Grams: 37391.2099999998 [Check]
Groans: 3
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
rick has a reputation beyond reputerick has a reputation beyond reputerick has a reputation beyond reputerick has a reputation beyond reputerick has a reputation beyond reputerick has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks: 158
Thanked 264 Times in 96 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: -1.000%
Default

Quote:
"There is a risk the district runs," she said. "We know that there are students who use drugs. We know that there are students in extracurricular activities beyond sports that use drugs. If we are going to do a program like this, why isn't it inclusive of all extracurricular activities?"
This really simplifies the prohibitionist's mission to a single statement. If they can invade one privacy, why cant they invade another? It's all about protecting the children and most accept that...but where does this logic end? At your office? At the bus stop? In your bathroom?

My children will not be exposed to drug testing.
rick is offline Award rick Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 11:00 AM   #4
Higher Self
 

Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Grams: [Check]

Stock Portfolio
Total Value:
Gain/Loss: %
Default Turnabouts fair play

What if there was mandatory drug testing for every elected official, at the federal and state level?

Too bad we have not created a way to have voter approved federal initiatives, just like state initiatives, that bypass the legislative houses, that more acurately reflect the will of the people, not special interest.


Does anyone know the reprecussions of drug testing in states that have medical marijuana laws?
Award Higher Self Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 11:51 PM   #5
Mamabudz
 

Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Grams: [Check]

Stock Portfolio
Total Value:
Gain/Loss: %
Default

"Does anyone know the reprecussions of drug testing in states that have medical marijuana laws?"

Now there is a good question...

I know that www.NORML.org has a breakdown of all the laws by state, it would be a matter of reviewing the specific states that have MMJ

...have a cookie and be sure to tell us your results if you do it!

Mama Budz
Award Mamabudz Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CA: Another California town moves to ban medical marijuana distributors WNB The Drug War Headline News 0 08-03-2005 09:20 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53