| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Seasoned Activist ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,391
Grams: 3,512.00 Groans: 1
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 22 Times in 10 Posts
| Stop the Stops oudaily | 03/27/06 We're not going to beat around the bush here. We're just going to say it. We don't particularly care for the Norman Police Department's DUI checkpoints. Too many aspects of the program just bother us. Norman police conducted their first DUI checkpoint Thursday night into Friday morning, stopping 292 cars and handing out 20 citations, three of which were DUIs. (See page one.) Four people, however, were cited for possession of marijuana. Four were cited for minor in possession of alcohol. The checkpoint was established on Constitution Avenue, about a half mile west of Oak Tree Avenue, which leads to University Greens, University Commons, Forest Pointe and Hampton Woods apartment complexes — places inhabited mostly by students. The checkpoints, which reportedly include two or three police officers confronting cars while other officers pull over cars that attempt to back away from the checkpoint, are extreme measures of law enforcement. DUI checkpoints have explicitly been allowed by the U.S. Supreme Court on the premise that they sufficiently serve the public good to crack down on DUI. But when the checkpoint disbanded early Friday morning, more people had received citations for possession of marijuana than for DUI. In all, a mere drop in the municipal bucket. And where was that revenue enhanced? In several cases, it was within mere blocks of home. We are not defending drunken driving. In fact, perhaps the best result of these checkpoints will be fewer people too drunk to drive taking to the roads for fear of the checkpoints. Still, the checkpoints on the whole seem to be mechanical and ineffectual, accomplishing statistically little and yet affording police the opportunity at one predetermined location once a week to peer into an individual's life for 20 to 30 seconds and attempt to determine whether the law holds a verdict for him or her. For some reason, we just don't like that.
__________________ Donate. Write. Make a difference.. Posting Guidelines | Marijuana Policy Project | NORML | DPA | Drug WarRant | Media Awareness Project |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 830
Grams: 3,038.70 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
| In ontario they call it the ride program. I like it. It takes 15 seconds for an officer to lean down and say "have you had any alcohol tonight?" you say "no" and they say "alright then, please continue". If you havent been drinking its the same as stopping for a red light.
__________________ "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?" |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Banned Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 36
Grams: 25.90 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 660
Grams: 4,787.84 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
| "Do you feel it's an invasion of your privacy?" yes the police can DRIVE AROUND looking for people who cannot drive properly. Randomly stopping people is presuming that the folks they stop are guilty, in essence it is nothing more than A PRESUMPTION OF GUILT, we have these BS checkpoints here in France too, but I believe they do not yet exist in the UK, though I could be wrong about that. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Super Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,377
Grams: 42,653.73 Groans: 16
Groaned at 30 Times in 25 Posts
Thanks: 698
Thanked 1,571 Times in 972 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #6 |
| Seasoned Activist ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,161
Grams: 2,937.60 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| It isn't limited to alcohol, but just because you are in possession of marijuana doesn't mean you're high on it, either. It is still illegal to possess marijuana, but it is not DUI unless you are driving WHILE high.
__________________ { Cassius, Your Humble Narrator } { Posting Guidelines | Erowid Drug Information Resource | instantfilehosting.com } |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |