Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-08-2006, 09:20 AM   #1
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,126
Grams: 42,231.09
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 483
Thanked 3,469 Times in 1,754 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default ND: North Dakota Supreme Court Dismisses Sobriety Check Case

North Dakota Supreme Court Dismisses Sobriety Check Case
The North Dakota Supreme Court cannot decide the constitutionality of sobriety checkpoints
Rod Austin | The Bismarck Tribune | 07/07/2006

Bismarck, ND -- (SBWIRE) -- 07/07/2006 -- Brian Ehli, of Bismarck, was arrested on Sept. 17, 2005, for driving under the influence, possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of marijuana. He was later charged for the offenses in South Central District Court.

Ehli had been stopped at a North Dakota Highway Patrol sobriety checkpoint in Morton County on the Expressway Bridge just before the Memorial Highway exit.

Ehli pleaded not guilty to all three charges in district court. He also moved to suppress the evidence obtained when he was stopped at the checkpoint, arguing that the checkpoint violated the Fourth Amendment because a motorist approaching the checkpoint had no way to avoid it.

On Jan. 17, Judge Bruce Riskedahl granted Ehli's motion, citing a North Dakota Supreme Court ruling that said it is not constitutional to set up a checkpoint where the driver does not have the option of turning around without committing a traffic violation that would justify a stop.

On Jan. 18, the state moved to dismiss the case, because of the decision to suppress evidence. The case was dismissed on Jan. 20, and the state filed its notice of appeal on Feb. 7.

Because the state had previously asked for the case to be dismissed, the Supreme Court ruled that the case could not be appealed.

"The state's appeal is moot," wrote Supreme Court Justice Mary Maring in the decision.

Maring wrote that the state could have appealed Riskedahl's order granting the suppression of evidence before asking that the case be dismissed.

Attorneys involved in the case couldn't be reached for comment.
__________________
McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time.
Do we really want four more years of the same old shit?

~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008

Buzzby is offline Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52