DOJ to States: We Won’t Challenge Your Marijuana Laws

Posted by Monterey Bud & filed under Marijuana Laws, marijuana legalization, Marijuana News, marijuana politics.

Weed - DOJ to States: We Won’t Challenge Your Marijuana Laws

Oh my, things have just gotten interesting…

The Justice Department will not attempt to challenge state laws that allow for the medical and recreational use of marijuana as long as the drug sales do not conflict with eight new federal enforcement priorities.

Those include the distribution of marijuana to minors and sales that assist or act as cover for trafficking operations, according to a directive being issued Thursday to federal prosecutors across the country.

So what about Washington and Colorado?

Although the directive issued by Attorney General Eric Holder will apply nationwide, it will largely affect the 20 states and the District of Columbia that allow for medical marijuana use, and Colorado and Washington where state laws allow medical and recreational use by adults.

A Justice official, who was briefed on the directive but not authorized to comment publicly, said Holder briefed the governors of Colorado and Washington earlier Thursday on the new prosecutorial directive in a conference call. Federal prosecutors were expected to begin briefing authorities in other states later Thursday. Source:

The new directives will not alter marijuana’s CSA classification as a schedule #1 narcotic, noted the Dept of Justice. However the new directive effectively discourages cases from being pursued in the event of personal, non-violent pot consumption, that shows no relationship to “criminal gangs or cartel operations.”

The DOJ’s 8 high priority areas of enforcement will be:

Preventing the distribution of marijuana to minors

Preventing revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises, gangs, and cartels

Preventing the diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some form to other states

Preventing state authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity

Preventing violence and the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of marijuana

Preventing drugged driving and the exacerbation of other adverse public health consequences associated with marijuana use

Preventing the growing of marijuana on public lands and the attendant public safety and environmental dangers posed by marijuana production on public lands

Preventing marijuana possession or use on federal property

Comments 21 Comments so far... Add Yours

  1. 2buds

    Bullshit is right.

    Just a couple questions for you Mr Holder. To help us gauge your departments true intent with this memo.

    So then Mr Holder, have you heard of Charlotte Figi. Let me tell you about her… Now Mr Holder – do you still wish to deny Charlotte Figi her medicine?

    Does not the language in your memo clearly state you will seek to incarcerate Charlotte Figi’s parents? Her Doctors? Her caregivers? Her distributors? Her growers?

    You do understand that denying Charlotte Figi’s medicine will likely result in her early death. You have no problem with that?

    And, not being a doctor, what do you see has been the best course of medical treatment for Charlotte Figi?

    Do you still wish to hold to your departments primary prohibition in memorandum – Preventing the distribution of marijuana to minors?

  2. Enter your name...

    The gun law should have nothing to do with mmj. If your allowed own one .. you should still be able to grow..gun laws limit our rights and need to stop criminals …

  3. FievelJ

    Not yet posted on

    Denny Strausser says:
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    August 30, 2013 at 9:30 am

    This is a very good step, in the right direction. However, the Federal government should do a full reclassification just to be fair. Otherwise, this is nothing more then a smokescreen, just to arrest people later on a federal level. They probably are just putting people off, just so as to bust large legal selling operations in the two states, that legalized later. Until something is fully signed into law, I am not going to believe too much of what our US Government has to say here.

    It is still a move in the right direction, I just hope that they follow through.
    - See more at:

    As a country, we can not move forward, if we keep debating the Marijuana laws in a negative light. We need to deal with this in a positive manner, as people are moving toward wanting it legal. It needs dealt with on an appropriate and conservative manner, that will fit our society. Constitutionally correct. The laws are not constitutional in my opinion.
    We keep moving backward, we will never move forward.
    Dennis E Strausser, Jr.


Leave a Comment


  • (will not be published)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Footer Banner Ad

More in Marijuana Laws, marijuana legalization, Marijuana News, marijuana politics (206 of 515 articles)