| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Hot Products! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| |
| | #1 |
| Unf*ckwit'able ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,691
Grams: 34,919.42 Thanks: 1,569
Thanked 1,712 Times in 924 Posts
| Marijuana should be legalized 10-2-`07 | RedAndBlack.com | by Patrick Dever According to a study by Harvard professor Jeffrey Miron, the government will spend approximately $8.61 billion in 2007 on marijuana prohibition enforcement. Despite such robust government spending, current strategies have failed to curb marijuana consumption. In 2005, 16.9 percent of Americans surveyed in National Household Surveys on Drug Use and Health admitted to using marijuana in the last year compared with 13.2 percent in 2000. Data from drug treatment facilities indicate that marijuana abuse is also increasing. According to a Drug and Alcohol Information System study, admission rates to drug treatment for primary marijuana users have increased by more than 162 percent since 1992. Based on correspondence with University professors in the economics department, my personal analysis of the marijuana prohibition law is that its flawed economic policy will continue to lead to unaccomplished initiatives. Police target sellers of marijuana because each dealer distributes to numerous consumers. But this policy is ignorant to economic agents: every time a drug dealer is arrested, supply decreases and price goes up, which only limits consumption by raising prices to consumers. However, a study by Mert Daryal reveals marijuana, like all drugs, has price inelastic demand, meaning that consumers are relatively insensitive to price change - thus the billions of taxpayer dollars spent on enforcement have minimal effect on consumption. As an economics major and the center director for domestic issues in the Roosevelt Institute, the University's think tank organization, I've done some research in this field. I believe decriminalizing marijuana will allow the United States to most effectively attack marijuana use and abuse through education and health care. These health care and educational programs can be funded through a tax placed on the sale of marijuana in conjunction with reduced enforcement costs, which I estimate to increase government revenue by $6 to $13 billion. I feel increased marijuana education more effectively will decrease consumption through increasing the public's perceived risk of marijuana. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reports that students exposed to anti-drug messages are 25 percent less likely to use the drug, a much greater reduction than has been observed through marijuana prohibition. Preferences and perceived risk determine drug use, not the law. A study by Daryal found that only 0.3 percent of the college students he surveyed, whom had never tried marijuana, would begin to use marijuana if it were decriminalized. The danger with marijuana, as with alcohol, is when people use the drug irresponsibly. While proper education will help to eliminate some of this risk, I feel it is important to fund programs and clinics to help cure marijuana abusers of their addiction. According to the National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study, "Treatment appears to be cost effective, particularly when compared to incarceration," meaning health care reduces marijuana abuse better than marijuana enforcement laws can. While most people may be willing to agree with the logic above, there are still many people who feel that the government should not enact policies that support drug use. I would argue there are plenty of legal activities, such as flag burning, which the government does not condone, but permits because of an essential over arching value, such as the importance of free speech. I feel the U.S. government should permit the decriminalization of marijuana, if they truly wish to fulfill their over arching initiative of creating a safer America by reducing marijuana use and abuse. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #2 | |||||||||||||||||
| Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 269
Grams: 5,087.22 Thanks: 30
Thanked 88 Times in 60 Posts
| Quote:
No comment. VV Last edited by Victor_vicious : 10-03-2007 at 02:15 PM. | |||||||||||||||||
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,815
Grams: 91,271.37 Thanks: 997
Thanked 6,799 Times in 3,141 Posts
| Quote:
Public education seriously reduced the number of people who smoke cigarettes. Why? Because the PSAs and other ads told the truth: smoking tobacco can kill you. Public education seriously reduced the number of drunk drivers on the road. Why? Because they told the truth: driving drunk can get you and others killed, you can lose your driver's license, pay heavy fines, and go to jail. I'm wondering what they can say truthfully about marijuana that will discourage people (especially young people) from using it. The physical and psychological consequences simply aren't that dire. An approach similar to the drunk driving one might help to keep people from driving when they're too stoned, but not discourage people from smoking. The only honest PSA I've seen come out of the ONDCP is the one where people let their lives slip by couchlocked while others are out doing something interesting. The rest have been total BS and anyone with half a brain knows it.
__________________ 60% of the people of America now say we are heading toward a depression. Not a recession, a depression. We are in desperate need of profitable industries that we can tax. Um... Now can we legalize pot? ~ Bill Maher | |
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |