Pompo

Medical Marijuana: House Judiciary Chair Calls Out DEA on California Raids
5/9/08|StoptheDrugWar.org|

Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), the powerful chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has sent a letter to the DEA questioning its priorities and asking for an accounting of costs incurred in the dozens of raids it has launched against California medical marijuana patients and providers in the last two years. The letter could be the prelude to hearings on the topic, if medical marijuana defenders, including a number of elected officials, have their way.


John Conyers, Photo courtesy of Google

In the April 29 letter to DEA Acting Administrator Michele Leonhart, Conyers wrote that he received numerous complaints from Californians, including elected officials, about "DEA enforcement tactics" regarding raids on medical marijuana dispensaries. The Californians were urging him to hold hearings, the chairman told Leonhart, but first, "I want to give you the opportunity to respond to these complaints."

Noting an increase in "paramilitary-style enforcement raids against individuals qualified to use medical marijuana under state law, their caregivers, and the dispensing collectives established to provide a safe place to access medical cannabis," as well as the sending of letters threatening property confiscation or even arrest to hundreds of landlords who rent to dispensaries, Conyers had a handful of pointed questions:

** Is the use of asset forfeiture, which has typically been reserved for organized crime,
appropriate in these cases? Has the DEA considered the economic impact of forfeiture in a stalled economy?
** "Given the increasing levels of trafficking and violence associated with international drug cartels across Mexico, South America, and elsewhere," is this really where the DEA wants to spend its resources?
** Has the DEA considered the impact of its tactics on the ability of California state and local entities to collect lawful taxes on an economic activity legal under state law?
** Given increasing support for medical marijuana from medical associations and in the scientific literature, and the acting director's discretion in prioritizing DEA activities, "Please explain what role, if any, scientific data plays in your decision-making process to conduct raids on individuals authorized to use or supply cannabis under state law?"

Conyers also appears to call for an inter-governmental commission composed of lawmakers, law enforcers, and people affected by medical marijuana policy "to review policy and provide recommendations that aim to bring harmony to federal and state laws." Such a commission could be part of a process that eventually brings a relaxation of federal medical marijuana policy.

"Finally," Conyers concluded, "attached with this letter is a list of approximately 60 raids the DEA conducted between June 2005 and November 2007. Please provide an accounting of the costs, in dollars and resources, used to conduct law enforcement raids on the attached list of individuals. Please include information about: whether any arrests were made in the course of these raids, and, if so, how many people were arrested; under what circumstances was a warrant issued and for what content; whether any criminal or other charges have been brought by the DOJ; what, if any, content was seized or destroyed; and finally, the current status of these cases."

Also attached to the letter were statements condemning the DEA raids from the Los Angeles City Council, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums, and a resolution from the California legislature.

Ordinarily, one would not expect the DEA to be quick to reply to such inquiries, even from someone like Chairman Conyers. But with the threat of possible hearings hanging over its head, perhaps the agency will find the courtesy of a reply the lesser of two evils.

Buzzby

With the bills introduced by Rep. Barney Frank and this inquiry into the DEA's role in interfering with state medical marijuana policies, I am feeling very hopeful. It may not be this year or the next, but serious reform at the federal level seems to be on the way. Non-interference with state medical marijuana policies would be a major step forward. That's been promised by both Democrats running for the Presidency. If Frank's bills or similar ones pass, it would be a monumental step forward.

__________________

kcbennie

I totally agree with Buzzby. This is huge! THings are really picking up momentum. My guess would be two to five years.

__________________
"My friend 'This is a picture of me when I was younger.' Every picture is of you when you where younger. Show me a picture of you when you were older."

- Mitch Hedburg

carlover_36

It's about time our Government Officials, specificaly the DEA, started asking for some accountability. And, as ya'll before me said, this could be a giant step forward.

__________________
Stay Stoned