Marijuana.com

PotShot

Supervisors right to question medical marijuana
By: PAM SLATER-PRICE | North County Times | December 17, 2005

As members of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, we recently voted to clarify the laws surrounding implementation of Proposition 215, an initiative authorizing medical marijuana identification cards.

State law says the sale of marijuana to medicinal users is legal. Federal law says it is illegal. My colleagues and I on the board voted not to distribute user cards. Later we voted to challenge state implementation of the law.

The courts will now decide whether federal law pre-empts or supersedes state law. That's the clarification we need. Holding a card may give medicinal users a false sense that what they are doing is legal. Additionally, the board might very well be in violation of federal law if we distribute the cards.

Tuesday's troublesome events shed more light on this issue. Federal agents executed search warrants on 13 medical marijuana dispensaries in the cities of San Diego and San Marcos. Since the latter city was once known to law enforcement officials and newspapers as the Methamphetamine Capital of the World, the proliferation of marijuana dispensaries there should make anyone sit up and take notice. Apparently, marijuana, easy to grow and cost-efficient, and now tacitly "legal," is a more lucrative trade. For there to be 13 illegal dispensaries already in business begs the question, where's the oversight?

Most telling was that a state judge issued the warrants and federal agents raided the dispensaries. This is precisely the quandary about mixed authority that prompted the Board of Supervisors to seek clarification of this issue.

Should you have any remaining questions about the effect of medical marijuana dispensaries on law enforcement and our neighborhoods, I urge you to discuss them with the sheriff and other law enforcement officials. Our public safety agencies have a tremendous problem with these outlets.

Frankly, if this was really a legally approved drug you would go to a pharmacy to buy your prescription.

In closing, the state has at its disposal many ways to issue medical marijuana ID cards. For instance, driver's licenses or Medi-Cal cards could be altered to signify allowed use.

Establishing political cover by forcing local governments to challenge state law is not the answer.

Pam Slater-Price is chairwoman of the county government's Board of Supervisors.

__________________

Carl Sagan Goodness Richard Dawkins Goodness

 

TheNewGuy

What? Uhh...I don't get it. What does meth have to do with medical marijuana thats being distributed legally (or at least legally under state law)?

So after the board of supervisors in San Diego decides to challenge proposition 215 the feds raid a bunch of dispensaries in San Diego. Coincidence of course.

So why don't they research it, have the FDA approve it, and then sell it in pharmacies? Seems like this would solve that problem.

What are the feds going to do, arrest every single politician in California? Simply stating that medical marijuana is in any way shape or form legal is against federal law, and california hasn't been arrested as a whole by the government since the med pot law was signed in back in 1996.

__________________
"Anyway, no drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society. If we're looking for the source of our troubles, we shouldn't test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power." ~P.J. O'Rourke

Buzzby

Huh? If that's the case, why is San Diego County the only one that feels "forced" to sue the state over a law that was established by a referendum of California's citizens?

__________________

urania3

I thought this had been decided in Gonzales v. Raich.

And what they're doing is legal, as far as the state of California is concerned.

__________________

Why is it that we cannot face the simple truth? Religion is at best unsubstantiated superstition. (Massimo Pigliucci)