| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 992
Grams: 9,942.47 Groans: 1
Groaned at 10 Times in 9 Posts
Thanks: 109
Thanked 81 Times in 70 Posts
| ok so we have a female officer in our area that is patting down men, i thought this was against the rules, she also never has backup, she has done it to my brother and his friend (with good reason) and his friends step-dad, that time without reason, she has also done this to a few other guys that my parents know my question is that in the state of california is this legal, and if not than if she finds anything on you is it still admissible, i belive its illegal in my state but not sure, they are supposed to have a male officer come from my understanding |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 892
Grams: 5,468.70 Groans: 0
Groaned at 11 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 18
Thanked 183 Times in 103 Posts
| It is legal.
__________________ In nature, stupidity is a capital crime; judgement is absolutely impartial, there is no process for an appeal, and the sentence is carried out immediately. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,773
Grams: 37,806.72 Groans: 26
Groaned at 35 Times in 30 Posts
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,000 Times in 1,555 Posts
| When a law enforcement officer has "reasonable grounds" for suspecting that a criminal suspect may be armed, he may pat down the outer layer of the suspect's clothing for weapons. The ruling (Terry v. Ohio) held that the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a pat-down is performed based on reasonable suspicion for the purpose of ensuring officer safety.
__________________ McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time. Do we really want four more years of the same old shit? ~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008 |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Buzzby For This Useful Post: | chadwick (12-28-2007) |
| | #4 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 824
Grams: 5,326.35 Groans: 1
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 14
Thanked 236 Times in 86 Posts
| Some agencies have internal policies stating that when feasible, officers should have a colleague of the same sex search people. However, those policies would not make any contraband found inadmissable. And I am not aware of any state that has a law requiring an officer of the same sex conduct a search. Finally, even agencies that have such a policy make an exception when an officer of the same sex is not immediately available. A pat search is for officer safety purposes, not for locating contraband. Therefore, if an officer has to conduct a patdown for their own safety, they cannot afford to wait ten minutes for another officer to arrive. |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to phuzz01 For This Useful Post: | chadwick (12-28-2007) |
| | #5 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 992
Grams: 9,942.47 Groans: 1
Groaned at 10 Times in 9 Posts
Thanks: 109
Thanked 81 Times in 70 Posts
| well thanks for the help, i wasnt quite sure on the laws about this but i get it a little more clearly now |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |