| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Activist Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 423
Grams: 2,309.65 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Random drug test ban OK'd By ERIC STERN | BEE CAPITOL BUREAU | June 24, 2004 SACRAMENTO -- Bret Harte Union High School in Angels Camp probably will stop testing student-athletes for drugs if a legislative effort to ban random checks becomes law, Superintendent Joseph Wilimek said Wednesday. Senate Bill 1386 would allow a test only if there is "reasonable suspicion" that a student is using drugs. The measure advanced out of the Assembly Education Committee on Wednesday and is close to reaching Gov. Schwarzenegger's desk. The measure needs final approval from the full Assembly; the Senate already passed it. Wilimek, whose Calaveras County high school is the only one in the Northern San Joaquin Valley and foothills with a random drug-testing program, said the bill would open up too many legal and public relations challenges if a student is wrongly singled out for a drug test. Random tests are more fair, he said. "I'm not sure that we have the ability to say this kid is on (drugs) and this kid isn't," he said. "We're going to get accused of all kinds of other things." But Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg, D-Los Angeles, who co-wrote the bill, said it's easy to spot drug use. "You come into class, your eyes are red, you're falling asleep, you're slurring your speech, you can't stand up when the bell rings, and yesterday you weren't like that," said Goldberg, a former high school teacher. "Reasonable suspicion" is defined in the bill as "rational inferences" not based on "curiosity, rumor or hunch." Under the bill, schools also could not target students for drug tests because of race, gender, sexual orientation, or suspicion of drug use among friends or family members. Random drug testing, while not widespread in California schools, is a practice that has been upheld by U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Sen. John Vasconcellos, D-Santa Clara, who co-wrote the bill, said state guidelines need to be in place to protect students' privacy and integrity. Bret Harte's random-testing program for athletes and cheerleaders has been in existence for a year. Wilimek wants it to continue, calling the program a deterrent against drug use. Transgressors get counseling Five of the 532 students tested had positive results, mostly for marijuana, Wilimek said. The students were not disciplined. Instead, they attended off-campus drug counseling sessions, then passed a subsequent drug test, he said. But the idea has not gained much momentum elsewhere, even in Modesto schools, where more than 40 students were swept up in an April drug bust. "Right now, that isn't something we're looking at seriously," said Marlin Sumpter, Modesto City Schools director of child welfare and attendance. He said there are concerns about balancing the privacy of all students while trying to track down only a few drug users. Attorney General Bill Lockyer echoed that concern Wednesday, saying random drug testing is "used to step on young people's personal freedom." He supports Goldberg's bill. President Bush, who has set aside $25 million in his proposed budget to encourage schools to adopt random drug-testing programs, dispatched his deputy drug czar to try to fend off Goldberg's legislation. [Greenbudnote: Send in the clowns.] Andrea Barthwell, deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, said the "reasonable suspicion" standard doesn't work because drug users learn how to hide their behavior. Random testing exposes it, and the risk of getting caught is enough for students to stand up to "intense pressure" from other students, she said. Bee Capitol Bureau reporter Eric Stern can be reached at 916-326-5544 or estern@modbee.com.
__________________ "I believe in the near future, the government will use anti-drug hysteria to set up a police state." -author William S. Burroughs, 1947 |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 |
| Seasoned Activist ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,161
Grams: 2,305.85 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| I think more important than the fact that it infringes on the rights of the students is the fact that it discourages them from participating in sports and other extracurricular activities. My high school had a similar program when I was there, and I know a few of my friends didn't play sports simply because of the drug testing. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 159
Grams: 1,241.15 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Kanni Note: This is a clip from an article relating to the modesto drug busts. Some of the files were shocking, Chin said: "They were selling some of these drugs two (pills) for $1. How cheap is that? We can't have this on campus. … It's scary." Police said officers bought cocaine, methamphetamine and prescription drugs from students, although marijuana sales led to most of the arrests. While not regarded as a "hard" drug like cocaine or meth, "Marijuana leads to other things," said police Sgt. Ron Cloward, head of the department's drug task force. "People think it's harmless, and pretty soon they're doing heroin." The entire article can be found here: http://www.modbee.com/local/story/86...-9569960c.html As for the article above.. Wilimek, whose Calaveras County high school is the only one in the Northern San Joaquin Valley and foothills with a random drug-testing program, said the bill would open up too many legal and public relations challenges if a student is wrongly singled out for a drug test. Random tests are more fair, he said. Let me see,he doesn't want the responsibilty of having to identify the drug users then the liability of possibly being wrong and left open for a lawsuit. So that makes it a better idea to lump all the students as suspected drug users knowing full well that most if not all of them will be clean but not singling anyone out covers their asses. Do I have that right? Five of the 532 students tested had positive results, mostly for marijuana, Wilimek said. So what is mostly out of 5?
__________________ Keep the wall of reality and fantasy high enough not to fall over but low enough to see the other side. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Activist Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 418
Grams: 2,388.45 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
I am also suprised that only 5/532 students tested positive, I'd be excstatic if i were a LEO. Hey, less than 5 percent of the kids tested positive for anything! BE SATISFIED! PS Gov. Schwarzenegger Priceless
__________________ Life is like a pot of stew, if you don't stir it up every once and a while, all the scum rises to the top -Still Life with Woodpecker by Tom Robbins. | |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fox News (Officially) Abandons Journalism in the Middle East | Higher Logic | Politics | 10 | 08-30-2006 05:58 PM |
| which vaporizer? | poochoo | Vaporizers | 4 | 08-01-2006 03:39 AM |
| Marijuana as Medicine: Politicians decide? | xxdr_zombiexx | The Drug War Headline News | 2 | 02-19-2004 11:47 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |