Marijuana.com

Buzzby

Officials Take Pot (Road) Trip
Michael Fitzgerald | The Record | 07/14/2006

The mayor, vice mayor and a police lieutenant visited a medical marijuana dispensary in Sacra-mento recently. Afterward, the vice mayor sprang for Junior Mints.

Seriously, afterward, they grappled with the idea of a medical marijuana dispensary in Stockton.

Their struggle with this issue is, to put it kindly, protracted. California voters approved the Compassionate Use Act in 1996.

Certainly, it's a ticklish issue; yet communities all around Stockton have responsibly faced this challenge.

The most recent is Ripon. Hardly a hotbed of hippies, Ripon's council introduced a medical pot ordinance earlier this week. The final vote on it is Tuesday.

The visit by Stockton officials suggests city leaders are finally seriously researching pot clubs before deciding whether to permit one to open in Stockton.

Mayor Ed Chavez, Vice Mayor Gary Giovanetti and Lt. Dennis Smallie visited the River City Patient Center in Sacramento.

Besides its appropriate location in a semi-industrial area, the club boasts an armed guard, strict requirements to show a medical marijuana card and a whole lot of pot.

"It just seemed weird to be seeing them pull out drawers of little canisters of marijuana," said Giovanetti, fascinated. "It's such a taboo kind of thing."

The vice mayor added the club sells marijuana in canisters, brownies, cookies and liquid form.

But to get to the point, "It didn't seem like it's a rogue, criminal enterprise," Giovanetti said. "All the customers looked pretty normal."

Smallie agreed. "It seemedlike it was a very well-run facility."

The Stockton contingent also met with Sacramento narcotics officers who said they tried to sting the club but found it operated legally, as far as they can tell.

Giovanetti still has concerns. What if a corrupt Stockton doctor writes prescriptions to all comers?

There are several good answers to that. Corrupt doctors falsely certify healthy workers eligible for workers' compensation, too. Worker's comp remains legitimate.

And numerous Stockton doctors, including oncologists with reputations above reproach, are quietly writing medical marijuana prescriptions to needy patients.

It bears repeating that the National Academy of Science studied marijuana in 1999 and found it had legitimate medical uses.

Besides, what if some potheads do manage to buy their pot from a well-managed pot club instead of through pushers? Weakening pushers, the modern equivalent of Prohibition gangsters, doesn't sound like such a bad thing.

Chavez, who was formerly Stockton's police chief, said the trip eased his qualms somewhat.

"I think we can definitely say that it increased an openness toward - I'm looking at other issues - but certainly being more open toward it," said Chavez.

The mayor said he's asked city staff to answer his lingering questions. Within a couple of weeks, he hopes to have enough information to make a decision.

"Personally, I'm not at the point where I'm yea or nay on it," Chavez said.

Kudos to those who made this fact-finding trip. Facts, scientific and legal, not politics and prejudice, are the way to find the right policy on a Stockton dispensary.

The politics are there, though.

California voters approved Proposition 215 statewide, but conservative San Joaquin County voted it down.

On the other hand, District Attorney James Willett released a position paper saying he'll allow a medical marijuana dispensary, as long as it's nonprofit.

His sensible recommendations for investigating cultivation and possession of marijuana cases also instructs officers to lay off Proposition 215 growers and users - as long as they can show their ID cards and prescriptions, and don't have too much pot.

The date of this memo's release also shows the district attorney has a sense of humor. He released it on April 20, 2006 - 4/20. 420 is a widely known code word for pot.

__________________

 

troublemaker_42

See, thats where I think some of the biggest misconceptions concerning marijuana occur. Until people witness it firsthand, I don't believe most people not involved with the culture of cannabis have an accurate sterotype of the "typical" cannabis consumer. They don't see us for who we really are......their Dr's, lawyers, insurance agents, school teachers, cooks, mechanics, plumbers, electricians, city council members, the list could and does go on forever.....there is no "typical" pot smoker out there. The number one reason why the customers at this establishment looked "pretty normal" is because we ARE normal people. The fact that we choose to use cannabis for whatever reason doesn't somehow segregate us from the general population, or make us less "normal" than our next door neighbor and her giant jar of Xanax, or the little old lady down the street that drinks a few cups of coffee every morning. We're no less normal than the guy who stops off after work for a beer or two once in awhile. We're no less normal than they guy who enjoys his herbal teas or fine wines, or his favorite cigars. Why are we envisioned as some sort of outcast because our source of relaxation or stimulation doesn't match our neighbors, even though we could be interchangable in many other ways? Especially, when, in all reality, our vice really has fewer detrimental effects than pretty much any of the other examples I have provided. WE ARE normal people....We ARE your next door neighbors....we're not some underground subculture....we're as mainstream as anyone who enjoys an illegal activity can possibly be.

Buzzby

This sounds contradictory. Do cannabis users represent a culture or not?

troublemaker_42

Ok, admittedly, that does sound contridictory. I for one believe that latter statement. Prehaps rather than "the culture of cannabis" it would have been more accurate to say "those naive of the cannabis scene" or some such thing. My overall point however, remains the same no matter what the wording....the reasion these people "appeared normal" is bwecause they are. Cannabis use doesn't make anyone less normal than the average person, and I dare say I know many cannabis users that are much more "normal" than many non-cannabis users I have known over the years.

Buzzby

I don't know if "normal" is the right term because normal means "conforming to norms". Using cannabis is not (yet) one of our society's norms.

I'm not sure what the right term would be. My candidates would include: benevolent, benign, harmless, and innocuous.

Medical marijuana users are even more likely than recreational users to appear "like anybody else". They're not necessarily involved in any of the aspects of "cannabis culture". They could just be getting their medicine.

 

dedbr

Yes. Most assuredly.

Some Where In Ded Land......

__________________
"Starry, starry night, Paint your pallet blue and gray, Look out on a summers day,
With eyes that know the darkness of my soul, Shadows on the hills, Sketch the trees and the daffodils, Catch the breeze and the winter chill, In colors in the snowy linen land......"

Vincent.... Don Mclean


Posting Guidelines!

JackBauer

What was with the junior mints? Did they get contact munchies or something?