| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Sr. Member ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,006
Grams: 10,388.27 Groans: 1
Groaned at 10 Times in 9 Posts
Thanks: 110
Thanked 84 Times in 73 Posts
| ok so we have a female officer in our area that is patting down men, i thought this was against the rules, she also never has backup, she has done it to my brother and his friend (with good reason) and his friends step-dad, that time without reason, she has also done this to a few other guys that my parents know my question is that in the state of california is this legal, and if not than if she finds anything on you is it still admissible, i belive its illegal in my state but not sure, they are supposed to have a male officer come from my understanding |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 900
Grams: 6,037.45 Groans: 0
Groaned at 11 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 18
Thanked 199 Times in 108 Posts
| It is legal.
__________________ In nature, stupidity is a capital crime; judgement is absolutely impartial, there is no process for an appeal, and the sentence is carried out immediately. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,171
Grams: 42,651.79 Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,514 Times in 1,781 Posts
| When a law enforcement officer has "reasonable grounds" for suspecting that a criminal suspect may be armed, he may pat down the outer layer of the suspect's clothing for weapons. The ruling (Terry v. Ohio) held that the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a pat-down is performed based on reasonable suspicion for the purpose of ensuring officer safety.
__________________ McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time. Do we really want four more years of the same old shit? ~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008 |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Buzzby For This Useful Post: | chadwick (12-28-2007) |
| | #4 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 829
Grams: 5,811.72 Groans: 1
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 15
Thanked 252 Times in 90 Posts
| Some agencies have internal policies stating that when feasible, officers should have a colleague of the same sex search people. However, those policies would not make any contraband found inadmissable. And I am not aware of any state that has a law requiring an officer of the same sex conduct a search. Finally, even agencies that have such a policy make an exception when an officer of the same sex is not immediately available. A pat search is for officer safety purposes, not for locating contraband. Therefore, if an officer has to conduct a patdown for their own safety, they cannot afford to wait ten minutes for another officer to arrive. |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to phuzz01 For This Useful Post: | chadwick (12-28-2007) |
| | #5 |
| Sr. Member ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,006
Grams: 10,388.27 Groans: 1
Groaned at 10 Times in 9 Posts
Thanks: 110
Thanked 84 Times in 73 Posts
| well thanks for the help, i wasnt quite sure on the laws about this but i get it a little more clearly now |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |