| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| June 6, 2005 To: NORML Supporters From: Allen St. Pierre, Executive Director, NORML Hello, Today the United States Supreme Court ruled that federal law continues to prohibit the use of cannabis?even for the sick, dying and sense-threatened. The first Associated Press story related to this morning's breaking news is found below along with NORML's reply. As Justice Steven's writings for the court below indicate: "Perhaps even more important than these legal avenues is the democratic process, in which the voices of voters allied with these respondents may one day be heard in the halls of Congress." It is hard to argue with Justice Stevens' point. Per usual, the greatest gains for cannabis law reform are to be made by achieving legislative changes in the law rather than looking to the courts for relief. In light of this, it is imperative that you contact your member of Congress today and urge him or her to support the States' Rights To Medical Marijuana Act, which would reschedule marijuana under federal law and protect patients in states with medical marijuana laws. Please take two minutes to send your member of Congress a pre-written letter today by visiting: http://capwiz.com/norml2/mail/onecli...lertid=7531001 Thirty-three years after NORML launched the 'medical marijuana' debate by suing the federal government to re-schedule cannabis, regrettably that debate will apparently continue due to this morning's United States Supreme Court decision. Challenges to cannabis prohibition laws are principally funded by citizens who support a change in the status quo regarding cannabis so please continue to provide the valuable resources, to NORML and other cannabis law reform groups, which are needed to keep pushing hard for these social reforms. Regards, -Allen F. St. Pierre Executive Director NORML Washington, DC | |
| |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 |
| May be habit forming ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,894
Grams: 19428.6699999991 [Check]
Groans: 159
Groaned at 37 Times in 34 Posts
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 1,782 Times in 952 Posts
| Thanks to your link, my representative has heard how i feel. Everyone here should do the same. Unless we voice our concerns and feelings, we'll continue to be viewed as criminals, which, in fact, we are.....unless we work for change. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 269
Grams: 1919.35 [Check]
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
| This is the response I got: June 6, 2005 Dear Serafina: Thank you for contacting me about efforts that would legalize the use of marijuana for the treatment of severe illnesses. I appreciate your concern about this important issue. Like you, I have read reports that state marijuana can have therapeutic effects in the treatment of cancer and serious diseases. Although tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana, is reported to have some beneficial medicinal effects, there are many effective and suitable alternatives. For this reason I am not certain that legalizing the use of marijuana -- a controlled, illegal substance -- is necessary or prudent at this time. Nevertheless, I appreciate your helpful comments and will consider your views should this issue be debated by the Senate in the future. Again, thank you for contacting me. Sincerely, Pete V. Domenici United States Senator Ugh. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Don't take the "auto response" too much to heart -- basically it states that your rep has received the letter -- and that in itself confirms that you as a constituent have let your voice (and your VOTE) be heard. You now know what this elected official feels about OUR important issue. Will you vote for them again? Probably not. Will you tell others not to vote for them? Probably. Loss of votes equals this person being out of a job Enough votes mean that a politiian will change their view -- or not be re-elected. That is the point. You toke...you should Vote... Keep up the good work -- and anyone else who get's a reply, pleae post so we can keep track of who is supporting us and who needs to be voted out of office. | |
| |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #6 |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,171
Grams: 8373.85000000038 [Check]
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,514 Times in 1,781 Posts
| In general, politicians pay attention to the opinions of their constituents. The number of messages in favor of medical marijuana may well influence his vote. My sister was a Senatorial aid and told me how things work. From the moment they get elected, Senators are thinking about winning the next one. Staying in office is paramount. Voting his conscience is secondary, if the politician in question has a conscience.
__________________ McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time. Do we really want four more years of the same old shit? ~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008 |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |