Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-14-2006, 09:20 AM   #1
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,176
Grams: 42,699.74
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,524 Times in 1,784 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default AUS: Marijuana Tests Confirm AFL Concern

Marijuana Tests Confirm AFL Concern
Jake Niall, Caroline Wilson & Michael Gleeson | The Age | 03/14/2006

A DISPROPORTIONATE number of indigenous players have tested positive to marijuana under the AFL's out-of-competition testing regime, heightening AFL concern about the impact of the new World Anti-Doping Agency drug code on Aboriginal players.

Sources have confirmed to The Age that the out-of-competition testing program has shown that Aboriginal players made up an extremely high percentage of positive tests to marijuana, the most widespread illicit drug.

There are 55 indigenous footballers on AFL lists in 2006 — about 8 per cent of all AFL players — and a much greater number of its stars, but The Age understands that indigenous players compromise several times that percentage — about 50 per cent in 2004 and close to 75 per cent in 2005 — of the positive tests to marijuana. The tests were all out of competition.

There is concern in club circles at the overwhelming proportion of positive tests involving indigenous players, a trend that has prompted senior club officials to alert the AFL of the problem. The AFL is already understood to have responded to club concerns and is already looking at establishing appropriate counselling services.

Cannabis accounts for the majority of the AFL's out of competition positive tests.

The AFL fought hard — and unsuccessfully — against the Federal Government's demand that it adopt the WADA drug code, on the grounds that as a non-performance-enhancing drug, cannabis should not carry such heavy penalties for positive tests in competition.

The positive tests to illicit drugs thus far — at least 15 players in 2005 — were all out of competition. Three players from non-Victorian clubs, including a premiership player, have recorded two positive tests to illicit drugs. A third positive test would force the player to face the tribunal.

The revelation of the disproportionate figures for indigenous players could create an image problem for the AFL, which has worked hard against racism and whose racial vilification rules were groundbreaking in Australian sport in the mid- 1990s.

The AFL has also placed great emphasis on development of indigenous players at grass roots level across Australia, viewing Aboriginal football as a significant source of talent and spectator appeal.

Marijuana poses a major problem for the league, too, because, unlike cocaine and ecstasy and amphetamines, the drugs stays within the user's system for several weeks. This makes it difficult to ascertain whether a test is in or out of competition.

The marijuana clause of the new AFL drug code was also strongly resisted by the players association, which continue to protest that such a test is a breach of the player's civil liberties.

The AFL could not be reached for comment last night.

Last Friday, The Age revealed that at least 15 players had tested positive to illicit drugs, with at least one player on the verge of a third strike, which would have led to them facing the tribunal and a potential ban.

A prominent player manager said yesterday he would press the AFL for a drug summit to reconsider the validity of tandem drug testing codes and evaluate if the current system is the most effective method of preventing drug use among players. Many player managers and clubs are troubled at the testing of players for drugs that are not performance enhancing.
__________________
McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time.
Do we really want four more years of the same old shit?

~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008

Buzzby is online now Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 03-14-2006, 12:12 PM   #2
Cassius
Seasoned Activist
 
Cassius's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,161
Grams: 2,597.20
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cassius has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

I guess AFL means Australian Football League? The link to the article doesn't appear to be working, it just points to "http://the age/"?
__________________

{ Cassius, Your Humble Narrator }
{ Posting Guidelines | Erowid Drug Information Resource | instantfilehosting.com }
Cassius is offline Award Cassius Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 04:41 PM   #3
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,176
Grams: 42,699.74
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,524 Times in 1,784 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassius
The link to the article doesn't appear to be working
Sorry about that. It's fixed.
Buzzby is online now Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 04:51 PM   #4
dedbr
Always Faithful
 
dedbr's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,942
Grams: 35,482.90
Groans: 11
Groaned at 22 Times in 15 Posts
dedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabia
Thanks: 2,469
Thanked 2,284 Times in 1,031 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Cool I only have this......

World Anti-Doping Agency.

WADA. Wad-a horse poopy. Sounds like they want to get rid of the aboriginals to me.


'Scuse me while I get my boots.....

Ded
__________________
"We have met the enemy, and he is us" .......... Pogo (for Prez...)

Remember to check out our most wonderful Posting Guidelines!
dedbr is offline Award dedbr Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 05:35 PM   #5
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,176
Grams: 42,699.74
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,524 Times in 1,784 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

It sounds like WADA needs to differentiate between performance-enhancing drugs and other drugs. Sports fans and honest athletes have a legitimate interest in knowing that athletes are not taking an unfair advantage in competitions.
Buzzby is online now Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 03-15-2006, 04:53 AM   #6
Tokamak
Jr. Member
 
Tokamak's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 192
Grams: 1,618.32
Groans: 2
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tokamak has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 117
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

It sounds like WADA needs to differentiate between performance-enhancing drugs and other drugs. Sports fans and honest athletes have a legitimate interest in knowing that athletes are not taking an unfair advantage in competitions.

Marijuana may not be a performance enhancing drug in the traditional sense, i.e. playing a sport while stoned will probably cause your performance to suffer. However, using pot while training (running, lifting weights, stretching, doing yoga, etc.) can provide a more satisfying, insightful workout. Its a bit of a stretch, I know, but it could be construed as giving a slight edge. Then again, so could meditation and focus training. The difference is that marijuana is a drug. Personally, I don't care what substances an athlete uses, so long as they're available to his competitors. Evolution works in mysterious ways...

Peace.
__________________
"He who knows does not speak. He who speaks does not know."
- Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching
Tokamak is offline Award Tokamak Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2006, 12:39 PM   #7
dedbr
Always Faithful
 
dedbr's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,942
Grams: 35,482.90
Groans: 11
Groaned at 22 Times in 15 Posts
dedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabiadedbr If reputation were oil, I'd be Saudi Arabia
Thanks: 2,469
Thanked 2,284 Times in 1,031 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Cool Tokamak....

Quote:
The difference is that marijuana is a drug.



I could of sworn herb was a plant. OK, OK, fine. I'll make a deal with ya all.

You can get herb changed to a drug and go to the doctor for a script and hope you can get enough to last until the next doctors visit, or..... you can be like ol' Doc Dedbr and self-medicate with a wonderful herbal remedy that I just happen to have right here in this sack.

I'm not for sure, but I've heard it can be performance enhancing at times, too.....


Only in Ded Land , Folks, only in Ded Land....
dedbr is offline Award dedbr Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52