| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #21 |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 134
Grams: 1,411.47 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
| it would be great if it passed and i live in nh but i dont think that anything like that is going to be passed soon |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #22 |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 423
Grams: 674.30 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| If that happens, I am totally moving to New Hampshire when i turn 18 in 4 months. This is really encouraging. Did you read that article? That police officer said that marijuana use is related to violence. Yes, he would be correct. Here's how: because marijuana is illegal, gangs sell marijuana illegally. Disputes over gang turf lead to violence. If marijuana were legalized, it would not only allow police to concentrate on violent crime, but actually reduce violent crime. Drug dealers will find that their market for marijuana is gone because everyone will be buying it legally from stores. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| New Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 96
Grams: 852.65 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| I highly doubt it'll pass. New Hampshire's too conservative. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 890
Grams: 3,492.89 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 22
Thanked 57 Times in 40 Posts
| Isn't New Hampshire a fairly progressive state? Like in Nevada it didn't pass because there are still a lot of red necks outside of Las Vegas. This probably the biggest leap so far in the legalization movement if it passes.
__________________ "Penalties against possession of a drug should not be more damaging to an individual than the use of the drug itself." -- Jimmy Carter ![]() RIP 420.marijuana.com![]() ![]() ![]() RIP overgrow.com![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 300
Grams: 1,306.07 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
So decriminalizing would run parallel to the beliefs of one of the most beloved libertarian economists, Milton Friedman. I think it has a better chance than in most states, but we'll see. Thaaa | |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #26 |
| Maître d'Causerie Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 903
Grams: 9,792.48 Groans: 1
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 228
Thanked 267 Times in 154 Posts
| Heh, totally forgot that no one else would've posted this... Near the end of March, the bill was ruled against by the security committee, in a 4-1 vote. However, all four of the people who voted against the bill said that they agree that serious marijuana reform is necessary in our state, but the proposed bill just was too much all at once. They recommended that the proposers come back with a more toned down bill next year, and chances are it will probably pass. Honestly, no one expected this bill to pass. It really is too much at once-it's nearly complete legalization, and while I don't know what sort of government checks were included in the bill, I doubt it was enough, and the House committee cited the lack of enough controls was the main reason for rejection of the bill. I think that the vast majority of us on here can agree that marijuana should not be sold to minors, but I do not think the bill had even that much restriction. There were some hopefuls- myself included- but we really knew it had no chance. More important, though, is the fact that the bill was actually received warmly by the committee. Maybe they were just scapegoating, but let us assume for the moment they were honest. In that sense, then they all only rejected the bill on the grounds of technical matters. This speaks favorably for future, more moderate measures. Unfortunately, we can not be certain that even if the house committee HAD voted for the bill that it would pass in the house at large, for reasons that are also unfortunately artificially created by the Federal gov't. Also on the table in March was a medical marijuana bill that failed in the house in a 186-177 vote. The reason it didn't pass? A sizeable number of those voting against did not want to vote for it because they did not want to go against the federal laws in the matter. If the federal gov't had not led raids against the Californian medical marijuana clinics, then the bill would have passed. I am, quite frankly, a bit disappointed that this is what stopped the bill from passing. New Hampshire has a history of being very free minded and libertarian, against increasing the power of the central gov't. This is a major reason why we are traditionally viewed as conservative, but have voted largely democratic the last two elections- conservatives generally stand for smaller gov't, but the Bush administration has actually increased the size and power of the federal gov't, losing our support. As a self-described libertarian myself, who believes that the more local the power is the better, not passing a bill because of how they are afraid how the federal gov't would respond does not sit well with me. However, seeing the DEA's actions in California, I have to admit their fears are justified, and it's fairly obvious that they are trying to do what they believe is best for the citizens of New Hampshire. So, all in all, I am left hopeful for next year, but uncertain of how things will go. It's probably going to depend upon how things go elsewhere in the country, such as in California. However, I am certain that marijuana reform of some sort will happen in the near future in the state of New Hampshire.
__________________ ![]() It matters not how strait the gate, How charged with punishments the scroll, I am the master of my fate; I am the captain of my soul. |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Jr. Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 129
Grams: 671.95 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
I would possiblt consider moving back to the US my guess is that laws will be like i think in Alaska it is legal in your home, if im not mistaken. | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 408
Grams: 1,702.55 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
Nothing like that would ever happen here in WV... ![]()
__________________ "It's okay to eat fish cause they don't have any feelings." | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 390
Grams: 1,286.85 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
| I hear you; I dwell in southern WV. Maybe someday, just maybe.
__________________ People put their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution; they don't put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 408
Grams: 1,702.55 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CA: Marijuana activists' feud goes to court | Migz420 | The Drug War Headline News | 2 | 04-26-2007 02:42 PM |
| doritosman!? | lowgear | Places and People | 1 | 01-02-2003 02:15 PM |
| stor-y- friday? | TennesseSkilles | Creative Writing | 3 | 05-07-2002 07:19 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |