| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #11 |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 83
Grams: 28.05 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| KUDOS, Mr. Faulninja, for reconizing and acknowledging PROPOGANDA. 1 down 3 millon to go. Alex reading his history book.................This Champolion guy was something else......no im not in school. Yes, I probably need more schooling, but at 40 I think I will learn it on my own. to learn something new each day keeps the mind from fading away that's mine.......... |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #12 |
| New Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Grams: 1,183.95 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| "I spoke to him about it, and my impression is that he's simply against the use of marijuana for any purpose. He stated that the stuff out today has some 40 times the tetrahydrocannabinol (active ingredient commonly known as THC) as what was smoked in the '60s, and while it may not be as dangerous as meth or heroin, it's certainly not harmless." I sure would like to know where they get these facts?...from Fox News? If the pot in the "OLD" days was 2-4% that means that the cronic out there is 40 X say 3%, so is that 80% THC?...that is some killer weed..... ![]()
__________________ End Prohibition |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |