Hi5inferno

well, talking about black holes and the earth being destroyed, it would really depend where the black hole came from.
If a microscopic black hole was created in something similar to the RHIC neoarcadian described, the blackhole would be attracted to the gravity of the earth and eventually sink down to the core and EAT US ALIVE FROM THE INSIDE!

but if there were a blackhole flying around space and our solar system happened to be near it, the sun and it would probably start orbiting each other. The black hole has to be at least a few times more massive than our sun, since you need a sun of a certain mass to collapse into a blackhole. so the blackhole would orbit our sun eventually f*ckin up all the planets orbits and ripping them apart if they got too close.
so either earth would be ripped apart by the blackhole, thrown into the sun, or thrown out of the solar system.

teufelfisch

If there was a black hole close to the Earth, I think it would pull us away from the Sun, and we would freeze.

__________________
Posting Guidelines~Search~The Medical Garden~Drug Testing Info

Yankee

About NeoArcadian’s posts:
{

About NeoArcadian’s first post:
{
For the 1st: if we were caught in a black hole we would be torn to pieces once we would be too close because there would be a significant gravity difference between the location of your head and the location of your feet. The difference in the amount of gravity between those two points is enough to tear matter apart.

For the 2nd: if time slows to a stop then the infinite gravity from our bodies would never collapse and implode us because the next frame of life in time never comes. Another way to look at it is that I think that a person from his own frame of reference could never travel at that speed (the speed of light).

For the 3rd: Perfect theory, but since the speed of time is relative to what’s around you and everything around you moves with you, we seem to experience life in this time or "real time". So it is senseless to say how slow in time are we going. What we must say is how slow in time are we going relative to what?
}

About NeoArcadian’s second post:
{
Towards the end: the only problem with antimatter is that it cannot coexist with matter. If all matter would instantaneously turn into antimatter thought, then our universe would obey the laws of antimatter. I don’t think we know enough about antimatter… like does it have gravity that pushes? If that is the case we would not be able to exist in a predominately antimatter world, but for other reasons I doubt that is not the case. I wonder if we would even notice if we suddenly did change to a predominately antimatter universe.
}

About NeoArcadian’s last post:
{
For the first part: If we could actually know the position of every bit of matter and energy in the universe today we would not be able to tell the future with our current processing power. It would take huge quantities of processing power that we by no means have today. Also, read up on the part of quantum mechanics that says it is impossible to know the position of every bit of matter and energy in the universe. If we could, does that means we have a stable destiny that cannot be changed? If we can’t, does that means we have a random destiny that could be changed? I wonder…
}


}

I g2g I can’t keep reading this thread for now; I will try to finish another day. You guys get mad off topic though. Also, I’m not sure how much I can trust my inferences when I’m high. This is the first post I write when being high so if I am wrong I am sorry. This is just some of what came to my head as I read this thread.

NeoArcadian

Of course we could never know the location of every bit of matter and energy.

It is just that if we could and if we could proccess it all we could, theoretically, know the future in it's entirety.

__________________
"Hammered like a blacksmith, Stoned like a mountain." ME.