Go Back   Marijuana.com > Home > Legalization/Decriminalization
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2008, 09:38 AM   #1
willium
New Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
Grams: 262.95
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
willium has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Question Just a thought..

I notice that in many arguments over legalisation/decriminalisation of marijuana for recreational use, people look to statistics showing how many people are killed as a result of alcohol, tabbaco and prescription medicine. The statistics show that many more people are killed each year than are killed from marijuana and other drugs. (sorry i dont have exact figures but im sure you have all seen them )
Has anyone ever thought that this just suggests that things such as alcohol and tabbaco are so harmful that they should also be illegal?
The fact that they are not illegal even though they are clearly more harmful than drugs such as Marijuana proves that the tax revenue is worth too much to the government.
What I cannot understand is why such money hungery governments dont want to legalise Marijuana to make even more tax revenue?

But i supose that why were all here though?? lol.
willium is offline Award willium Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:11 PM   #2
kcbennie
Member
 
kcbennie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 292
Grams: 2,667.90
Groans: 4
Groaned at 3 Times in 2 Posts
kcbennie has a brilliant futurekcbennie has a brilliant future
Thanks: 125
Thanked 56 Times in 34 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

The reason that the argument that alcohol and tobacco are so dangerous poses no threat of those substances being criminalized, is because of the massive ramifications that alcohol prohibition caused the first time around. If you took away peoples booze and smokes, there would be anarchy like this country has never seen. As far as the possible tax revenue that is ignored by congress, that money is ignored because none of it would go into their personal pckets, unlike the lobby contributions that they get from big pharma, the tobacco industry, the alcohol industry, the logging industry, the oil industry, the cotton industry, the corn industry (ethanol). Did I forget anyone?

our government =
__________________
"My friend said 'Man, the weather is really trippy' and I said 'The weather's not trippy. It's just the way that you perceive the weather that is in fact trippy.' And then I though to myself 'I should've just said 'Yeah.''"

- Mitch Hedburg
kcbennie is offline Award kcbennie Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:09 PM   #3
hittwicebutdontcough
New Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Grams: 1,356.97
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
hittwicebutdontcough 's reputation is growing everyday
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Well it is also fairly easy to get marijuana in the states. Especially in places like California, Colorado, and Alaska. Im 18 and it's easier to get weed then alcohol. Who knows, maybe if they start being hard on stoners and taking away our green then there maybe some anarchy in the U.S. We are not as alone as we think we are.
hittwicebutdontcough is offline Award hittwicebutdontcough Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 01:51 AM   #4
shibshib
Sr. Member
 
shibshib's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,112
Grams: 12,396.05
Groans: 39
Groaned at 9 Times in 7 Posts
shibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulate
Thanks: 282
Thanked 483 Times in 294 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

The only true way to arguing legalization of marijuana is to not focus on how much more harmful other legal substances are (since this will inevitably lead to either the statement, "I don't think those should be legal either!" or "So you think more people should die?"

You should, rather, focus on the studies and realistic logic surrounding how safe marijuana is.
shibshib is offline Award shibshib Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shibshib For This Useful Post:
kcbennie (07-22-2008), SpiralArchitect (07-25-2008)
Old 07-25-2008, 07:17 PM   #5
SlowRide
New Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 74
Grams: 627.90
Groans: 4
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
SlowRide has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 98
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Well i think if people really knew why marijuana was really outlawed in the first place, and if these facts were presented to the right people, we could see some change. OBviously, its true that alcohol and tabacco are significantly more harmful, people just dont understand that the reputation of marijuana has been so misconstrued to cover up the real reason for its outlaw. MArijuana was outlawed due to HArry J Anslinger, who used the defense that "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."
But most people dont know, or care to know, the truth behind it all.
SlowRide is offline Award SlowRide Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 07-25-2008, 09:12 PM   #6
stonerStories
New Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
Grams: 323.45
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
stonerStories has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 8
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

The reason is simple. Beer and cigs are pretty hard to make at home. Pot isn't.

They'll always be able to tax the things we can't make ourselves. But most people would want to grow their own pot, and that just messes up their whole money thing.

If you want to know the reason behind anything in theis world, just follow the money...or the lack of it in this case.

:>
stonerStories is offline Award stonerStories Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 09:25 PM   #7
shibshib
Sr. Member
 
shibshib's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,112
Grams: 12,396.05
Groans: 39
Groaned at 9 Times in 7 Posts
shibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulateshibshib Is a member to emulate
Thanks: 282
Thanked 483 Times in 294 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonerStories View Post
The reason is simple. Beer and cigs are pretty hard to make at home. Pot isn't.

They'll always be able to tax the things we can't make ourselves. But most people would want to grow their own pot, and that just messes up their whole money thing.

If you want to know the reason behind anything in theis world, just follow the money...or the lack of it in this case.

:>
That is another weak argument... if the government/lobbyists were that worried, they would simply pass another bill regulating home use/growing like they do with other plants.

There is a certain type of tree around where i live that is a completely legal tree... you just can't grow them on your property. Somethign about their root systems being a problem on pipes.

I also doubt most people would want to grow their own. I mean, I know a lot of people want to... but I don't think its the majority. I myself would not want to spend that much time on it, or even learn the craft. I'd rather just buy bud. It's not a hobby.

Also, if you add on the fact that marijuana would be greatly reduced in price if it was ever legalized... it wouldn't be economical for people to grow their own... unless they did so on massive scales, or it was a hobby.
shibshib is offline Award shibshib Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shibshib For This Useful Post:
SpiralArchitect (07-25-2008)
Old 07-25-2008, 09:28 PM   #8
stonerStories
New Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
Grams: 323.45
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
stonerStories has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 8
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Permits are generally local things. It doesn't help the feds or the state at all.

And even if it were legal to own but not grow, it would be much harder for the gov to track down.
stonerStories is offline Award stonerStories Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 10:06 PM   #9
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,184
Grams: 42,755.74
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,786 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hittwicebutdontcough View Post
Who knows, maybe if they start being hard on stoners and taking away our green then there maybe some anarchy in the U.S.
You don't think that busting 820,000 of us last year was being hard on stoners?

Prohibition doesn't work. It doesn't cut off the supply of the prohibited substance. It merely raises the price. There was plenty of alcohol available during alcohol prohibition.
__________________
McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time.
Do we really want four more years of the same old shit?

~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008

Buzzby is offline Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Buzzby For This Useful Post:
Vicki (07-25-2008)
Old 07-25-2008, 10:16 PM   #10
Buzzby
Buddhist Curmudgeon
 
Buzzby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,184
Grams: 42,755.74
Groans: 33
Groaned at 42 Times in 35 Posts
Buzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputationBuzzby has entirely too much reputation
Thanks: 486
Thanked 3,538 Times in 1,786 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonerStories View Post
The reason is simple. Beer and cigs are pretty hard to make at home. Pot isn't. They'll always be able to tax the things we can't make ourselves.
Really? Home brewing beer is a popular hobby. You can produce 200 gallons of it a year per household without paying any taxes. You can legally grow your own tobacco. The reason people generally buy beer and cigarettes instead of making their own is convenience and the fact that, even with taxes, their prices are easily affordable.

Quote:
But most people would want to grow their own pot, and that just messes up their whole money thing.
Most people buy their produce from stores, even though they could grow it in their own gardens. What leads you to think marijuana users would be any different? The fact that people can produce their own pot means that retail prices, including taxes, would have to be low enough that the added convenience of buying it commercially outweighs the cost.

Quote:
If you want to know the reason behind anything in theis world, just follow the money...or the lack of it in this case.
There's no reason marijuana couldn't be taxed in the same way as alcohol and tobacco. The state would make a lot of money even if some percentage decided to grow their own. The money to follow in this case is that going into the campaign coffers of our representatives from powerful lobbies whose industries would be challenged by legal marijuana.
Buzzby is offline Award Buzzby Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Buzzby For This Useful Post:
JohnBoySmoker (07-26-2008), O High O (07-26-2008), Vicki (07-25-2008)
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40 AM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52