| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,502
Grams: 20,567.78 Groans: 1
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 144
Thanked 667 Times in 387 Posts
| Frank Defends Proposal To Decriminalize Marijuana 3-23-08|CannabisNews.com|By The Associated Press Rep. Barney Frank is defending a bill he plans to file this week decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana, saying the federal law unfairly targets those using medical marijuana in California. Frank, who filed a bill to decriminalize marijuana as a member of the Massachusetts Legislature in the 1970s, said the decision whether to make possession of the drug illegal should be left up to the states. He also said the federal government shouldn’t have a law on the books that is rarely enforced and which doesn’t make sense to large portions of the public. "Do you really think people should be prosecuted for smoking marijuana? I don’t think most people agree with that. It’s one area where the public is ahead of the elected officials," Frank said in an interview with The Associated Press. "It does not appear to me to be a law that society is serious about." Frank said he was particularly troubled by federal law enforcement agencies targeting those using marijuana as a legal medical treatment under California law. "I don’t think smoking marijuana should be a federal case," he said. "There’s no federal law against mugging." Marijuana use is illegal under U.S. law, which does not recognize the medical marijuana laws in California and 11 other states. The Drug Enforcement Agency and other U.S. agencies have been shutting down major medical marijuana dispensaries throughout California in the last two years and charging their operators with felony distribution charges. Frank first announced the bill on the HBO show "Real Time," hosted by Bill Maher. Frank’s comments come as pro-marijuana activists are pushing a ballot question that would decriminalize possession of an ounce or less of marijuana in Massachusetts. Instead of facing a criminal record, those caught with a small amount of marijuana for personal use would instead pay a civil fine of $100 — much like a traffic ticket. Supporters say the measure would save the state millions of dollars in law enforcement costs and spare thousands of state residents from the burden of a criminal record. Critics, including the head of the anti-drug education group DARE-Massachusetts, say they oppose decriminalizing any amount of marijuana because it could send a signal to children that smoking pot is no big deal. They say they while not everyone who smokes pot will end up shooting heroin, almost no heroin addicts begin with the more dangerous drug. Activists pushing the initiative point to more than two dozen nonbinding referendum questions placed on local ballots in Massachusetts in the past six years. In each, a majority of voters supported the idea of decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana. About a dozen states have already adopted similar laws. Asked about the marijuana ballot initiative last December, Gov. Deval Patrick said he had to consult with his Public Safety Secretary Kevin Burke and Secretary of Health and Human Services Dr. JudyAnn Bigby before staking out a position. "I think they are both skeptical," he said at the time. The ballot question isn’t the only effort under way to ease the state’s drug laws. A bill working its way through the Statehouse would also decriminalize possession of an ounce or less of the drug, but set a higher fine of $250. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 |
| New Member Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 50
Grams: 908.35 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Finally something of real value is being done. The real chances of this actually passing are probably pretty slim but at the very least I hope it opens up publicly larger debates that the media will actually cover. It may be a long shot but this is exactly what needs to be done. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| New Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
Grams: 778.80 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Well, we are not at the emerald city quite yet, but at least we are making progress. I think this constant introduction of legislation at least means that public support is going in the right direction and legislaters on both sides are paying attention. However, do not become too enthusiastic because these bills are just steps not the landing. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| New Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 53
Grams: 832.60 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 15
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
| I don't think an ounce is enough, and a $250 fine, hell I could almost get an ounce of good bud for that. Make it 6 ounces and up to 3 mature 30 imature plants, and then anything over that a 1k fine and I'll be cool with that. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,613
Grams: 36,626.32 Groans: 26
Groaned at 34 Times in 29 Posts
Thanks: 436
Thanked 2,791 Times in 1,468 Posts
| The actual proposal calls for 100 grams, which is about 3.5 ounces. NORML Teams Up with Rep. Barney Frank To Introduce Fed Decrim Bill
__________________ "Say, don't you remember, they called me Al; it was Al all the time. Say, don't you remember, I'm your pal? Buddy, can you spare a dime?" ~ Yip Harburg, 1931 |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |