| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Hot Products! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Unf*ckwit'able ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,691
Grams: 34,919.12 Thanks: 1,569
Thanked 1,711 Times in 924 Posts
| That's pretty much all I've got to say on the matter. The police have my DNA, fingerprints etcetera on record. That's a state requirement (on arrest). It's a state requirement I in no way agree with, but one I'll abide by because it's meted down by those representing my best interests. ( )When it comes to corporate drug testing, though, I draw the line. The only people to have the right to invade your privacy on such an intimate level should be the state (and I'd still argue that one). Here in Britain it's practically unheard of, and I have a strong feeling that if companies here followed the same route as has been taken in the states the issue would end up in parliament. Thoughts? |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||