Marijuana.com

Buzzby

Sanity's AWOL In War On Drugs
Sidney Zion | New York Daily News | 12/02/2004

The latest battle in the great War on Drugs showed up in the Supreme Court on Monday, with the feds arguing that if sick or dying people are allowed to use homegrown Marijuana for their pain, the price on the streets will go down.

In the logic of the war department, this would have a terrible impact on interstate commerce, where, presumably, Congress has an interest in promoting the sale of Marijuana.

If this strikes you as crazy, it's because you don't understand the law, the necessary reach of a government that is grounded on the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. We are talking now of the stuff of lawyers and judges, who, when it comes to drugs, display no immunity from going AWOL from reality.

First, the facts of the two cases out of California that the top court heard this week. One involved a woman with inoperable brain cancer, the other a woman whose severe back spasms require Marijuana.

By referendum, California voters passed a law permitting the use of Marijuana under a doctor's order to relieve a variety of medical ailments. Nine other states followed suit.

The federal drug enforcers answered by busting both women. The U.S. Court of Appeals in California ruled for them on the grounds their conduct did not fall within Congress' authority to regulate interstate commerce because this had nothing to do with any kind of commerce, much less interstate.

You might think the government would let cases like this pass or at least show benign neglect. We're not talking about legalization of narcotics here, just medicalization, just humanity.

But the War on Drugs has no interest in such sentimentality. This war is 90 years old with nothing to show but failure, combined with rampant corruption.

It doesn't matter. The more we lose, the more we spend. In the Supreme Court arguments, the government estimated that the Marijuana market alone accounts for $10.5 billion a year - then asked the court to knock out California's law in the name of helping the war succeed!

The argument that homegrown pot had an impact on interstate commerce rests on a 1942 Supreme Court decision that allowed the feds to punish a wheat grower for withholding his home consumption from the Agriculture Department's regulations. The reason: If he hadn't used it for his family, he'd have bought it in the marketplace, thus raising the price of wheat, which Congress wanted.

Justice Anthony Scalia said he had always thought that case was a joke, but now he opined that it was the law. Scalia, who votes for states' rights except when he doesn't - see Gore vs. Bush - said that the old wheat ruling looked right to him now.

Students of Scalia, the sharpest man on the court, might have thought he could separate the wheat from the weed. But the politics of drugs has a way with the finest of minds, and according to reporters covering the court, the majority is going to overturn the California law.

I asked Yale Kamisar, the legendary law professor at Michigan Law School, what he thought about this apparent reliance by the court on the ancient wheat decision.

"I look at it this way," he said. "If they're right, the Congress can ban breast-feeding because it has an economic impact on the interstate sale of milk."

__________________

 

Cassius

ROFL!

That seems like EXACTLY the same thing to me, as well. I hope someone brings this up in court! I'd love to see the justices ponder THAT.

__________________

{ Cassius, Your Humble Narrator }
{ Posting Guidelines | Erowid Drug Information Resource | instantfilehosting.com }

Bluee

US Government entities make more money selling illegal drugs illegally then they would if they had to tax and regulate legally. This seems to be a recurring theme...

Kamisar's quote reminds me of the famous quote, you know the one that goes like "first they came for the jews, but I did not speak up, since I was not a jew,............, then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak up for me."

I don't forsee Congress banning breast feeding in the near future, unless of course it is for the 'tainted exposure of a sacred woman's breast'. Think of the children! Being exposed to BREASTS at such a young age! We must do something...

__________________
Pessimism is being content when things go bad, while enjoying life when proven wrong.

Hiz Highness

We like to believe that we are the voters, and that as voters we are the ones in control of what is going on in this country.

One day we'll wake up and realize that we're just the workers for our political and corporate masters. If the decision comes down between saving the lives and aiding the health of the workers, or having the laws slanted to make more money for the corporate masters we all know which way the decision is going to go.

Wave the flags of your opressors, people. Stand up and wave them proudly.

-HH

Puffer

Originally posted by Buzzby:
If true, then the Supreme Court is packed with blunt objects.

__________________
Just say "know" to marijuana!