Zilos

Letters To The Editor:
We oppose the legalization of medical marijuana. To date, no critical research has been performed establishing its efficacy or safety. The American Medical Association, American Optometric Association and National Institutes of Health are all in opposition to this Bill 124.

Every symptom or disease cited by the advocates of medical marijuana has other appropriately researched, and medically approved, alternatives for treatment. There currently is no way to control the dosing, contamination from other chemicals or molds, and harmful effects on the lungs and immune system in ingested or inhaled marijuana.

Cannabis is often the first illicit drug that the young people of Connecticut are introduced to, second only to cigarettes. There is an association between a drop in scholastic performance, criminal behavior, mood or anxiety problems, and future drug dependence with the regular use of marijuana. Perception of harm is a very strong deterrent to the use of drugs by young people. This bill would send the wrong message.

Individuals dependent on this drug are known to use compulsively even when their health, education, jobs, interpersonal relationships and legal status are in jeopardy. In 2002, more than 4,000 patients came into treatment in Connecticut citing marijuana as their primary drug problem, seven hundred of whom were adolescents.

It is insulting that the advocates would describe physicians not in support of this bill as not “believing it is important to help people suffering.” Please read those messages for what they are, misinformed and deceptive. Say no to legalization of medical marijuana.

Stephen A. Wyatt, O.D.
Mark Kraus, M.D.
Waterbury

Editor's note: Dr. Wyatt is president of the Connecticut Chapter of the American Society of Addiction Medicine and Dr. Kraus is the immediate past president.

__________________
:: Posting Guidelines :: 420 Lounge :: Hemp Cultivation :: Myths :: Canadian Laws :: U.S. Laws :: Recipes ::