| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Hot Products! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Seasoned Activist ![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,079
Grams: 5,596.60 Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
| Lawsuit filed on drug ads on transit SF Gate |Thursday, February 19, 2004 Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer begelko@sfchronicle.com Civil liberties and medical marijuana advocates sued Wednesday to overturn a new, little-noticed federal law cutting off funds for any public transit agency that runs ads calling for the legalization or medical use of any illegal drug. The suit, filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., will be followed by similar challenges in San Francisco and other cities, unless the law is struck down, said Joseph White, executive director of a group called Change the Climate. A congressman's displeasure at the group's marijuana ads in the D.C. transit system gave rise to the law. "There is no community that has more money at stake than the San Francisco Bay Area,'' White said. He noted that the $3.1 billion measure includes $100 million for the already completed BART airport extension and $9 million for the Municipal Railway's Third Street light rail project in San Francisco, money those transit systems would forfeit if they accepted a forbidden ad. "The government does not want the public to know how badly our drug policy has failed, so it is trying to silence Americans who oppose the war on drugs,'' said Graham Boyd, the American Civil Liberties Union's chief litigator on drug issues and a lawyer in the lawsuit filed Wednesday. BART spokesman Mike Healy said no one has tried to buy pro-marijuana ads in its trains or stations. He called the new funding law "blackmail of the transit industry'' and predicted it would be ruled unconstitutional. The suit claims the law, which took effect Feb. 1, violates the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech. The law's sponsor, Rep. Ernest Istook, R-Okla., reacted angrily. "We will spend over $12 billion this year to discourage illegal drug use. It makes no sense to use federal dollars or federal property to undercut that effort,'' he said in a statement. It makes no sense to use taxpayer money to tell taxpayers lies either!
__________________ |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CA: Another California town moves to ban medical marijuana distributors | WNB | The Drug War Headline News | 0 | 08-03-2005 10:20 AM |
| HEre's a Question. | mupto | Urine Testing | 1 | 05-26-2005 01:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |