Marijuana.com

Plainsman1963

Speakout: Medical Marijuana case affects state
12-03-04 | Robert J. Corry Jr. | Rocky Mountain News

Assault weapons drawn, dozens of black-clad federal agents, in full riot gear and body armor, burst into a peaceful suburban Aurora home at the end of quiet cul-de-sac. No, they don't seek Osama bin Laden; instead, agents scour every nook and cranny for that pernicious threat to national security: state-approved medical Marijuana, used by sick patients for relief from illness and pain, as Colorado voters intended.

Inside the home, agents find a terrified man who peacefully presents his state of Colorado-issued card and certificate, the government's permission for him to grow, possess and use medical Marijuana. This gentle man, Dana K. May, suffers from reflex sympathetic dystrophy, a debilitating and potentially lethal nerve disease with pain so intense that some of its sufferers take their own lives. May, a clean-cut Republican and married father of three, describes the pain as though "my feet are in a deep fryer."

A U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agent snatches his state-issued card, arrogantly saying "we're DEA, we don't follow Colorado's Constitution." Then, federal agents trash May's home. Agents find what they seek: May's modest medical Marijuana garden, tucked in his basement behind two locked doors. They rip out of the soil the plants painstakingly tended as a "labor of love" by a man who uses medical Marijuana only as a last resort.

May had spent seven years trying every possible prescription drug including synthetic Marijuana, none of which were remotely effective for his intense pain, and all of which are expensive and unhealthy. May reluctantly turned to medical Marijuana in 2001, only as a last resort for pain, only after his longtime, trusted doctor's recommendation, and only because medical Marijuana is legal in Colorado, having been approved by voters in 2000. May's three kids fully understand that Marijuana is OK only for Dad, only as medicine, and only by prescription and state approval.

After seizing May's medicine, ruining his life for six months by bringing back the excruciating pain, the federal government eventually backs down in the face of a lawsuit, and return May's growing equipment. Now, May is growing again - this time at an undisclosed location - living in constant fear that federal agents again might break down his door for doing something the voters of Colorado approved.

On Nov. 29, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could end terrifying incidents like Dana May's. In the case of Ashcroft v. Raich, the high court will consider whether the federal government can enforce federal drug laws against medical Marijuana patients operating under state laws. Currently, 11 states have legalized medical Marijuana, and that number is expected to grow.

At issue is the U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, the Commerce Clause, which grants Congress the power to "regulate Commerce . . . among the several States." The Constitution created a limited federal government that could act only within its enumerated powers, and did not have general authority to do anything it wanted.

Somehow, the act of growing medicine in your own home, using it in your own home, never selling it, and never even taking it out of your own home, much less the State of Colorado, became "commerce among the several states." This case is important because if May's growing medical Marijuana is not interstate commerce, then the federal government has no power to seize his medicine. But if his actions completely within his own home are interstate commerce, then everything is interstate commerce.

The Founding Fathers' dream of a limited federal government of enumerated powers has become a twisted nightmare where the Constitution does not mean what it says, and where there is no limit to federal power because the Commerce Clause is meaningless. This case is larger than just medical Marijuana; it concerns the creeping expansion of federal power at the expense of the voters of the state of Colorado who wish to govern themselves.

Obviously, May's actions are not "commerce" and they are certainly not "interstate." Common sense and lower courts agree. The distinguished U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Alex Kozinski, a Ronald Reagan appointee, wrote in Conant v. Walters that "Medical Marijuana, when grown locally for personal consumption, does not have any direct or obvious effect on interstate commerce. Federal efforts to regulate it considerably blur the distinction between what is national and what is local." Let's hope the Supreme Court will make this blurred distinction crystal clear.

Robert J. Corry Jr. is a Denver attorney who represented Dana K. May in the case discussed above.

__________________


"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." - Claire Wolfe

Posting Guidelines

 

king cola

DEA seems to show Nazi like behavior. I mean c'mon "we're DEA, we don't follow Colorado's Constitution." They take the poor guys medical marijuana card from him and then say that bullsh*t. Do votes even count anymore? If all laws have to match the governments then I guess if the gov legalizes something and the state bans it, the gov should over rule the states decision because the gov says the law is ok! In this case the state says something is ok but because the gov doesn't it's got to be over turned.

What the hell do they care if people are using marijuana for medical use? They gotta protect the shareholders who invest in these big drug markets. Forget marijuana, use our pharmacutical drugs, approved by the FDA! I'm not figuring out how all these people are getting busted, is the DEA somehow finding information that these people have a medical card that allows them to possess/grow marijuana? If I was one of these patients and legally from the state had a medical card, I still wouldn't say one word to anyone about growing.

They say the constitution doesn't mean what it says? Oh that's right, it only means what the people in power want it to mean for their own agenda.

Buzzby

I've wondered about this a lot myself. If the DEA is getting med MJ users name from the state registry, that's a tremendous disincentive to becoming a legal user. If the users have "loose lips" and someone turns them in it wouldn't normally be to federal authorities, it would be to local or state law enforcement. Do the city, county, and state LEOs turn it over to the feds because they want to get around the state laws?

I don't know. The way things stand now I'm not sure I'd apply for a med MJ card even if I qualified. It might be safer not to. This, of course, if what the feds want us to do. Then they can say there's no need for med MJ because no one is applying for cards.

__________________

JTP

That is the exact reason why so many 2nd Amendment supporters resist a national registry. I really hope the S. C. clears up a lot of this, one way or the other...

greatful Bud

i have my med mj card and i have had it for 4 years now, and not a day goes by that i dont look over my sholder to see if anyone has an eye on me. the state says im safe but who really knows. there is so much going on in the higher ups of gov. that we dont know about; that's the scary part.

 

Mendrel

I'd like to know why the DEA was there. What possible information or reason could they have to be there? Who issued the search warrent and on what grounds?

__________________
Stop supporting the black market and grow your own at
www.GardensCure.com

Bluee

One of these days, a victim of these kind of DEA assaults is going to snap and go postal on the DEA agents. Luckily since Marijuana use is so pacifying, that lowers the liklihood of such acts. I know though that I would be beyond infuriated if I were May then.

__________________
Pessimism is being content when things go bad, while enjoying life when proven wrong.

Buzzby

If you concede that the feds have jurisdiction here, med marijuana users are in violation of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. I would guess a federal magistrate issued the warrant, the probable cause being a report that persons at that address were in violation of the CSA.

Buzzby

That would be a black day for medical marijuana. A violent med marijuana patient would fit right in to the feds Reefer Madness fantasy.

tradeco

Yeah , that definetly would not be good .

__________________
I feel sorry for people who don't smoke weed . When they wake up in the morning , that's as good as they're going to feel all day .


PEACE............................................. .................................................. ................................