| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,556
Grams: 23,691.78 Groans: 1
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 144
Thanked 795 Times in 443 Posts
| Medical marijuana blocked Emergency ban gives city time to deal with complex issue 12.29.06|Midway Driller Emergency ban gives city time to deal with complex issue By Doug Keeler Midway Driller Editor You can't sell marijuana in Taft now, even if it's for medicinal purposes. The Taft City Council passed an emergency ordinance last week to ban the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries for the next 45 days. Chief of Police Bert Pumphrey requested the emergency ordinance, which went into effect immediately and required a four-fifths vote of the council. The ordinance prohibits the current businesses from providing the drug as well as the opening of a business for the purpose of dispensing marijuana. The council voted 5-0 to approve the request. Pumphrey said the city recently received at least one inquiry from a person interested in opening a marijuana dispensary in the city. Proposition 215 (the Compassionate Use Act) in 1996 allows for the use of marijuana for seriously ill people, but it is very ambiguous about how the marijuana is to be provided. Pumphrey said the proposition makes no mention of dispensaries or businesses that sell the drug, but does allow caregivers to provide it to ill people. “But it isn't clear on the definition of a caregiver,” Pumphrey said. To add to the confusion, while state law may permit the use and dispensing of marijuana for medicinal purposes, federal law does not. That could put cities in the position of violating federal law if they permit medical marijuana dispensaries, City Attorney Kathy Gibson warned the council before it voted. In fact, she said, a public agency could conceivably even be prosecuted for “aiding and abetting” marijuana sales. Pumphrey and city attorney Kathy Gibson both said there are court cases pending that will probably lead to a decision on which law - state or federal - supersedes the other one. The confusion over the law and what it permits, and whether state law will supersede federal law has resulted in a variety of actions. According to the staff report Pumphrey prepared for the council, cities and counties in the state have taken a variety of actions - some have permitted the distribution of marijuana for medicinal purposes and other have not. Pumphrey said Wednesday that he will probably ask the council to extend the ban on marijuana dispensaries for up to two years to allow the city to draft a comprehensive policy to regulate it. He said he will seek a very restrictive ordinance similar to the city's adult entertainment ordinance. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CO: Amendment 44 A Cloud of Smoke | Lothar121 | The Drug War Headline News | 4 | 10-26-2006 05:56 PM |
| AUS: Cracking Down On Cannabis | Lothar121 | The Drug War Headline News | 2 | 02-14-2006 04:33 PM |
| SD: Government Claims About Marijuana Are a Lie | Lothar121 | The Drug War Headline News | 3 | 05-17-2005 08:31 PM |
| Any tokers in the northen chicago suburbs? | Vex | Places and People | 1 | 08-28-2004 10:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |