| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Hot Products! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
| Grams Awarded to troublemaker_42 for this Post | |||
| Date | User | Comment | Amount |
| 04-07-2009 | THC Fiend | Didn't need none to tell me that neither! | 42.00 |
| 04-04-2009 | LowRider | sorry but i hit my max on pts. Knew it was false all along didn't need none to tell me that | 145.43 |
| | #1 | |
| 0tolerance4BS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,985
Grams: 50,544.50 Thanks: 2,952
Thanked 4,184 Times in 2,026 Posts
| AS some of you may know, I've had my doubts about the "90-95% of all guns in Mexico are traced back to the US" quote that has been ejaculated from the mouth of everyone from Hilary Clinton to Atty General William Holder, the BATFE, and every imaginable news source.( http://www.marijuana.com/politics/11...ml#post1056074 ) Here's the kicker...I was RIGHT. Its an entirely false statement, despite being repeated by those in the uppermost levels of our government. I wonder if the egg on the face is what caused Holder to say today in a news report that "no new changes in US gun laws" are palnned, when only days ago he was championing a ban on assault weapons? Remember kids, don't believe something just because someone seemingly important says it!!!! Our governemnt has lied to us before, and they certainly will again. Be it out of malice or ignorance, many politicans are content to parrot what they have been told, rather than actually verify that the info is correct. In this case, it was ignorance and an anti-gun agenda, IMO (Holder, Clinton, Fienstein, etc are all gun control advocates). Too bad they were all proven to be LIARS The Myth of 90 Percent: Only a Small Fraction of Guns in Mexico Come From U.S. - Presidential Politics | Political News - FOXNews.com Quote:
__________________ Ted Nugent: "To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." If total government control equals safety, why are prisons so dangerous? Last edited by troublemaker_42 : 04-03-2009 at 09:56 AM. | |
| | |
| The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to troublemaker_42 For This Useful Post: | Arman (04-03-2009), BigGun1 (04-11-2009), Broliette (04-04-2009), dedbr (04-06-2009), Hashishi (04-04-2009), KillerWeed420 (04-03-2009), LowRider (04-04-2009), SacredJellybean (04-16-2009), Smilez (04-07-2009), vvicked0471 (04-06-2009) |
| Grams Awarded to troublemaker_42 for this Post | |||
| Date | User | Comment | Amount |
| 04-07-2009 | THC Fiend | Didn't need none to tell me that neither! | 42.00 |
| 04-04-2009 | LowRider | sorry but i hit my max on pts. Knew it was false all along didn't need none to tell me that | 145.43 |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #2 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 624
Grams: 5,668.50 Thanks: 28
Thanked 128 Times in 99 Posts
| My personal opinion is they need more guns down there. The civilian population needs to arm itself from drug cartles and also corrupt police and army officials. |
| | |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KillerWeed420 For This Useful Post: | BigGun1 (04-11-2009), troublemaker_42 (04-06-2009) |
| | #3 |
| Incognito ![]() Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,868
Grams: 15,443.04 Thanks: 1,520
Thanked 2,206 Times in 698 Posts
| The government doesn't lie to people....people lie to people.
__________________ "No one is free when others are oppressed." |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| 0tolerance4BS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,985
Grams: 50,544.50 Thanks: 2,952
Thanked 4,184 Times in 2,026 Posts
| When those peoeple are appointed to government positions, and speak on behalf of their respective branches of government, is it not one and the same? This was a lie repeated by our Secretary of State, the BATFE, Senators, etc. These people ARE our government, and when the lie to us, its no different than the government itself lying. Semantics aside, these individuals were speaking as representatives of our elected government, and they maniplulated data in such a way calling it a lie is the only accurate way of describing it. Therefore, the government lied to me as far as I'm concerned, and the fact they haven't clarified the staement since its been proven to be BULLSHIT leads me to believe they are STILL lying to us. So much for a transparent government.... Only the lies and faces have changed....otherwise its business as usual in Washington. Quote:
Last edited by troublemaker_42 : 04-06-2009 at 11:04 AM. | |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #5 |
| Incognito ![]() Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,868
Grams: 15,443.04 Thanks: 1,520
Thanked 2,206 Times in 698 Posts
| "These people ARE our government, and when the lie to us, its no different than the government itself lying." No, the government is a tool....true at the moment those people are the people that are in charge of that tool but it removes nothing from the fact that they are not the government themselves. We are the government....they are merely the current people holding that particular weapon. I did not mean to belittle your outrage over this issue as it is appears to be quite justified and I do not have any particularly strong feelings about gun control one way or another. I have read both sides over the years and quite frankly have never really reached my own conclusions on the matter....or rather I have reached different conclusions on different aspects of it and can't really say "pro or con" to the whole issue. Heck, I didn't even mean to get involved in this discussion I just have a bit of a problem with the treating of the government as a separate entity capable of lies or truth. My problem is mostly in the fact that we can fight the lies told by people, or argue with the people themselves....when however we say that "our government" has lied we are merely whistling in the wind. I believe in accountability for ones actions and when we begin to rant about the government instead of the individual politicians we reduce their responsibility by shifting the blame to the government of which they merely represent. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| 0tolerance4BS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,985
Grams: 50,544.50 Thanks: 2,952
Thanked 4,184 Times in 2,026 Posts
| Quote:
Damn right it is I understand what you are saying as well, but when individuals act as the voice for their respective branches of government, and it happens across the board almost with this administration and this particular lie, its hard to blame the countless individuials spouting the lie as responsible, and not the administration as a whole. Our attorney general and secretary of state, argueably two of the highest ranking federal positions, rattled this "fact" off without ANYONE bothering to check it for truthfulness (or if they did, and discovered the truth, they realized it wasn't going to help their case in any way being so insignificant). Its hard not to blame "the government" when it appears this lie was basically for all purposes sanctioned by this administration. The time line surrounding this fact is what makes it INCREDIBLY suspect in my book Fact-Pre-Election, Obama made it no secret he wanted assault weapons banned, and stated so publically many times and in print on his website Fact- Atty General Eric Holder is a gun control advocate, who also supported Obama's ban plan, and weeks ago, stated so publicly Fact- , Mexico became a focus, and suddenly, this "fact" started making its way through the government and media. "We've GOT to ban them, for Mexico's sake, because we suupply 90% of the weapons they use to kill each other"" became the rallying cry for everyone from the "Violence Policy Center" (formerly Handgun Control Inc.) to Diannne Feinstein, to Hilary Clinton to yet again, Atty General Holder. Fact- 65 Democratic Congressmen wrote Eric Holder, stating they were deadset against supporting such a ban as they felt it was an infringement of rights (which would make a majority combined with the republicans who also disagreed with the need for such a ban) Fact- Holder suddenly revereses his decision the same day the Fox News report comes out, saying that "he doesn't foresee a need for additonal gun laws" in direct contridiction of what he said approximately 3 weeks before. THIS is why I'm outraged. This was more than a mere misunderstanding of the facts. This was a case of the governemnt trying to pull a fast one on a largely ignorant (on the issue) public. ONLY when their lies were exposed did the talk of banning assault weapons take a backseat. In this case, I guess there WAS "transparancy in government" in that the agenda was clearly seen through the lies(at least by anyone daring to take a look). There will certianly be more talk of such a ban....as soon as the administration finds other facts or scenarios to manipulate to get what they want. Last edited by troublemaker_42 : 04-07-2009 at 11:48 AM. | |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to troublemaker_42 For This Useful Post: | BigGun1 (04-11-2009) |
| | #7 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 790
Grams: 8,743.55 Thanks: 268
Thanked 229 Times in 155 Posts
| like i said before on another post, most guns come from the south of there border NOT OURS |
| | |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LowRider For This Useful Post: | BigGun1 (04-11-2009), troublemaker_42 (04-06-2009) |
| | #8 |
| New Member Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 59
Grams: 1,063.85 Thanks: 57
Thanked 18 Times in 9 Posts
| I don't understand why the media is hammering this so hard. Hasn't the US been known for selling, trading or giving arms to other nations/people? Look at the Iran thing back in the Regan administration. I'm not saying it's a good thing, but why all the surprise now? Because it's hitting a little close to home? |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #9 | |
| New Member Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5
Grams: 643.30 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Obviously, the government lies to us, but so does the media. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| 0tolerance4BS ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,985
Grams: 50,544.50 Thanks: 2,952
Thanked 4,184 Times in 2,026 Posts
| Fox came with facts, and showed where the "90%" claim came from...the government and the other media simply parroted a convenient sound byte, with zero regard to the truth. Just because FOX news reported it doesn't make it the least bit false. No other media outlet bothered to verify the false claims, making them every bit the liars the government officials who spouted it are. You can attack the source all you want, but in this case, it certainly doesn't make them any less credible. They showed where the figure came from....other media outlets simply reported it as fact, with no verification whatsoever of the data.. You can attack Fox if you want to, but they are the ONLY media outlet that bothered to expose this as the lie it is. If you think fox is somehow lying or whatever your post is trying to claim, back it up with facts. Fox news can...but can you? Yes, I made the claim that the government and media lied to us. I however backed that claim up with facts. If you feel differently, do you have any info to support your opinion? i didn't think so. Last edited by troublemaker_42 : 04-07-2009 at 06:11 AM. |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to troublemaker_42 For This Useful Post: | vvicked0471 (04-16-2009) |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |