4:20 Bombs for Ron Paul? - Page 3

Trocisp · 10-20-2007, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fat_enchilada

Look at it this way - while Ron might have one bad proposal that will cost a lot of money, the democrats and neocons will bring in MANY bad proposals, that will get passed if they don't have to worry about presidential vetoes.

That's a broad sweeping statement, it's too bad it's not backed up by logic.

Ron Paul doesn't have "a" proposal I don't agree with, he has many. He wont be getting my vote.

Honestly, call me crazy, but I like Hillary Clinton.

fat_enchilada · 10-20-2007, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trocisp

That's a broad sweeping statement, it's too bad it's not backed up by logic.

Followed up by a quip with no substance. Joy.

One word: Earmarks
Two more words: "Fairness" doctrine
Three more words: Increased FCC regulation

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trocisp

Ron Paul doesn't have "a" proposal I don't agree with, he has many. He wont be getting my vote.

I can say that too. But most either 1) won't get through congress, or 2) can be done at the state level.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trocisp

Honestly, call me crazy, but I like Hillary Clinton.

You do know that she actually agrees with Ron Paul on the fence issue, right?

Plainsman1963 · 10-20-2007, 04:11 AM

Ron Paul on immigration reform.

Quote:

Q: You voted to support that 700-mile fence along the border with Mexico. Is there a need for a similar fence along the border with Canada?

PAUL: No. The fence was my weakest reason for voting for that, but enforcing the law was important, and border security is important. And we've talked about amnesty, which I'm positively opposed to. If you subsidize something, you get more of it. We subsidize illegal immigration, we reward it by easy citizenship, either birthright or amnesty.

Trocisp · 10-20-2007, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fat_enchilada

Followed up by a quip with no substance. Joy.

One word: Earmarks
Two more words: "Fairness" doctrine
Three more words: Increased FCC regulation

Care to explain the reasoning behind those three statements? Are they in relation to Ron Pauls stances (be them positive or negative) or Hillary Clintons (be them positive or negative)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by fat_enchilada

I can say that too. But most either 1) won't get through congress, or 2) can be done at the state level.

In response to;
1)Which ones wont get through congress? And it's not only laws and propositions of his that I disagree with, but his foreign policy as well.

2)What can be done at the state level? Stunning specificity there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fat_enchilada

You do know that she actually agrees with Ron Paul on the fence issue, right?

The difference being, her fence isn't purely a physical wall. She is for a smart-fence along most of it (in other words, rather than a full 2100 mile fence, fence in key areas, with Infrared cameras and motion detectors along the rest).

TurbulentHigh · 12-14-2007, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trocisp

While I agree with a lot of stuff Ron Paul says, I can't see myself supporting any candidate who thinks it's a good idea to build a seven hundred mile fence along our twenty one hundred mile border with Mexico. That automatically eliminated all the currently-running republicans.

Ron Paul is a republican candidate, and he doesn't support building a fence. He stated he believed the idea was ridiculous. He wants to encourage legal immigration by increasing the economy by getting rid of wasteful government programs. I can think of one good one hes going to get rid of the DEA.

Viper420 · 12-15-2007, 05:43 AM

Remember this and it applies to all politicians....they'll say anything to get elected.

TurbulentHigh · 12-15-2007, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viper420

Remember this and it applies to all politicians....they'll say anything to get elected.

Ron Paul practices what he preaches. His 10 year voting record proves it.

Can you show me an example of that with Ron Paul?

Viper420 · 12-16-2007, 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurbulentHigh

Ron Paul practices what he preaches. His 10 year voting record proves it.

Can you show me an example of that with Ron Paul?

Politicians preach one thing and do something else after they are elected and then blame others if their promises don't come true. Then they repeat the same promises that got them elected the first time because people don't remember the lies from the previous campaign. Its standard practice among ALL politicians. They all have an angels smile and the devils tongue.

grow_master · 12-16-2007, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurbulentHigh

Ron Paul practices what he preaches. His 10 year voting record proves it.

Can you show me an example of that with Ron Paul?

those of us in the know, are in no obligation to find links and educate you idiots not in the know.

if you cant figure that out yourself, you are cluless.

ever hear of google, like duh.

go find out....it only takes a second

geeeeze, what has happened to the men in this country ??

Plainsman1963 · 12-15-2007, 06:32 AM

And Ron Paul has been leading up to this moment by saying exactly what he believes is constitutionally legal in regards to federal government consistently for decades. It's all a ruse!!!

Ron Paul has an ad running in High Times and will be on the cover of the January issue of Cannabis Culture, btw.

Cannabis Culture Ron Paul page

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

New To Site?	Need Help?
Advertising Register to Participate View Forum Leaders Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read

Hot Products:

Orange Krush - Legal Bud

Black Magic Solid Smokes

Vapir One Vaporizer

12-15-2007, 05:43 AM	#6
Viper420 Banned Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 843 Grams: 7,415.65 Thanks: 44 Thanked 131 Times in 115 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	Remember this and it applies to all politicians....they'll say anything to get elected.