| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Banned Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 788
Grams: 8,442.97 Groans: 11
Groaned at 24 Times in 13 Posts
Thanks: 86
Thanked 135 Times in 86 Posts
| To my knowledge, its still legal to smoke tree in Denver, without legal consiquences. The government says it just to test how it would be if weed was legal. But I think its legal in places like Denver, and oakland, and seattle because the police cant handle it anymore. They lost the war on drugs, and instead of just admitting that they lost, they decided to cover their own asses saying its ok to smoke in these citys!, because then it will look like they still have control. what do you guys think?? ![]() |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 |
| Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 356
Grams: 3,636.83 Groans: 2
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 8
Thanked 51 Times in 35 Posts
| Any changes to the laws are because enough people who are pro-marijuana got up and did something about it. Its not like the police or the government up and said "hey its legal now!" one day, it was through voting and word of the people. And the government isn't really testing it because under federal law its still illegal
__________________ Every time you say "dro" or call your weed "hydro" when you aren't positive it was hydroponically grown you're killing the stoner community. Killing it. Bastard.Team SMOKE POT Captain - Join and help fight the good fight! ![]() Last edited by KMKbuzz4-2-0 : 09-23-2007 at 10:50 PM. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| ~~~_\|/_~~~ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tournaments Won: 4 Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,483
Grams: 49,439.72 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 3,737
Thanked 2,096 Times in 977 Posts
| Quote:
First of all the residents of Denver voted for The Alcohol-Marijuana Equalization Initiative allowing adults over the age of 21 to possess up to an ounce of marijuana and making it lowest priority for police. Not because the gov't or police wanted to test it. Second it's only legal state wise if you have a medical card so if you don't you can still be fined and receive jail time because city law does not override state law. Third it's still very much illegal federally so there is a risk of legal consequences. We still have a ways to go. Marijuana Law Reform - NORML Marijuana Policy Project - Home
__________________ | |
| | |
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Broliette For This Useful Post: | 420godfather (09-23-2007), Buzzby (09-23-2007), dinkydew1 (09-29-2007), sugratefulldime (09-23-2007), Trocisp (09-24-2007) |
| | #4 |
| the Grey ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tournaments Won: 7 Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,646
Grams: 50,374.76 Groans: 10
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 1,693
Thanked 1,216 Times in 689 Posts
| Weed isn't legal in Denver at the moment. They're working on it though ![]() Denver Voters To Decide On Pot ‘Deprioritization’ Ordinance This short article is a quick read ![]() |
| | |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Pompo For This Useful Post: |
| | #5 | |||
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,773
Grams: 37,806.72 Groans: 26
Groaned at 35 Times in 30 Posts
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,000 Times in 1,555 Posts
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time. Do we really want four more years of the same old shit? ~ Buzzby, 08/31/2008 | |||
| | |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Buzzby For This Useful Post: |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #6 |
| Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 356
Grams: 3,636.83 Groans: 2
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 8
Thanked 51 Times in 35 Posts
| Very much truth. A lot of people misunderstand and think decriminalization and such are the same as all out legalization and thats the case. |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to KMKbuzz4-2-0 For This Useful Post: | Trocisp (09-24-2007) |
| | #7 |
| Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 388
Grams: 4,716.20 Groans: 1
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 5
Thanked 103 Times in 70 Posts
| well, yes, it is. the police just tend to ignore that little fact and prosecute under state law. the current initiative does nothing to override the state law either.
__________________ united we toke, divided we choke. |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| the Grey ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tournaments Won: 7 Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,646
Grams: 50,374.76 Groans: 10
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 1,693
Thanked 1,216 Times in 689 Posts
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 388
Grams: 4,716.20 Groans: 1
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 5
Thanked 103 Times in 70 Posts
| just because a governing body doesnt respect the law of a region does not make the law any less valid. it IS legal, on the city level. a lot of people look at the city/state thing as the state being the parents that own the house, and a city being the kid that lives under that roof. the only difference is that the citizens of denver who voted to remove penalites for adult possession of the herb WE ARE NOT KIDS!!!! the city enacted the ordinance. leo just chose to ignore it. but once again, that does not mean that the law does not exsist. if it is not legal, then why would it be listed in the state government pages, as a law? colorado revised statute 18-18-406 specifically states that penalties for marijuana posession will be excluded for people over the age of 21 Last edited by tokinGLX : 09-24-2007 at 09:22 PM. |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to tokinGLX For This Useful Post: | chronicking415 (09-27-2007) |
| | #10 |
| Mommy's Little Monster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tournaments Won: 6 Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,972
Grams: 76,547.22 Groans: 8
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 900 Times in 565 Posts
| We agree Tokin, that the voters of Denver voted to make it legal, but in the eyes of the Denver Police it is still illegal, they will still arrest you for possesion. Petition drive to make marijuana possession Denver's lowest law enforcement priority Wednesday, May 30, 2007 Petition drive to make marijuana possession Denver's lowest law enforcement priority Citizens for a Safer Denver is holding a press conference later this week to kick off a new petition drive. The proposed initiative would make adult marijuana possession Denver's lowest law enforcement priority. Their press release is excerpted below: The proposed measure would create a new city ordinance designating private adult marijuana possession Denver's lowest law enforcement priority. Approximately 4,000 valid signatures of registered Denver voters will be required to qualify the initiative for the ballot. Prior to the press conference, at 8:30 a.m. in the Denver City & County Building, a 21-year-old Denver woman will plead "not guilty" to charges of possession of less than one ounce of marijuana. Sara Tafoya was cited for marijuana possession in Denver after police stopped her on an unrelated traffic matter (for which she was not cited) and found about one-eighth of an ounce of marijuana in her purse. Ms. Tafoya was arrested and handcuffed. She was kept in a police squad car for more than 90 minutes while the police had her car impounded, then she was taken to jail where she was held overnight. Four officers and three squad cars were on the scene when she was arrested, and she was forced to pay a $200 bond to get out of jail and $300 to retrieve her car from the Denver impound. "Using so many of our city's limited resources to arrest and jail a harmless citizen like Ms. Tafoya is an outrage," said Citizens for a Safer Denver spokesman Mason Tvert. "This type of incident is a perfect example for why we need to enact this initiative." "If police can refrain from citing people after they leave our Mayor's bar a little 'Hicken-loopy' -- public intoxication is, in fact, illegal -- there is no reason why they can't refrain from citing adults who are simply possessing a small amount of pot," Tvert said. "We appreciate that our police are out there working to keep us safe, but we believe they could better spend their time arresting drunk drivers and violent offenders than adult marijuana users." Seattle voters approved a similar "lowest law enforcement priority" initiative in 2003, and the number of marijuana arrests and prosecutions have dramatically decreased in the city without any negative fallout. The measure there was supported by multiple members of the city council and the state legislature, and those city officials who opposed the measure have since recognized its implementation as safe and effective. Denver voters approved Initiative 100 in 2005, calling for the removal of all penalties for private adult marijuana possession in the city. Since then, arrests for such behavior have increased in Denver, and there were more marijuana arrests in the city in 2006 (the year following the initiative) than ever before. WHEN: Thursday, May 31, noon (12 p.m.). Ms. Tafoya's arraignment, at which she will be pleading "not guilty," is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. WHERE: In front of the Denver City-County Building, 1437 Bannock Street. Ms. Tafoya will be appearing in the general municipal courtroom in the Denver City & County Building.
__________________ I smoke 2 joints in the morning, I smoke 2 joints at night. I smoke 2 joints in the, afternoon it makes me feel allright.I smoke 2 joints in time of peace and 2 in time of war.I smoke 2 joints before I smoke 2 joints then I smoke 2 more. Hard work good, hard work fine, but first take care of head. 420 Bookie Administrator Last edited by Hookahs : 09-24-2007 at 09:19 PM. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |