Marijuana.com

Greenbud

The Ultimate Anti-Drug

By David Borden |AlterNet | August 10, 2004.


Biotech corporations are formulating the drug to end all drugs – a vaccine against the 'disease' of drug-induced euphoria.

A government-convened panel of scientists in the UK is considering what the Independent properly termed "a radical scheme" – a proposal to use vaccines, currently under development by pharmaceutical corporations, to immunize children against "euphoria" from drugs such as heroin, cocaine and nicotine. Panel members say the plan would target children who are at risk of becoming drug users in the future. They have not said how it would be determined who is at risk.

It's only a matter of time until some of our own drug war zealots or anti-drug mad scientists take the idea up here in the US, no matter how dangerous and immoral it is.

An anti-drug vaccine differs fundamentally from vaccines designed to protect individuals from diseases like measles, the example a committee member raised to the Independent's reporter. Measles is a disease that no one, or virtually no one, wants to catch, and which is communicable and could therefore spread to large numbers of people if unchecked. Perhaps measles vaccinations should not be compulsory, if we believe in freedom of choice. But the wisdom of such vaccinations is clear, and it's legitimate for society to encourage them and make them widely available.

An anti-drug vaccine, on the other hand, is designed to produce a permanent chemical alteration to an individual's brain chemistry to disable one's ability to experience certain mind states that humans are designed to be able to experience – and which despite their downsides many people desire to experience. Though heroin and cocaine are illegal, that might not always be the case, and nicotine is legal. Legal or not, it is the individual's human right to seek such experiences. But even if one disagrees with that last statement, to alter a human being's brain and body to make the experience impossible, forever, is an extremist approach.

The "side effects" of such an alteration are hard to predict. Heroin is an opiate drug that was developed for pain control, which is still used for pain control in some countries, and which is derived from morphine and hence fundamentally similar to many other pain medicines. Would a heroin vaccine interfere with the ability of a pain patient to gain relief through heroin or other opiate medications? Cocaine is also used as a medicine, not for such a large number of patients as the opiates, but important for the ones for whom it is used. Would a cocaine vaccine interfere with a patient's ability to gain those medical benefits? Would it interfere with the potency of similar drugs like novocaine? Does nicotine have current or potential medical uses that would be stymied by a vaccine?

Not necessarily – the physiological processes occurring in pain relief are not identical to those involved in opiate use to produce, euphoria, for example, or for relieving the cravings of an addiction. Nor, however, are they entirely dissimilar – it's the same substance, after all. How can we determine in advance, with surety, that no such problems will arise? Through experimentation? On children? It's true that experimental drug trials are an accepted part of medical research, and some may even by necessity involve children as test subjects.

But the anti-drug vaccine is a fundamentally different proposition in this respect as well, for at least two reasons. One is that it is not necessary, as effective alternatives for reducing or avoiding the harms that sometimes from drug addiction are already available – moderation, harm reduction, and abstinence. The other reason is the sheer scale, in time and in numbers of people, that would be needed to thoroughly assess an anti-drug vaccine's risks and effects. It's not something that can be accomplished in one or even ten years, with any reasonable number of people, because it's not sufficient to inject a test set of children with the vaccine and then feed them addictive drugs years later to see what happens.

Take the number of people needed for a proper drug trial. Then divide that by the fraction of them who statistically are likely to suffer from serious medical conditions in the future that require with opiates (a larger number) or cocaine (a smaller number). That much larger number of test subjects is the minimum number needed to ensure that the subset of the test subjects who will develop severe chronic pain and other serious conditions in the future will be available and still part of the study. There would need to be an ample number of them requiring heavy use of opiates. And the time scale is a lifetime, as the subjects would receive the vaccinations as children while the drugs are most often needed as medicines late in life.

We're not talking thousands of test subjects, nor tens of thousands. We are talking about at least hundreds of thousands and probably millions or more – a substantial chunk of a generation – with statistically significant results not possible for the better part of a century, to determine with any degree of confidence that such vaccines will not interfere with important medical treatments later in life.

If informed, consenting adults want to take an anti-drug vaccine, and if it could work on adults, maybe they should have that right. But the government should play no role in sponsoring, nor even encouraging, such a practice. An anti-drug vaccine for children is such a bad idea that it isn't even worth considering.

David Borden is executive director of DRCnet.

__________________
"I believe in the near future, the government will use anti-drug hysteria to set up a police state."
-author William S. Burroughs, 1947

Community Posting Guidelines | Front Page Article Submission Guidelines

 

Cassius

Can it really alter your brain chemistry forever? I would have thought that something like this, if possible, would merely prevent euphoria for a certain period. That eventually, once the drug was completely out of your system, you would be able to be affected by mind-altering drugs again.

But the way they refer to it as a vaccine, and outright state that it would make you unable to have these experiences forever, well.... that's downright scary. Do they really have something that can do this?

__________________

{ Cassius, Your Humble Narrator }
{ Posting Guidelines | Erowid Drug Information Resource | instantfilehosting.com }

JTP

Well this is pretty strange. I am curious how it translates from rats to humans. I wonder about the side effects and how such a vaccine would interact with some of the more common painkillers.

Good thing it apparently has no effect upon marijuana use.

WNB

^It's only a matter of time, JTP. They now know how to block receptor sites in the brain, so they could theoretically do this for almost every drug.

What really bothers me about this is that it's not like the receptor sites drugs bind to aren't in use when a person isn't getting high. They're used naturally, too. For example, heroin uses the dopamine receptor sites, which are also naturally used when you feel pleasure. Blocking them would seriously limit a person's ability to feel happy.

__________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

Higher Logic

Hey, no problem right? Just take a pill for that, one more thing to buy!

__________________
Crucial Web Hosting · Garden's Cure · Marijuana Recipes · Drug Testing Facts

Dilution · Substitution · Urine Testing · Hair Testing · Drug Testing FAQ

 

LeXtasy420

OMFG even the idea of this pisses me off what the F*** kind of people are there in this world God help us all

Sombie

Ths article has sent chills down my spine, seriously.

If such a thing ever does exist, not only should the government not encourage it, but it should BAN it, atleast on use of children. Forcing a child to take such a thing should be considered child abuse, as it would effect that child for the rest of his/her life.

Euro_hippie

George Orwell must be laughing in his grave. Why is there no public outrage at this issue? I would have thought that any normal person would be sickend by the IDEA of permantently blocking off bits of their child's brain. But they already have these "vaccines" in development. I guess that having a permanently brain damaged child is good trade-off for making sure your kid never uses drugs. Riiiight?

What kind of sick bastard would

Why don't people get it into their heads that "euphoria" can be a good thing?

shaunbiesly

This world doesnt think before they come up with ideas. You people dont know the first thing about drugs and making a vaccine. Why dont you try it on your newborn baby and see if they live for future testing. God gave people the choice from right and wrong, and they are smart enough, regardless what the media or you say, to choose whether or not to get involved in drugs.

If you make a vaccine, then all the illegal drugs should be legal. It would take you 20 years to figure out the correct dosage for everyone in the world, and your sinning in the eyes of God. How would you like it, if your parents decided to choose the vaccine to give you. The only problem is never knowing what the rest of the world feels because your left out.

Change the world for the good of mankind and God, and not for being a greedy American.

xxdr_zombiexx

Imagine an entire RACE of conservative "thinkers". No creativity, no questioning authority.

Once we have our euphoria and creative thoughts suppressed (they do tend to go hand-in-hand, with increasing correlation the higher the persons intelligence is) they will get us to do more work:There's a nice view of the future of humanity

And we are to be saved from Drug-induced slavery by the ridiculous war on unapproved drugs?

PS - WHO is to blame for this entire mentality?

You know who.

Say it out loud.

__________________
Alien Space Signal

There's no money for your issue so long as we're squandering $50 billion a year on the DrugWar. Ben Masel

Fear became the ultimate tool of this government - V.