Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-28-2005, 09:20 AM   #1
WNB
Seasoned Activist
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,161
Grams: 2,519.70
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
WNB has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default CA: War on Drugs intensifies gang violence

War on Drugs intensifies gang violence
Conor Fridersdorf | San Bernardino County Sun | 11/27/2005

Did illegal drugs help kill Mynesha Crenshaw?
In a town where gangs finance their operations through the drug trade, a business where territorial wars and deals gone bad are settled at gunpoint, can illegal drugs ever be ruled out when innocents are slain by wayward bullets?

Every lengthy discussion about violent crime eventually includes an argument about the War on Drugs, for better or worse the most consequential law enforcement effort in America.

On The Sun's crime blog, some San Bernardino residents have said the police must prosecute the War on Drugs more vigorously to protect innocents trapped in neighborhoods with drug-running gangs, marijuana sales at school and abusive addict parents and spouses plaguing home life.

Other residents have suggested that the War on Drugs is itself part of the problem. Make narcotics legal, they say, and the violence associated with their illicit purchase will vanish much like the repeal of prohibition ended the violent trade in alcohol.

I cannot say whether we'd be better off if we legalized drugs.

I think many who favor legalization underestimate its potential for damage. Rather than asking how poorly educated people who lack good decision-making skills will react to legalization, they imagine everyone in their own image: a rational actor with middle-class values and a middle-class support network to bail them out if things get out of hand.

No matter how carefully we plan and anticipate, legalization would bring significant surprises, unintended consequences and irreversible effects that would ripple through society indefinitely. It is a step not to be taken lightly.

But the status quo on our current policy of prohibition is a catastrophic failure that any society would be foolish to leave in place.

If I had an answer to this dilemma, I'd be asking for your vote as a candidate for the U.S. Senate rather than penning a column you'll hopefully read before lining the bird cage.

In the space I have left, however, I'd like to offer one seldom-heard argument for legalization that I find quite persuasive.

Here it goes: If drugs were made legal, the people who might be hurt are those who only tried them because they could. As compassionate humans, we would mourn these victims and regret their suffering. However, having warned them, we'd also acknowledge their culpability. Having made the wrong choice, they'd bear the consequences and have no one but themselves to blame.

Unfortunately, many victims of our current drug policy are not so fortunate. Drug prohibition might have saved a kid somewhere who won't die overdosing on heroine.

On the other hand, it helped to kill Mynesha Crenshaw, a little girl who bears no culpability for The Drug War. Without street gangs supported by the illicit drug trade, she would probably be alive.

South American coffee farmers are losing crops to coca-killing pesticides. Elderly homeowners' neighborhoods are being overrun by drug dealers. And innocent children are being killed in wars over drug territory. No matter how you look at it, drug prohibition shifts many of the costs of illegal drugs onto those who never chose to use, produce or sell them in order to protect people from using drugs.

The price paid by innocent people is even more staggering when you consider all the lives that could be saved if all the resources from the War on Drugs were instead used for a war on violent crime, or heart-disease research, or protection from terrorists.

If lives must be destroyed by drugs - and they will be no matter how fervently we wish it to be otherwise - isn't it fairer if those whose lives are destroyed are those who made their own poor decisions? Isn't that at least fairer than a policy that saves those people by waging a war that hurts and even kills so many innocents?
__________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
WNB is offline Award WNB Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 11-29-2005, 08:09 AM   #2
Tokamak
Jr. Member
 
Tokamak's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 191
Grams: 1,404.02
Groans: 2
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tokamak has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 114
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

This is a good article. It's rare to see both sides of the legalization argument portrayed equally. This is exactly the kind of rational, careful thought about the Drug War that needs to be heard more often. Bravo.

Peace.
__________________
"He who knows does not speak. He who speaks does not know."
- Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching
Tokamak is offline Award Tokamak Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:07 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52