Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-01-2005, 09:00 AM   #1
Herb Ninja
Seasoned Activist
 
Herb Ninja's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,438
Grams: 3,085.55
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Herb Ninja can see the Karmic Tunnel of Life
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default CA: Marijuana is not a hard pill to swallow

Marijuana is not a hard pill to swallow
5-31-2005 | STEVE SMITH | Daily Pilot


The last thing that Newport Beach or Costa Mesa needs is another legalized drug. But the exception to this is to allow medical marijuana to be dispensed in either town.

The issue of a medical marijuana dispensary came up recently and even made it to the May 24 agenda of the Newport Beach City Council meeting. The proposal was to allow 45 days for an examination of the ramifications of such a facility.

There are several sides to this issue, one that is undoubtedly going to be unfairly painted as a backdoor attempt to legalize pot. Expect that assertion but don't let it interfere with your examination of the facts.

One of the most important facts is that marijuana is a proven, legitimate medical remedy. Marijuana has proven to be effective in reducing nausea caused by cancer chemotherapy, in reducing internal eye pressure that progressively leads to blindness in glaucoma, in increasing the appetite for AIDS patients suffering from the wasting syndrome, and in reducing muscle spasms for people with epilepsy and multiple sclerosis.

A few years ago, two Harvard professors, psychiatrist Lester Grinspoon and lawyer James Bakalar, recommended medicinal marijuana in a commentary in the Journal of the American Medical Assn.

Other organizations including the California Nursing Assn., the California Academy of Family Physicians and the Chicago Tribune -- the flagship of the media company that owns this newspaper -- came out several years ago in support of the state's medical marijuana legislation, known as Proposition 215.

That initiative, which passed, did not legalize marijuana. It changed how certain people -- medical patients and their primary caregivers -- will be treated by the State of California's court system.

But some folks look at anything having to do with marijuana, and all they can see through their 60s-colored glasses are long-haired hippies in tie-dye shirts. It is sad but true that one of the great negatives of medical marijuana's advancement is that it has to be smoked to be effective. If this discussion were about a pill, there would be no discussion.

All of the hand wringing over a local dispensary is at once comical and hypocritical. I find it funny that medical marijuana has scared so many otherwise intelligent people into believing that our children are going to be exposed to pot on every street corner if we allow a local dispensary.

Uh, sorry folks, but regular pot can be found on every high school campus. Kids have no trouble getting it. Does that alone make the dispensary OK? No, I mention it only for the comic effect.

The hypocrisy comes into play when I see a liquor license granted to a new restaurant, but we deny a few people the opportunity to ease their pain with medical marijuana. Just because alcohol is legal doesn't make it better. Alcohol, in my opinion, has done far greater damage to society than the same usage of marijuana ever could. Yet, Newport Beach and Costa Mesa support hundreds of places to get alcohol, a highly dangerous drug. If I had to choose, marijuana would be legal and alcohol would not.

Even the belief that alcohol is more dangerous than marijuana is not enough support for a dispensary. What makes the dispensary legitimate is that it offers relief to people who are sick. That is enough of a reason.

But on the flip side, I'm still questioning the whole concept of a dispensary with the specific purpose of providing marijuana. After all, if the typical dispensary customer needs a doctor's permission to get the marijuana, why can't the doctor issue it? Why the need to draw attention to this particular remedy? Doctors routinely write prescriptions, which are filled at local drug stores, for drugs that are far more potent. That, it seems to me, should work for medical marijuana as well.

Regular readers of this column who have assumed my conservative stance on every issue will be surprised today. But important issues should not be decided on liberal or conservative lines or by the allegiance to a particular political party. Some issues, such as this one, must be decided simply on what is just and fair.

Medical marijuana is not going to destroy our culture. In fact, allowing it to be issued will be a sign of great compassion, something that will make us even stronger.
__________________
Ron Paul for the Long Haul
Herb Ninja is offline Award Herb Ninja Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 06-01-2005, 02:15 PM   #2
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,171
Grams: 42,661.29
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,781 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default E-mail to the author

I've just sent this message to the author of the editorial:

Quote:
Dear Mr. Smith -

I'm always glad to see a conservative voice speak out for compassion and rationality on the medical marijuana issue. I wish more people on your side of the aisle would follow William F. Buckley's lead and stop milking the idea that legitimized marijuana is the end of Western Civilization.

There are a couple of points from your editorial upon which I'd like to expand:

"It is sad but true that one of the great negatives of medical marijuana's advancement is that it has to be smoked to be effective. If this discussion were about a pill, there would be no discussion."

This is one of the sticking points. The ONDCP keeps harping on the idea that medical marijuana is dangerous because it must be administered by smoking. This is not true. Marijuana can be cooked into food. It can also be packed into gelatin capsules. This route, though, is often impossible for the people suffering from severe nausea and who can't keep anything in their stomachs until marijuana has worked its magic. There are devices called "vaporizers" which extract the active ingredients from marijuana as a vapor that can be inhaled. These devices do not burn the herb and thus create none of the smoke that the prohibitionists consider to be so dangerous.

"I'm still questioning the whole concept of a dispensary with the specific purpose of providing marijuana. After all, if the typical dispensary customer needs a doctor's permission to get the marijuana, why can't the doctor issue it? Why the need to draw attention to this particular remedy? Doctors routinely write prescriptions, which are filled at local drug stores, for drugs that are far more potent. That, it seems to me, should work for medical marijuana as well."

The prescribing and dispensing of drugs is controlled under federal law. A schedule I drug such as marijuana cannot be dispensed by prescription nor sold through federally monitored channels. This is why it must be "recommended" by a physician rather than prescribed. Until the federal government stops politicizing the suffering of thousands of sick people, the California system of home growing and dispensaries is the only route that will avoid the arrest and prosecution of doctors and pharmacists.

Thank you for your attention.

Best Regards,
Buzzby [6/1/05 10:14:30 AM]
__________________
McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time.
Do we really want four more years of the same old shit?

~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008

Buzzby is offline Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:39 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52