Marijuana.com

Monk

So, from what I have read, the Supreme Court is going to start the case for the constitutionality of prohibition of cannibus on teusday. I'm not familiar with the system up north, so does anyone have any idea how long it will take for this case to be finished up and ruled on?

monk

__________________
I have known war as few men now living know it. It's very destructiveness on both friend and foe has rendered it useless as a means of settling international disputes.
- General Douglas MacArthur

 

8 1/2

something like 6 months...the arguments will only be a day or two but then the judges go away and research, think etc...then come back with a decision...

check out marijuananews.com for more on this...you'd probably have to search for it...

WNB

It's not too likely that the current supreme court will legalize it, constitutional or not. The fact remains that they're so conservative that they can barely agree that sodomy should be legal. If they barely allow sodomy, you can forget about legalizing pot.

The constitutionality of the subject doesn't matter, never has, and never will. Middle America is too much against legalization, due to reefer madness. Conservatives constantly reinforce marijuana myths, and hold puritan views directly opposed to legalization.

__________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

Monk

WNB- It's the canadian supreme court that is looking at this, not the american (your post made it look like you thought this was american).

on another note, will the public be able to see a transcript of the procedings after they have heard both sides of the case?

monk

Proline63

You lucky canadian bastards... you're well on your way to legalization. What I want to know is when America will catch on?

__________________
Hey, you remember that time when... Oh. No, probably not- you were passed out.

 

ZeroCulture

With the current government .... never.

Mr.Mojorisin

Rad avatar man, thats an awesome movie

Want to now the stupidest thing Ive heard regarding this?

Some moron MP/politician said something along the lines of this isnt a choice for the people and opinion polls backing legalization/decriminalization shouldn't sway the governments decisions.

What a moron, hes basically saying that the will of the people is crud and the government should do what it wants.

__________________
"There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors." Jim Morrison

"I believe in the near future, the government will use anti-drug hysteria to set up a police state" author William S. Burroughs, 1947.

ZeroCulture

Thanks!

----

That is horrible ... did he/she get away with that saying? Did someone point out that that MP lacks a few brain cells?

MrIMStoned

Who is this moronic MP? or MPP?

__________________
"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?"