| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Hot Products! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Banned Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 16
Grams: 37.20 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| I recently read an article about how marijuana smoke is more dangerous than cigarette smoke. It said that marijuana smoke has a better chance of giving you lung cancer because it has a certain chemical in it. What do you guys think? |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #2 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 40
Grams: 32.25 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Actually tobacco is more dangerous because it contains one of the worst chemicals u can put in yer body...nicotine...this hardens artery's and is very additctive marijuana smoke isn't.....tobacco smokers chain smoke which is bad fer yer lungs....weed smokers only smoke until there high and do not always get high in the same day or even week....plus since weed is illegal all of most have to hide to smoke it and we only smoke a little so we don't get caught....MARIJUANA is 100% better than that nasty $hit tobacco |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,299
Grams: 2,556.80 Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
| That a common tactic prohibitionists use, but there has never been a study done (to my knowledge) that proves marijuana smokers have a greater chance of getting cancer than tobacco smokers.
__________________ "All you do is head straight for the grave, a face just covers a skull awhile. Stretch that skull cover and smile."--Jack Kerouac, Visions of Cody |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 348
Grams: 2,279.35 Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| I read an article that said if you smoked an equal amount of tobacco and marijuana, that the pot would have 4x the amount of tar as the tobacco. However, a single cig is packed so tightly that it would be nearly impossible to get that much in a joint. Plus pot smokers rarely smoke more than one or two joints, and cig smokers usually smoke packs at a time. I don't think they have proven that pot smoke even causes cancer, but I could be wrong. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #5 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,299
Grams: 2,556.80 Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
| Technically, they haven't even proven carcinogens cause cancer. A lot of people who get it were exposed to them, but a lot of people who don't have cancer also were. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| I'm sure smoking (anything) isn't good for your lungs. I'm sure the same amounts of weed probably do yeild a lot more tar than cigarettes. But I think whoever said the reason weed is probably less harmful is because cig cmokers smoke way more than pot smokers was probably right. | |
| |
| | #7 |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 645
Grams: 3,996.43 Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
| I believe that a joint is equal to 1.5 cigs but the cancer patients are usually people smoking 1 pack or more a day. I believe that is 20 cigs (not sure cuz I don't smoke cigarettes), no one is going to smoke 30 joints in a day, everyday. 0 people have died from Marijuana use, there's proof that marijuana is less likely to kill than tobacco. Hustler, this isn't the correct forum to post this in, you should have posted this in Chemical and Physiology (or something along those lines. But since I'm not a moderator I don't have the power...yet ![]()
__________________ Slow down You move too fast Got to make the morning last Just kickin' down the cobble stones Looking for fun and Feelin' Groovy |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Cigs are really adicttive and that makes u smoke one after another after another after another...... and so on but even if weed is worse on ur lungs than tobacco, in the long run tobacco will kill u and weed will barely slow ya down, because most people dont smoke joints one after another after another etc. like tobacco chain smokers do. | |
| |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #9 |
| Seasoned Activist ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,413
Grams: 6,391.85 Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
| IŽm pretty sure that anything smokeable is bad for the lungs, but i read that weed has more tar than cigs but i also read that anything left over from a cig is tar, that yellow crap on the filters and the ashes. so i dont know much about this. But a person who smokes cigs smokes about 14+ a day and a hardcore toker maybe 5 joints that arent as big as cigs "But why ruin your lungs and not get high ruin your lungs and have a great time" Quote by DoritosMan
__________________ another tasteless and odorless latin american I pity the fool that dont use the search engine! |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 40
Grams: 32.25 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| actually oxygen isn't good for your lungs either....the air we breathe is 76% nitrogen and only 5% oxygen....the other % is other gases...if u did breath in more oxygen it will suffocate u slowly....and marijuana doesn't have as much tar as tobacco has *(there has been proven studies of this fact by the FDA)* and marijuana doesn't have fertilizers, fiber glass particles, rat poison and other **** u won't dare touch in it like tobacco has... |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| will I pass? In need of some positive reinforcement! | stankydank | Urine Testing | 3 | 06-23-2006 09:44 PM |
| Analyzing validity of "Negative" test result | StllSmkN | Urine Testing | 8 | 05-26-2006 01:10 AM |
| imprtant question about UA testing and recent hospitalization | Cornczech | Urine Testing | 7 | 09-30-2004 11:05 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |