Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-28-2005, 09:20 AM   #1
Lothar121
Seasoned Activist
 
Lothar121's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,390
Grams: 3,159.20
Groans: 1
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lothar121 is starting to make a name for themself
Thanks: 6
Thanked 22 Times in 10 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default CT: Joint Support

Joint Support
State lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are supporting medical marijuana
Traci Neal| Hartford Advocate | 05/26/2005

State lawmakers will need to beat the clock to squeeze through a bill that would allow adults with cancer or another chronic condition to get high to ease painful symptoms.

Though the bill has bipartisan support and has passed without fanfare through several committees, the legislature adjourns in just a few weeks so lawmakers will need to move swiftly. Even conservative lawmakers are voting in favor of the legislation after cancer survivors and people with other chronic conditions testified in recent weeks about how marijuana has helped them.

The bill awaits a Senate vote, which had not yet been scheduled as of press time Tuesday. If it passes, the bill would be sent to the House for approval, and then to Gov. M. Jodi Rell. Rell, who underwent breast cancer surgery in December, has not publicly taken a stance on the issue.

"I feel confident that the bill will be called in the Senate soon and move forward quickly from that point," says Republican state Rep. Penny Bacchiochi, one of the sponsors. "There are several legislators working hard on the bill." The session ends June 8.

Though federal studies have so far been reported as inconclusive, 36 states -- including Connecticut -- have passed legislation recognizing marijuana's medicinal value, and 10 states currently allow patients legal access to medical marijuana, according to the Drug Policy Alliance.

Those in favor of medical pot say people have used it medicinally for 2,000 years, that doctors prescribe drugs far more dangerous than marijuana, and that marijuana is preferred in some cases over traditional narcotics because prescription pain killers and appetite stimulants often have other serious side effects.

Chemotherapy, for instance, can cause nausea and appetite loss so severe that starvation becomes a concern. Patients have said smoking marijuana gave them the ability to tolerate food and keep it down. Recent polls showed more than 80 percent of U.S. residents polled -- and 83 percent of Connecticut residents according to a UConn survey -- approve of marijuana use for sick people.

Connecticut oncologist Andrew L. Salner, director of the Helen and Harry Gray Cancer Center at Hartford Hospital, testified at a recent public hearing on the bill. Cancer patients, he said, use marijuana to alleviate their symptoms and improve their quality of life. "Most notably, some patients near the end of life might benefit from this approach whereby their symptoms could be lessened and they might have fewer sedating or other side effects from some of their regular medications."

The government argues that most of the evidence supporting medical marijuana is anecdotal and unscientific. "It should not surprise anybody that sincere people, after smoking marijuana, might report relief of any number of their symptoms. Marijuana is an intoxicant," Walters told state lawmakers in April.

Opponents also say smoking marijuana is unhealthy and sends a mixed message to children. And despite initiatives individual states might take, it's still illegal on the federal level. John Walters, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, told Connecticut legislators during a recent public hearing, that state actions are presenting a challenge "to the integrity of the drug approval process.

(LothNote: This is the consistent message the Drug Czar's office puts out, but I have yet to see any substantial evidence that medical marijuana laws lead to increased use among our youth. However in California which has the loosest medical marijuana law coupled with possessing the longest time to have such a law on the books has not confused teens into smoking cannabis all the time. To the contrary the 2003-2004 California Student Survey (CSS), released by Attorney General Bill Lockyer, shows that adolescent marijuana use remains significantly lower than in 1996. )

"By law, and for good reason, the FDA is the sole governmental entity charged with testing and approving new medications," Walters said.

Clinical trials are difficult because there is no effective placebo for smoked marijuana. Marijuana research facilities, such as the one at UMass Amherst, say the DEA has blocked efforts to grow or obtain pot for research. Some claim pharmaceutical companies have lobbied to keep medical marijuana from becoming mainstream.

If the bill passes, users would have to register with the state, and would not be allowed to smoke in public or near anyone under the age of 18.
__________________
Lothar121 is offline Award Lothar121 Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 05-28-2005, 03:17 PM   #2
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,171
Grams: 42,653.84
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,514 Times in 1,781 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
State lawmakers will need to beat the clock to squeeze through a bill that would allow adults with cancer or another chronic condition to get high to ease painful symptoms.
According to Montel Williams and several other medical marijuana patients, they don't get high - they just get relief. This makes sense. Frequent users develop tolerance to the psychoactive effects of marijuana. With enough use these effects virtually disappear.


Quote:
"It should not surprise anybody that sincere people, after smoking marijuana, might report relief of any number of their symptoms. Marijuana is an intoxicant," Walters told state lawmakers in April.
We wouldn't want sick people to have any relief, now would we? As noted above, marijuana used medicinally is not an intoxicant.


Quote:
Opponents also say smoking marijuana is unhealthy and sends a mixed message to children.
Opponents fail to say that there are ways other than smoking to consume marijuana. We prescribe morphine to people in pain. Does that send a "mixed message" to children?


Quote:
"By law, and for good reason, the FDA is the sole governmental entity charged with testing and approving new medications," Walters said.
Then why doesn't the FDA do a serious clinical trial of marijuana and find out how well it works to alleviate symptoms with far fewer toxic effects than any other medication? The only research being authorized is research aimed at reinforcing the prohibitionist "marijuana is evil" line. Using low-quality smoked marijuana all they've demonstrated is that if you smoke enough it's going to give you a bad cough.


Quote:
Clinical trials are difficult because there is no effective placebo for smoked marijuana.
a)They could use the buds from hemp plants that naturally contain less than 0.5% THC.
b)They can extract 98% of caffeine from whole coffee beans. Why can't they extract almost all the THC from marijuana? (Any chemists out there are urged to jump in on this one.)


Quote:
Some claim pharmaceutical companies have lobbied to keep medical marijuana from becoming mainstream.
Could this be why the FDA, a seeming tool of the pharmaceutical industry, refuses to authorize or sponsor meaningful medical marijuana research?
__________________
McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time.
Do we really want four more years of the same old shit?

~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008

Buzzby is offline Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2005, 08:07 PM   #3
GENESIS129
New Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11
Grams: 667.55
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
GENESIS129 has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default We have enough problems w/o the BS

It's about time they get serious & start caring for the people of our nation instead of profit. I am one of those with cronic illness & the prescription drugs are destroying my liver, destorted my body & face. And never have I known nausea. No pills help.

There should never be laws against a viable medicine. 200,000 people die in America due to Western drugs each year.

God Bless the all those who are forced to live in agony so that the governmet can line their pockets.


Genesis129
GENESIS129 is offline Award GENESIS129 Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:54 AM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52