Go Back   Marijuana.com > Recreation > Philosophy
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2004, 01:09 AM   #1
Ovathinker
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 310
Grams: 945.20
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ovathinker has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default Are we humans or gods?

Cloning, gene splicing and therapy, desginer babies, stem-cell research.

With the recent advances in the field of human genetics, Im starting to think were getting too big for our own shoes.

For millions of years we have had evolution and natural selection to thank for getting us where we are today, the dominant species of earth.
As humans we have become so intelligent we now know what makes us 'us', and how to make it, manipulate it, control it and better it.

But should we?

Just because we have the technology dosent mean we have to start playing God.
Us humans have made too many mistakes as it is, to start thinking we can play around with our own evolution and future properly.
As for growing body parts, medical benefits, and designer babies parts of the technology, I feel that maybe we are trying to create a perfect race without even knowing it.

If this technology is let loose, in one thousand years we may be more synthetic than human.

Opinions?
__________________
And the camera makes you seasick
Ovathinker is offline Award Ovathinker Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 02-17-2004, 01:23 AM   #2
Roy
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 194
Grams: 652.85
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Roy has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

The technology has already been "let loose". The cat is out of the bag.
Anyway who doesn't like a White Widow clone? (Had to inject pot into the topic)
Roy is offline Award Roy Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2004, 06:16 AM   #3
poTCat
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 170
Grams: 941.55
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
poTCat has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
But should we?
We already are. As Roy said, the cat's out of the bag. We already are "playing" God. If we choose to do something, we make the choice to do it. If we don't choose to do something, we make the choice to not do it. If we choose to create a baby, we give it the chance to live. If we choose not to create a baby, despite having the ability, we reject its chance to live. "Playing God" is just as much about doing stuff we are capable of, as much as it is not doing stuff we are capable of. Unless you don't believe in free will, the choice is ours to do it, and therefor is completely in our hands to do with what we will. To do it, or not to do it.. we have the power, and constantly decide, to dictate what happens.
poTCat is offline Award poTCat Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2004, 10:48 PM   #4
strange_blaze
Jr. Member
 
strange_blaze's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 336
Grams: 2,151.09
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
strange_blaze has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

I think that as soon as that sheep was cloned, we were doomed to only push further and further. We cant stop technology.

I agree with your post Ovathinker, humans have gone too far.
__________________
Swayin to the rhythm of the new world order
Count bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums
strange_blaze is offline Award strange_blaze Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2004, 11:43 PM   #5
Hiz Highness
The Man
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,850
Grams: 45.65
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hiz Highness has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

I'm all for it. Let's genitically engineer ourselves into regenerating, immortal, super-geniuses.

We're definitely humans. Gods are weak, petty, and imaginary

. . . except godzilla . . . that jokers real. I've seen him.



-HH
Hiz Highness is offline Award Hiz Highness Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 02-18-2004, 02:54 AM   #6
beats
Drop-In Member
 
beats's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,355
Grams: 2,103.10
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
beats has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

I guess it is all about how far it's taken. Vaccines, and any sort of medicines could be considered playing god, because we are increasing the amount of people living, than nature would allow without their presence.

I'd have to say we are still humans. Maybe if our society lasted another 10,000 years, we could achieve many of the attributes people believe "gods" have, but frankly, I can't see our way of life lasting another 500. We've used the rescources too quickly, and people are becoming more lazy, and self-destructive. If we lose electricity, running water, and just services in general (Supermarkets) nation-wide for a year or so, I bet at least 25% of the population will die, due to a lack of the skills required to survive in the stripped continent we live on.

Cloning is a step too far I think, unless they can guarantee 100% that the result won't live for 10 years, at a speedy growth rate, or grow up with open sores, or some other previously unknown defect. Even if they perfect animal cloning (which is kinda cruel on its own turf) they have no guarantee some poor baby won't have to learn how to walk with no skin on his body.

But I suppose it's part of human nature, if it can be done, it will be done, regardless of if it should be done.
__________________

search

beats is offline Award beats Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 03:14 AM   #7
poTCat
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 170
Grams: 941.55
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
poTCat has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Here's an interesting little piece that someone I know wrote. It was in reference to a story about some scientist who wanted to pantent chimeras so no one could make them:

Quote:
First off... it wouldn't really be playing, would it? Maybe we are Gods.

If we have the ability and the technology to actually create a new species of sentient being... a human/animal hybrid... wouldn't it be "playing God" equally as much to decide NOT to do it? The world could be populated with a plethora of intelligent, self aware and (probably) sentient creatures, of all different shapes and sizes. Imagine the conversations we could have. Imagine the knowledge we could gain! But one species... us... have decided not to kill these creatures -- not to oppress them or deny them rights -- but to not allow them ever to have existed in the first place. And this is not playing God?

We have the pieces. All we have to do is put them together and new spieces are born. How do we know God didn't give us these pieces to put together? Hmm? How? What's that? Because God would have created them himself if he'd wanted them created? But he didn't create tables. Or refridgerators. Or false teeth. But he did give us the pieces and the intelligence to put them together. So why is it any different with forms of life?

Now, I don't really believe in God of course. But I'm trying to find some sense in this. I don't understand how people can justify their "playing God" excuse when they want to and not when they don't and still think they're being honest with themselves. Not creating a human/animal hybrid is just as much playing God as creating one. And honestly, it pisses me off that the whole world is denied something just because it mimics the powers of somebody's God somewhere.
poTCat is offline Award poTCat Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 01:56 PM   #8
TomBombadil
New Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 34
Grams: 427.40
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
TomBombadil has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

From what prespective would we be playing or be gods though? Surely, I don't think it's possible to reach a point where one human will look on another as a god. But for the rest of the world to regard humans as gods? That's a possibilty. Also, to me, when you say something is a "god" (just me here) the first and foremost thing I think of is powers of manipulation, followed by powers of creation. And humans have always had the abilitly to manipulate the world around them (i.e. ever since the earliest domestication of plants); it's what sets them apart from the rest of the world. So I think the rest of Earth may regard humans as somewhat god-like. But the powers of 'creation' part of being a god..Technically, they(scientists in cloning) aren't really creating anything new. Just splicing here and fusing there. It's like..they had some dough and some salt, right? And then they took off a lump of the dough, sprinkled some salt on it and made a pretzel. So anything they make will just be twisted components of life all mix-matched together. It's still life. Maybe if they created a whole new form of some weird@$$ 'dark-energy bizzaro-life' in a completely different dimesion..maybe then you would be a god. And something tells me THAT won't be happening anytime soon, if at all. To end this rambling gibbish, I think we'd have to do a sh*tload more than just clone this current form of life alone to become fullblown gods.
TomBombadil is offline Award TomBombadil Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 02:18 PM   #9
poTCat
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 170
Grams: 941.55
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
poTCat has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

But as you said.. who's gods? My gods? or yours? or theirs? What is a god? How do you define a god?

Dictionary.com has these:
Quote:
1. a) A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions.
I think we can safely rule that one as a no.

Quote:
b) The force, effect, or a manifestation or aspect of this being.
This one's debateable. We can create forces and effects that people associate with being God.

Quote:
2. A being of supernatural powers or attributes, believed in and worshiped by a people, especially a male deity thought to control some part of nature or reality.
Except for the supernatural thing (depending on how you view natural, anyway), I think humans have this pretty much covered.

Quote:
3. An image of a supernatural being; an idol.
Again, the supernatural thing. But the if someone from 100 years ago saw us today, I think he'd say we fit the bill here nicely too.

Quote:
4. One that is worshiped, idealized, or followed
There's been plenty of those..

Quote:
5. A very handsome man.
Can't quite attest for myself, but yeah. There's some of them floating around here.

Quote:
6. A powerful ruler or despot.
Don't think anyone can disagree here that men like this have, and do, exist.

As for me personally, and my belief of what a god is.. yes, I think we've attained it, but rather crudely and not to the fullest or best of our abilities.
poTCat is offline Award poTCat Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 02:32 PM   #10
Lit_Match
Moderator
 
Lit_Match's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,461
Grams: 18,131.53
Groans: 1
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Lit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation GodLit_Match IS a Reputation God
Thanks: 137
Thanked 589 Times in 352 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Arrow Inevitable

If you look at the technological tree of human history you will see ages. The stone age, the bronz age, periods of mastery of the elements to include farming and domestication of wild life. No matter where you find human history you will see that we always will make things more convienient for us. However it is a long list which takes place over 50,000 years. In the last .2% of our existance on this planet we learned to fly, and 100 years later have achieved an immeasurable amount of increase in every aspect of our lives. The wright brothers started, and now we have unmanned vehicles on the face of mars, sattelites and hubble probing the known universe, this leap took place in 100 years and more was done than has been found out in the entire known history (believed to be 50,000 years (approximate). You should shudder to think what the next 20 years will bring. It is also an overly accepted theory that at the current rate which our cpu processing speed (which 3 years ago was 18 months) is doubling (currently every 10 months) that in a decade it will be so feasable that anything we as humans can concieve will be done. I truely cannot stress enough how fast we are becoming masters of the universe and we have thus far overcome every obsticle that stands in our objectives way (accept for funding, that is). How many of you remember Atari, I sure do. Well that was little more than a decade ago, my computer has the memory and processing speed to run tens of thousands of atari games simultaneously. Wait till you see fiber optic networking replace your average silicone semiconductory mainboard, HAH! That will literally be information processed at the speed of light. Basically my point is this cloning is really small potatos and there will come a time when time itself is the only thing slowing us down.
Lit_Match is online now Award Lit_Match Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
life on mars SonicDaChronic Philosophy 12 03-07-2005 09:52 AM
20 Sack, 1.8g, Cookies Help! TheAceXer Culinary 4 04-05-2002 03:00 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53