Go Back   Marijuana.com > Home > Legal Issues
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2007, 12:42 PM   #991
ninfan77
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 358
Grams: 2,060.52
Groans: 2
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
ninfan77 has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 12
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Well, you really are addressing 2 seperate issues here.

1. Dogs
2. Airports

1a) The dog can and will smell all of that. The real question is, has the smell leaked out of the container enough for the dog to notice it?

1b) Most of this thread is in regards to human interdiction. Safely making it from point a to point b while travelling domesitically (usually in the USA). TSA/LEO is what we are concerned with on these flights. The chances of you coming up close and personal with a DRUG dog are slim. Bomb dog, yea you're gonna see him.

If you want to try to beat both the human and canine factors, my really only good suggestion is to handle your bud with gloves, then dispose them gloves before touching anything else, being careful not to touch your bag.

Double vacuum sealing this within a few hours of leaving for the airport, then shoving that little bundle right down your pants. You can wrap it up if you want this concealment is really up to you. Just make sure you can sit/stand/take shoes off without looking like you DO have something shoved down your pants.


However, i'd say you are REASONABLY safe when flying domestically from a drug dog, as they just aren't hanging around most airports especially small outstations. Wrapping your bud up nice and good, and crotching it w/out vacuum packing is just fine.

Remember, what you are doing is currently ILLEGAL in the USA. Is it fair, of course not. But its what we have to live within right now. Be safe, Be smart.


Quote:
Originally Posted by dingus1017 View Post
what about prescription bottles? The ones from walgreens have caps that can be used upside-down to make the bottle air-tight. Couldn't you put weed in there, screw it closed and airtight, then put the bottle in a plastic bag, then put it in a jar of peanut butter or a bottle of shampoo? It doesn't seem that dogs could possibly smell it through all that.
ninfan77 is offline Award ninfan77 Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 03-16-2007, 02:36 AM   #992
ipunchfatkids
New Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Grams: 648.05
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
ipunchfatkids has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

hey im new here and flying from jfk to hawaii for spring break. i wanted to know if there is a change in security risk since hawaii is on the islands
ipunchfatkids is offline Award ipunchfatkids Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 03:17 AM   #993
BartSimpson
Sr. Member
 
BartSimpson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 899
Grams: 5,975.30
Groans: 0
Groaned at 11 Times in 3 Posts
BartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks: 18
Thanked 199 Times in 108 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ipunchfatkids View Post
hey im new here and flying from jfk to hawaii for spring break. i wanted to know if there is a change in security risk since hawaii is on the islands
Domestically, your destination does not matter.

And Hawaii is an island.
__________________

In nature, stupidity is a capital crime; judgement is absolutely impartial,
there is no process for an appeal, and the sentence is carried out immediately.
BartSimpson is offline Award BartSimpson Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 03:24 AM   #994
Scotty_D
New Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Grams: 647.95
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Scotty_D has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default Hey

Do you think that a dog could smell weed through a vacuum sealed bag inside a bag?

Anyways, the best way to find out the best way to smuggle is to get a bag full of something legal, herbs or something, and put it in your bags, spread a little pot smell on a shirt, smellin like pot isnt illegal. And go on the plane. One of us is bound to take a flight soon, try it, I will.
Scotty_D is offline Award Scotty_D Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 11:47 AM   #995
ninfan77
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 358
Grams: 2,060.52
Groans: 2
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
ninfan77 has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 12
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

You do know that you can be flagged in the reservations system if TSA wants you to be. Hassles for the rest of your life or until they remove you.. which sometimes is the rest of your life.

And to answer the vacuum seal, yes if the bag was properly handled, no trace on the outside, the dog will EVENTUALLY smell the weed. Smell will be contained for a little while, how long, who knows. If you double or triple vac it, you increase your chances that this timeframe is longer than the travel time of said package.
ninfan77 is offline Award ninfan77 Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 03-17-2007, 03:08 AM   #996
Thunderlungs
New Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Grams: 647.85
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thunderlungs has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

I've been doing this for thirty years, domestically and internationally.

Internationally, at first -- and more out of paranoia than anything else -- I did the tighty-whitey method. Single tighty-whitey, that is, with as much as an ozer keeping my johnson company. This was back in the early 80s. Worked fine, of course.

I've flown internationally since 9/11 and have simply folded up a single ziplock (probably never containing more than 3 g., tops) inside a thick, rolled-up sock, whose traveling companions were a few other rolled-up/balled-up socks. I've done this several times in both checked and carry-on luggage -- and while traveling to Colombia of all places -- without incident.

The sniffing dogs are, IMHO, overblown paranoia.

I've also flown domestically since 9/11 with a couple of joints buried in the back of a pack of smokes. I put the pack in the small accessory tray that follows or precedes the carry-on through the x-ray and have never had a problem.

However, I have not flown for two years. My fear now is that things have ratcheted up in the interim, at least as far as x-raying carry-on and checked luggage and, of perhaps greatest concern, one's own person.

The tighty-whitey method has always the best fallback when one felt paranoid. But my concern now is not (nor has it ever been) the dogs, but rather these new x-ray machines that screen your person and essentially virtually strip you naked.

So my question is: Has anyone done the tighty-whitey method in the face of these things? And what did you use? Just a ziplock?

Yours in his 35th Anniversary of Smokedom,
Thunderlungs
King of All Bongsmen
Thunderlungs is offline Award Thunderlungs Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2007, 03:44 AM   #997
BartSimpson
Sr. Member
 
BartSimpson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 899
Grams: 5,975.30
Groans: 0
Groaned at 11 Times in 3 Posts
BartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond reputeBartSimpson has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks: 18
Thanked 199 Times in 108 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderlungs View Post
I've been doing this for thirty years, domestically and internationally.

Internationally, at first -- and more out of paranoia than anything else -- I did the tighty-whitey method. Single tighty-whitey, that is, with as much as an ozer keeping my johnson company. This was back in the early 80s. Worked fine, of course.

I've flown internationally since 9/11 and have simply folded up a single ziplock (probably never containing more than 3 g., tops) inside a thick, rolled-up sock, whose traveling companions were a few other rolled-up/balled-up socks. I've done this several times in both checked and carry-on luggage -- and while traveling to Colombia of all places -- without incident.

The sniffing dogs are, IMHO, overblown paranoia.

I've also flown domestically since 9/11 with a couple of joints buried in the back of a pack of smokes. I put the pack in the small accessory tray that follows or precedes the carry-on through the x-ray and have never had a problem.

However, I have not flown for two years. My fear now is that things have ratcheted up in the interim, at least as far as x-raying carry-on and checked luggage and, of perhaps greatest concern, one's own person.

The tighty-whitey method has always the best fallback when one felt paranoid. But my concern now is not (nor has it ever been) the dogs, but rather these new x-ray machines that screen your person and essentially virtually strip you naked.

So my question is: Has anyone done the tighty-whitey method in the face of these things? And what did you use? Just a ziplock?

Yours in his 35th Anniversary of Smokedom,
Thunderlungs
King of All Bongsmen

Nice post. We always need experienced travelers to help with the info. The issue with putting it in your luggage is the human factor. Some luggage is searched by hand, and when they find your special sock, it is proof they might have found a bomb.

The inexperienced traveler's over-emphasis on drug dogs is telling of contemporary threat assessment by stoners.

As far as backscatter machines are concerned, there is only one location in domestic service at this time (PHX) and sources indicate that the units are working well; but that contraband in the private parts is not being entertained. Searches are limited to prohibited items. A baggie is apparent in the training displays, according to my sources, but persons who elect the backscatter machine are self-selecting and likely not carrying MJ.

The limit might be in what is good for the airline business. If persons choose to travel by means other then the airline industry, airlines would suffer, and pressure the TSA to lighten up - on a local outstation level very effectively.
BartSimpson is offline Award BartSimpson Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 09:10 PM   #998
drixdaz
New Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Grams: 649.70
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
drixdaz has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default Well...

I have a key chain thats no larger than an inch and an half...its a tiny pill case...and i can put this cap thing on it that makes it look less deep than it actually is...if you break your bud into little nugs lets say 2-4cm large you can easily fit an 8th in here...i havent done it yet for i have just purchased this little devil.

im going to dc and i want to just take 2 grams...maybe some comments?
drixdaz is offline Award drixdaz Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 11:46 AM   #999
ninfan77
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 358
Grams: 2,060.52
Groans: 2
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
ninfan77 has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 12
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Key chains are metal. It'll get X rayed. I'd say no to using it.
ninfan77 is offline Award ninfan77 Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 10:28 AM   #1000
DankDealer
New Age Krunk
 
DankDealer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 562
Grams: 2,864.05
Groans: 1
Groaned at 3 Times in 1 Post
DankDealer is as kind as they come
Thanks: 140
Thanked 120 Times in 85 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Keep your bud on you..dont be putting it in things that are going to go through an Xray machine...thats just asking to get caught.

I flew to St maarten last week and was just fine with a nice sack in my shorts pocket underneath my jeans. It works every time for me
__________________
"What is this.......a dooby run?" - Babs Murray

Always keep your words soft and sweet incase u have to eat them
DankDealer is offline Award DankDealer Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 AM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52