Marijuana.com

dedbr

Opinion
The only way to alter China's hand in Darfur
By Mark Lange Wed Apr 30, 4:00 AM ET


San Francisco -
http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=tlMEu0WTc...3dRMP%2fB%3d-1http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=tlMEu0WTc...dSIPR%2fB%3d-1http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=tlMEu0WTc...%2fB%3d4919452
"Genocide Olympics" branding is a waste of time that is being paid for with lives. The media loves a good street circus – this month, Jonathan Alter declared the Olympics "the world's last lever" to settle Darfur, as if TV stunts and Olympic ceremonies propel geopolitics.
But Beijing's support for Sudan's Khartoum government won't be blunted by Western pressure. The West must constructively enlist China.
Khartoum's thugs spur ethnic hatred to incite the janjaweed militias toward something that looks like genocide. But it's important to understand that what motivates and funds this murderous regime and its weaponry isn't ethnic. It's China's desperate need for energy and the long-term strategic importance of Darfur's oil fields to China's economic growth.
Consider that China owns the largest oil concessions in Darfur. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is financing the slaughter of tribes with claims to the land above Sudan's largest reserves. He eliminates an inconvenient people with weapons and oil money from China, so he can ship more oil to China. On-camera, suppressing a smile, Energy Minister Awad al-Jaz said, "With the Chinese we don't feel any interference in our Sudanese traditions or politics or beliefs.... There is no other business but the business."
That cold context – and the fact that China has invested billions in exploration, production, pipelines, and weapons plants – underscores the implausibility of every option being endorsed by the Western punditariat.
Since China wields veto power on the United Nations Security Council, no serious multilateral sanctions, arms embargo, or effective military intervention can happen. A NATO or US-backed no-fly zone would inevitably mean occupation, since securing refugee corridors from the janjaweed can't be done from the air. It would also polarize the region, further align the US against both Muslim and Chinese interests in Africa, and escalate tensions without addressing China's fundamental motivations.
Darfur has become a five-year slaughter because of the failure of the West to devise serious incentives for China to bring Khartoum and the rebels to the table. Direct approaches to Khartoum to find a political solution have been a travesty and cannot succeed. The only way to get the Khartoum government under control and resolve this humanitarian crisis is to enlist China's economic and strategic self-interest – directly.
The West must create a context in which China's self-interest could be better served by reinforcing the rule of law in Darfur. Right now, China handles security on the ground in its own way: Thousands of the oil workers in the fields are Chinese military capable of defending installations there, should rebels gain momentum or the Bashir regime be overthrown.
To stop this surrogate standoff, the West must vest Beijing explicitly in a legitimate form of stability and security in the Sudan – one that doesn't threaten its oil interests.
Rather than attempts at embarrassment, sanctions, threats, or a serious military intervention that China would interpret as a challenge to its control of the oil fields, the focus should be on tying diplomatic and economic efforts together coherently, to enlist China constructively.
This can be done – because it has been done, in dealing with North Korea's nuclear ambitions. In 2006 the US pushed to get expanded voting rights for China in the International Monetary Fund, to reflect its weight in the world economy. The quid pro quo Treasury Secretary Paulson promoted was a "hope," as he gently put it, that more power in the IMF would motivate China to allow its artificially low currency to float to a market exchange rate (helping US and EU exports).
China's currency started to float. What wasn't mentioned publicly was that the offer of more IMF voting shares was also used to help get Beijing's aid in squeezing North Korea, by reducing its financial assistance to Pyongyang. And it worked.
If the Bush administration is looking for a legacy making move, the famously siloed departments of State, Treasury, and the US Trade Representative (USTR) could quietly offer meaningful incentives for China to play a more active role in resolving the Darfur crisis.
China has a significant interest in even modest changes to US and EU farm subsidies, for example, to make its food exports more attractive. Those subsidies are widely considered excessive. USTR has already urged "ambitious cuts" in subsidies to revive trade talks – cuts that could be applied as part of an economic brake lever on mass slaughter.
We have similar openings in trade and currency negotiations, peaceful technology transfer, scientific collaboration, environmental control technology, bioscience, and technical assistance on any number of fronts – some or all of which, negotiated deliberately, can align China's economic interests with the West's agenda in Darfur.
Attempts to gain cooperation through humiliation feel righteous, but won't deliver results. Only when we positively address China's economic self-interest, and its desperate need for energy, will the West find the humanitarian solution it seeks.
• Mark Lange is a journalist and a former presidential speechwriter.

China has been behind the Darfur situation from the beginning.......And we're supposed to trust these people?


Some Where In Ded Land................

__________________
"Underneath this mask is more than flesh, underneath this mask is an idea, Mr Creeley, and idea's are bulletproof!" V For Vendetta

I passed my drug test.....with a sixty five.....
New to our home? A lot of questions can be answered with our Posting Guidelines ........ http://www.marijuana.com/introductio...uidelines.html
What's a gram? Read our Gram Guidelines and find out...........http://www.marijuana.com/add-article/77170-marijuana-grams-system.html

 

sterbo

That's exactly right. The 'West' has to regroup and 'constructively' enlist China.
But therein lies the rub. We're hardly going to do that with our present mind set.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
The West's quest for oil, our strategic consideration (wrongly) that subjugating the African continent by proxy is in our best interests, results in the usual political spin that we're doing the best that we can do but are constantly being thwarted by others - in this particular case, China.
Spin it, soap it up, dress it any way you want to. Our only salvation lies in throwing out the old guard and hoping beyond hope that the young blood will finally see the writing on the wall and really make the quantum shift required to find a way to allow all to share in our earth's bounties.

He must have learned his spin craft well, from the feet of the Master, the US of A - Substitute these words at the end of the same sentence -
'There is no other business but freedom from terrorists'
Ain't that god's simple truth.

We've been hammering China for decades to convert to the Western Way. Now that they've done it we better take a good look in the mirror. One guick glance and then we best break it and start anew.

It'll never happen. Look at us. We'll do anything (and I do mean anything) to have access to oil interests worldwide. Hell, we taught them how to do it for crying out loud.
The only road to change is if we shift gears ourselves and start proving the truth - That only by sharing the wealth and empowering those we have only paid lip service to thru the centuries that then and only then will these continued barbarous acts (taking place with the West's wink and nod) stop taking place.

Amen

We'd do well to knock on wood with that statement.
It hasn't yet "worked". The game is still well under way.
It's just not going to happen. They want what we want. They perceive themselves in a stronger position and the sad part is that they're probably right.
We've had our shot and we fucking blew it. We're fading the way so many others have gone before.
I figure we've got one last shot to put this ship on course or the new mirror we find ourselves sobering up before will show the West bent and unforgiven as our protege in the East completes the Global destruction we so willingly handed off to them.

No, a thousand times no.
Only when we positively address the World's economic self-interest will the world find the humanitarian solution it so desperately needs.
We don't trust them, they don't trust us - round and round and round we go, and where we stop?
Oblivion,
unless we get off the goddamn merry go round...

.

__________________

dedbr

sterbo

I think you misunderstood me. I'm not speaking to something so superficial, inept and ultimately impossible as State control. We as a people must cast ourselves beyond our self imposed comfort zone. Wholesale human endeavor is our only option left.The clothes are worn out and the sweat stinks to high heaven. Look beyond.
We are, as you said, an exponentially increasing population standing on the head of a pin, this "blue ball". It's no longer feasible to segregate us, or them. Our "self reliance" will succeed or fail not as a Nation but as a Community of one planet earth.
No society to date has ever done anything but pretend to protect the masses. If, or when we actually do "protect the masses, then the only degeneration will be that of the immense and unconscionable suffering we leave behind...