Go Back   Marijuana.com > News > The Drug War Headline News
FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-09-2007, 06:10 PM   #1
Hashishi
Unf*ckwit'able
 
Hashishi's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,997
Grams: 23,455.20
Groans: 4
Groaned at 7 Times in 7 Posts
Hashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputationHashishi has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 816
Thanked 971 Times in 563 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default CA: Oxnard expected to ban medical marijuana center

Oxnard expected to ban medical marijuana center
Conflict between state, federal drug laws cited
10-9-`07 | Ventura County Star | by Charles Levine

The Oxnard City Council will likely vote to ban medical marijuana dispensaries tonight, citing an unresolved legal conflict between state and federal laws.

"We have worked to try and figure it out, but I think it is now to the point where Oxnard is not big enough to take on the federal government," said Councilman Dean Maulhardt, one of two members who hoped the city could allow a dispensary.

"I can't support putting Oxnard in the middle of that conflict," Maulhardt said Monday.

The conflict Maulhardt refers to is this: In 1996, California voters approved the Compassionate Use Act, which allows patients suffering from a host of diseases, such as cancer or AIDS, to use marijuana with a doctor's recommendation.

In 2003, Sacramento lawmakers followed by adopting a law that establishes identification cards for users. Thirty-five of California's 58 counties have implemented the program. Ventura County is not among them.

But the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that federal laws against all marijuana use take precedence over the state initiative.

"The contradiction between the state and federal laws is the problem for us, and we're not ready to get tangled in that right now," Oxnard Planning Manager Sue Martin said Monday.

A San Diego judge ruled in December that the state law is legal, but San Diego County has appealed the ruling.

Oxnard began researching the issue in 2005, after a medical marijuana user inquired about opening a dispensary. Council members adopted a temporary ban on such facilities while city planners, lawyers and law enforcement officials researched the issue.

The panel extended the ban twice. It is set to expire next month.

The city has received at least six inquiries from other users about opening dispensaries.

Meanwhile, a staff report for tonight's hearing cites other problems: Federal drug officers have stepped up raids of known dispensaries. Crime goes up in cities that allow them.

And Ventura County has not implemented the identification card program, also bowing to the conflict over state and federal laws.

Camarillo resident Lisa Schwarz, a former registered nurse and founding member of Ventura County Alliance of Medical Marijuana Patients, said she wasn't disappointed in the city's recommendation.

"And I don't blame them," Schwarz said Monday, citing increased raids by federal agents on dispensaries.

State agencies apparently don't track the number of dispensaries. However, Aaron Smith, a statewide organizer with Safe Access Now, which advocates implementing the California laws, estimates that roughly 400 dispensaries operate in California with some 300 concentrated in Los Angeles County.

Smith said he was disappointed by Oxnard's recommendation, arguing that a permanent ban would violate the spirit if not the letter of state law.

"Oxnard is a subdivision of the state of California, not the federal government," Smith said. "The City Council needs to uphold and implement state laws. They're not an arm of the federal government.
__________________
Hashishi is offline Award Hashishi Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 10-10-2007, 04:56 PM   #2
hash pancakes
New Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 35
Grams: 1,439.05
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
hash pancakes can see the Karmic Tunnel of Life
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Was it Prop 187 that was voter-approved yet shelved by the governor because it was against federal law? That was the one that denied medical care, etc. to illegals. It surprised me that Prop 215 didn't meet similar fate. Oh poor Oxdardians, what to do? Do you notice how cities that are immersed in illegal drug trades are so against this? Like San Diego, Merced, etc.
hash pancakes is offline Award hash pancakes Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 AM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52