Marijuana.com

Buzzby

Experts Say Cannabis Should Stay Class C Despite Mental Health Fears
Sophie Goodchild | The Independent | 09/25/2005

Drug experts will advise ministers that there should be no reversal of the downgrading of cannabis from a class B to a class C drug following claims that it is linked with mental illness.

Members of the Advisory Council on Drugs (ACMD) are understood to have ruled out a change after hearing evidence from cannabis users as well as police and drugs charities.

The ACMD met yesterday and on Friday in response to a request from Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, to reassess the dangers of the drug. This followed the recent publication of studies which associated cannabis with "psychotic" symptoms.

The drug advisers were also asked to provide guidance on a higher classification for skunk - a more potent form of cannabis - but it is understood that members of the ACMD think this would be unworkable.

Most cases of cannabis possession are now non-arrestable offences, but research published next year is likely to show some police forces are continuing to take a hard line against users.

A source close to the ACMD said: "The feeling is that the committee has given thorough consideration to all the research on the health risks of cannabis and that reclassification is not necessary."

However, this does not rule out a rethink. Mr Clarke has indicated he still may reverse the decision of David Blunkett, the previous Home Secretary, to make cannabis a class C drug even if the ACMD advises him against this.

__________________

 

MrIMStoned

It looks like the're looking for a way to punish pot smokers, who are disturbances, from the 40 year olds growing 1 plant. I mean what would the difference be? You get high smoking any classification of pot.

__________________
"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?"

Hashishi

*folds arms and leans back in large, green, fluffy arm-chair looking smug and self-satisfied*

well, at least they LOOK like they've done something, eh?

charles clarke really is a prick. seriously, its always nice to see a new minister come in (especially after the last one was blind) just to see how long it takes for people to turn against him. i think this balding ball of flab's set a new record. wanker.

__________________
SWP



"I'm not into this detail stuff. I'm more concepty." -- "If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly." -- "Secretary Powell and I agree on every single issue that has ever been before this administration except for those instances where Colin's still learning." -- "As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns: the ones we don't know we don't know."

vladimir

this reminds me of when nixon created a committee to figure out how to better fight the drug war. when they came back with the biggest solution being to decriminalize pot, he threw the report away.
some politicians just cant handle the truth, even if they commissioned the search for it.

__________________
If a drug (or technique or process) were ever to be discovered which would consistently produce a plus four experience in all human beings, it is conceivable that it would signal the ultimate evolution, and perhaps the end of, the human experiment.

ssj3gotenks

What is GBR? is that in the US? UK? I don't know but i really hope that cannabis is decrimialized/legalized, rather than more illegal.

Medical or not medical, if cannabis was legal, crime would drop. The government wants to tell you about how evil mj is but what they DON'T tell you is how they got the FBI to distribute crack cocaine in ghettos to spread havoc. It just has to be true. There is soooo much evidence supporting this claim. I'm not sure why they did that, but they did do it, i'm 90% sure. Also, cigarettes/nicotine has NO accepted medical use but it's legal.

 

Buzzby

Great BRitain


That's a pretty wild claim! Where's the evidence? Sounds like tinfoil-hat stuff to me.

Hashishi

i've got a funny feeling that claim's been mixed up with rumours surrounding the cia's financial involvement with drug trafficking.

ssj3gotenks

Well first of all, let me first remind you of political corruption problems involving Nixon. While i'm not an expert on this incident, i do know 2 things: the great deal of dishonesty towards the American People and two, how hard the government tried in covering this up. Another instance that supports the corruption of the government are things that have to do with George and Barbara Bush. First barbara bush was driving drunk in Europe and hit and killed a pedestrian and didn't even get a ticket because of her status as the first lady. Sound Familiar? if not, think about all the police in the US who abuse their power. Second, think about our gas prices right now. Bush knows about this problem and doesn't care because he wants to make his buddies rich. Of course barbara and george bush don't want us to know this though.

But to go back to what i'm really getting at, this incident with the FBI, occuring probably in the middle to late 1980's, was done so knowing the full problems that would occur. And you guys know what, Internal Affairs (the organization that investigates crimes from law enforcement) ain't s***!