Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-11-2007, 04:17 AM   #1
Lit_Match
Moderator
 
Lit_Match's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,528
Grams: 21,707.83
Groans: 1
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Lit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation God
Thanks: 144
Thanked 728 Times in 417 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default NM: State Workers Could Face Charges for Marijuana Law

State Workers Could Face Charges for Marijuana Law
08-10-07|Associated Press|By Deborah Baker

The state Department of Health and its employees could face federal prosecution for implementing New Mexico’s new medical-marijuana law, the attorney general has cautioned.

And they wouldn’t get any help from the attorney general: That office isn’t authorized to defend state workers in criminal cases, according to a letter released Thursday.

New Mexico as of July 1 has a medical-marijuana program run by the state Department of Health that not only legalizes the use of marijuana by certain patients but provides for state-licensed production and distribution of the drug.

Thus far, 48 patients have applied for the program, and half have been approved, according to the department. Seven applicants were rejected, and 17 have been asked to provide more information.

The approved patients get temporary certificates allowing them to possess a three-month supply of marijuana, including plants.

The law requires the department to issue rules by Oct. 1 for licensing producers and developing a distribution system.

That provision is unique among the dozen states that have legalized medical marijuana, and department officials asked the attorney general at the end of May to assess their exposure to prosecution.

In a letter dated Aug. 6, lawyers in Attorney General Gary King’s office said the department and its employees or representatives “may be subject to federal prosecution for implementing the Compassionate Use Act.”

There was no immediate reaction from the department.

“We’ve just received the letter, and we’re going to discuss what our next step will be,” said spokeswoman Deborah Busemeyer.

The letter said the U.S. Supreme Court has concluded the manufacture and distribution of marijuana — even for medical use — is illegal, and federal authorities have prosecuted citizens for growing medical marijuana.

While medical-marijuana proponents might argue that federal authorities have shown little enthusiasm for prosecuting patients — and no interest in prosecuting states for setting up registries and identification card programs — the department or its employees could be prosecuted, the letter said.

“The production and distribution of marijuana is still a crime at the federal level ... and that is something that state laws can’t change,” said Tom Riley, spokesman for the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

“Whether or not a case is brought is up to the U.S. attorney and the Department of Justice,” he said.

Two weeks ago, federal agents raided 10 medical-marijuana clinics in Los Angeles, arresting clinic owners and managers but not patients.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration says the clinics are distribution points for illegal drugs.

White House drug czar John Walters criticized Gov. Bill Richardson in April for signing the bill, calling it irresponsible and saying it would worsen the state’s illegal drug use problem.

Walters also claimed Richardson — who is running for the Democratic nomination for president — was trying to curry the favor of wealthy marijuana-legalization advocates.

The law requires the Health Department to develop a medical-marijuana distribution system with production facilities “within New Mexico housed on secure grounds and operated by licensed producers.”

Distribution of marijuana would take place at locations designated by the department.
__________________
Donation links to NORML (The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws) | MPP (Marijuana Policy Project)



Lit_Match is offline Award Lit_Match Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 08-11-2007, 07:25 AM   #2
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,799
Grams: 37,983.62
Groans: 26
Groaned at 37 Times in 31 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 452
Thanked 3,040 Times in 1,570 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Unfortunately, it will probably take this kind of confrontation between a state and the federal government to get any kind of movement on legalizing marijuana.

State workers, doing their jobs under state law, being arrested by the DEA, is publicity you couldn't buy for any amount of money. The legislature voted for the medical marijuana bill and the governor signed it. I'd love to see the DEA march into the New Mexico statehouse and try to arrest Governor Bill Richardson. Sure, New Mexico vs. the US Government is not an even match, but it would put medical marijuana on the front page of every newspaper in America, on the front cover of every news magazine, and the lead story on every news program.

Considering that 80% of American voters surveyed favor medical marijuana, this might actually get them to do something about it.
__________________
McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time.
Do we really want four more years of the same old shit?

~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008

Buzzby is online now Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Buzzby For This Useful Post:
Tokamak (08-13-2007)
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:38 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52