| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Hot Products! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
| | #1 |
| c21-h30-o2 ![]() Tournaments Won: 1 Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,587
Grams: 8,418.97 Thanks: 574
Thanked 600 Times in 374 Posts
| ok so my friend just called me... he got busted with 2 oz of marijuana and a quarter oz of Oregon kush. not for selling he told me but he had it in seperate bags cuz thats the way he got it. now the way he got busted is he was rolling a j of kush to try it out when a cop opens his door pulls him out searched him and his car, turns out they were expecting a drug deal!!!! however he was not who they wanted they just got lucky.is this unlawful search in any way ?? and what is he in for? they say courts backed up so im guessing he could get it thrown out for not being quick enough (i read that in the constitution) but its his first offense so best and worst outcomes ?? ughhh cops piss me off |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #2 |
| 0tolerance4BS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,984
Grams: 50,519.30 Thanks: 2,952
Thanked 4,183 Times in 2,025 Posts
| If the cops observed him rolling a joint, its in no way unlawful. They saw him breaking the law, and took action. Why would this be illegal? if I was a cop and saw observed someone breaking the law, why couldn't I arrest them? I mean....thats what cops DO!! And the court syustem may be backed up, but that certainly doesn't mean your firned will get the case dismissed in this case. People have a right to a speedy TRIAL...most simple possession cases are plea bargined way before the point of a trial, and very few cases are ever dismissed becasue of this. Even as backed up as the court system may be, its doubtful this proivision of the Constitution will play any roll whatsoever. AS far as what kind of trouble he's in...ummmm....welll......theres ABNSOLUTELY no way of knowing remotely what he could be facing without knowing the state, the local attitudes towards marijuana by the courts, his exact charges, etc. Thers no generic answer for "How much trouble is someone in if they get caught with 2.25 ozs of marijauan in seperate baggies?" because theres FAR too many varibales involved And...just a quick ? What on earth do you mean he had 2 oz's of "marijuana" and a 1/4 oz of "Oregon kush"? Wouldn't that just be ....2.25 ozs of weed?
__________________ Ted Nugent: "To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." If total government control equals safety, why are prisons so dangerous? |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to troublemaker_42 For This Useful Post: | Sec (08-21-2008) |
| | #3 |
| c21-h30-o2 ![]() Tournaments Won: 1 Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,587
Grams: 8,418.97 Thanks: 574
Thanked 600 Times in 374 Posts
| well the marijuana is was just some mersh, low grade, and the oregon kush was well, kush so idk 2.25 oz of pot i guess and the state is arizona and the city is tucson |
| | |
| | #4 |
| New Member Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 91
Grams: 2,333.25 Thanks: 10
Thanked 44 Times in 18 Posts
| I'm afraid the troublemaker is right. Even if the police are somewhat suspicious that something is going on in that car, such as papers on the dashboard or the smell eminating from the car, they have the right to search (they do need a reason, this is a reason). So to assume that somebody with the materials in their hands may be able to get off is nothing short of naive. Sorry to say it, but your friend is just another casualty in the unending drug war. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #5 | ||
| 0tolerance4BS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,984
Grams: 50,519.30 Thanks: 2,952
Thanked 4,183 Times in 2,025 Posts
| Quote:
Probable cause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Quote:
Arizona - NORML | ||
| | |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troublemaker_42 For This Useful Post: | BigGun1 (08-22-2008), Unriggable (08-20-2008) |
| | #6 |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 150
Grams: 3,595.08 Thanks: 2
Thanked 44 Times in 29 Posts
| I don't know, if the dude gets a decent enough lawyer he might get it dismissed. Might. Speaking in purely hypothetical terms, if the cop just went and opened the door thinking it was someone else, isn't that unreasonable search. Lets say the cop didn't even see the dude rolling, just up and opened the door. The weed could have been ordinary rolling tobacco, I've known a few people who store there tobacco in a baggie. |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| 0tolerance4BS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,984
Grams: 50,519.30 Thanks: 2,952
Thanked 4,183 Times in 2,025 Posts
| Quote:
Nope, no dice. From what I understand, the officersd WERE in the area scouting an alleged drug deal. however, just becasue they were there for an unrelated reason doesn't mean they cannot take enforcement action if they observe the law being broken right in front of them. If he was in the process of rolling a joint at the time of his arrest, chances are the cops had actually been watching him for a few minutes and had gathered everything they needed to make a valid arest. Its not an unreasonable search when the officers aren't searching anyone, but merely arresting someone they have observed breaking the law. Theres nothing in the OP that lead me to believe that the cops did anything wrong. I'm quite familiar with the law and its application. I have a BA in criminal justice and have worked in the criminal justice system up until a marijuana arrest made it difficult for me to continue to do so. Under these circumstances, its not very likely your friend will be successful in arguing that the search was unreasonable, when the officers were testify to the fact that they observed the suspect " sitting in his carrolling a cigarette with a green leafy susbtance, assumed marijuana and upon confronting this individual, the substance was indeed to found to be marijuana, and another 2 ozs of the substance was also found in his possession in addition to the bag discovered in his lap." (can you tell I've read one too many testimonies in my day?) ![]() Last edited by troublemaker_42 : 08-20-2008 at 10:25 AM. | |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to troublemaker_42 For This Useful Post: | BigGun1 (08-22-2008) |
| | #8 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 862
Grams: 13,977.92 Thanks: 23
Thanked 365 Times in 111 Posts
| Okay, the police were doing surveillance in the area for an expected drug deal. Then, when they swoop in, your friend just happens to be there with 2+ ounces of weed packaged in separate bags? I don't believe for a second that "he was not who they wanted they just got lucky." I think he is exactly who they wanted, and they got exactly what they were looking for. Anyone care to take that bet? |
| | |
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to phuzz01 For This Useful Post: |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #9 |
| Don't fear the reefer Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 853
Grams: 8,445.30 Thanks: 285
Thanked 309 Times in 164 Posts
| Arizona is pretty tough, well the toughest laws in the South West anyway. Sound like he's screwed. If he's willing to spend 3k+ on a GOOD lawyer, and actually kept his mouth shut once he was arrested, a good lawyer could probably get him a reduced sentence or probation if it's his first offense.Less if the cops made a mistake in processing the evidence and the lawyer is sharp. Public defender and he talked to the officer, expect a bad outcome. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 150
Grams: 3,595.08 Thanks: 2
Thanked 44 Times in 29 Posts
| Quote:
Anyways, chalk this up as a damn good reason not to smoke/roll in your car. | |
| | |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NoobMcGee For This Useful Post: | BigGun1 (08-22-2008), Plainsman1963 (08-20-2008) |