1. Home
  2. News
  3. Forum
  4. Photos
  5. Store
  6. Recipes
  7. Cultivation
  8. Smoke Shop
  9. Drug Test
  10. Advertise

Hot Products:

  • Legal Buds · 
  • Herb Grinders · 
  • Vaporizers · 
  • Rolling Papers · 
  • Drug Test · 
  • Synthetic Urine · 
  • Marijuana Dating · 
  • Pot.Com · 
  • More Products



Go Back   Marijuana.com > Knowledge > Science
Reload this Page Fusion to be created by 192 giant laser beams
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Hot Products!

Orange Krush - Legal Bud

The latest and greatest legal bud available! Orange Krush is a sweet smelling exotic herbal smoking bud that burns smooth and tastes great. Try this new legal bud now! More

Black Magic Solid Smokes

NOT LABELED AS HERBAL HASH by FDA LAW. An all natural and legal herbal solid. one-of-a-kind! More

Vapir One Vaporizer

Vapir One is a top selling herbal vaporizer manufactured by Air2, an established vaporizer producer known for quality and reliability.More

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes


Old 04-01-2009, 12:51 AM   #1
RandomOne
Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 276
Grams: 5,695.70
RandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with Karma
Thanks: 9
Thanked 111 Times in 57 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default Fusion to be created by 192 giant laser beams

BBC NEWS | Science & Environment | Giant laser experiment powers up

This is the stuff of science fiction.

If it works... we could have an energy source capable of powering a starship
RandomOne is offline Award RandomOne Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RandomOne For This Useful Post:
nornerator (04-01-2009), Vicki (04-01-2009)
Remove Advertisements
Marijuana.com Sponsor
RandomOne
View Public Profile
Send a private message to RandomOne
Find More Posts by RandomOne

Old 04-01-2009, 03:55 AM   #2
nornerator
Sr. Member
 
nornerator's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,801
Grams: 11,911.35
nornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Gods
Thanks: 933
Thanked 745 Times in 304 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

While I agree that this is a huge step forward in science, technology, and energy creation, it begs a question. We already have a huge fusion reactor which operates safely without any maintenance or personnel, but for some reason we cannot harvest this energy properly. The Sun! It provides more than enough power in sheer wattage to power everything in our civilization and much more. Why don't we harvest the suns energy? That way we don't have to risk any runaway fusion accidents
nornerator is offline Award nornerator Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nornerator For This Useful Post:
Yana Usdi (04-01-2009)
nornerator
View Public Profile
Send a private message to nornerator
Find More Posts by nornerator

Old 04-01-2009, 04:39 AM   #3
IGemini
[?]
 
IGemini's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,198
Grams: 9,144.35
IGemini Is a member to emulateIGemini Is a member to emulateIGemini Is a member to emulateIGemini Is a member to emulateIGemini Is a member to emulateIGemini Is a member to emulateIGemini Is a member to emulateIGemini Is a member to emulate
Thanks: 80
Thanked 204 Times in 135 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nornerator View Post
While I agree that this is a huge step forward in science, technology, and energy creation, it begs a question. We already have a huge fusion reactor which operates safely without any maintenance or personnel, but for some reason we cannot harvest this energy properly. The Sun! It provides more than enough power in sheer wattage to power everything in our civilization and much more. Why don't we harvest the suns energy? That way we don't have to risk any runaway fusion accidents
Quite a few reasons.


Solar cells are really expensive to produce. Cost-effectiveness isn't seen for 5-10 years after necessary construction of any solar setup (in ideal circumstances), if not more. Plus, solar power is only really viable in areas with access to a lot of direct sunlight and a minimum of cloud cover. Ideally, these areas are in the southern parts of the US, mostly in desert regions. There are only three stations currently active in the US, the rest will only be in states like California, Arizona, and Nevada. Power distribution is only so effective to a degree. Stratospherical solar collection would almost be more efficient, since almost half of all solar radiation is reflected into space before it hits terra firma.

I'm not sure how likely "runaway fusion accidents" would be...it's not like fission that's much harder to control. It only takes one stray neutron to cause a runaway reaction in a uranium reactor. But with fusion, you can only use as much product as is put into the reactor. Deuterium itself is a naturally-occuring particle (1 part per 6,500), but tritium for the purposes of fusion as a terrestrial power source is only formed by artificial means, and decays quite rapidly.
IGemini is offline Award IGemini Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IGemini For This Useful Post:
Yana Usdi (04-01-2009)
IGemini
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IGemini
Find More Posts by IGemini

Old 04-01-2009, 12:53 PM   #4
nornerator
Sr. Member
 
nornerator's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,801
Grams: 11,911.35
nornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Godsnornerator Walks among the Reputation Gods
Thanks: 933
Thanked 745 Times in 304 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IGemini View Post
Quite a few reasons.


Solar cells are really expensive to produce. Cost-effectiveness isn't seen for 5-10 years after necessary construction of any solar setup (in ideal circumstances), if not more. Plus, solar power is only really viable in areas with access to a lot of direct sunlight and a minimum of cloud cover. Ideally, these areas are in the southern parts of the US, mostly in desert regions. There are only three stations currently active in the US, the rest will only be in states like California, Arizona, and Nevada. Power distribution is only so effective to a degree. Stratospherical solar collection would almost be more efficient, since almost half of all solar radiation is reflected into space before it hits terra firma.

I'm not sure how likely "runaway fusion accidents" would be...it's not like fission that's much harder to control. It only takes one stray neutron to cause a runaway reaction in a uranium reactor. But with fusion, you can only use as much product as is put into the reactor. Deuterium itself is a naturally-occuring particle (1 part per 6,500), but tritium for the purposes of fusion as a terrestrial power source is only formed by artificial means, and decays quite rapidly.
While this answers the question of why current solar power technologies are not heavily invested in, clearly there is a disconnect between how much energy is coming from the sun and how much energy we need to power our civilization.

The amount of sheer power from the sun that hits the earth is ~1,353Watts per square meter.

The amount of energy needed to power the earth is 1.6 x 10^13 W

The total amount of power received by the sun on the earths surface is 8.9x10^15 W, nearly 600 times as much power as is required by all human civilization.

Its not that the power source is inadequate, simply our technology.

Not to mention the possibility of building a huge solar array in space around part of the sun as part of a Dyson sphere. The energy could be beamed back to earth.

I am all for fusion power, don't get me wrong. It just seems like such a waste that we already have such a large fusion reactor sending out massive amounts of power that simply is not being tapped.

World energy resources and consumption - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
nornerator is offline Award nornerator Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Remove Advertisements
Marijuana.com Sponsor
nornerator
View Public Profile
Send a private message to nornerator
Find More Posts by nornerator

Old 04-01-2009, 07:42 PM   #5
RandomOne
Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 276
Grams: 5,695.70
RandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with Karma
Thanks: 9
Thanked 111 Times in 57 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nornerator View Post
While this answers the question of why current solar power technologies are not heavily invested in, clearly there is a disconnect between how much energy is coming from the sun and how much energy we need to power our civilization.

The amount of sheer power from the sun that hits the earth is ~1,353Watts per square meter.

The amount of energy needed to power the earth is 1.6 x 10^13 W

The total amount of power received by the sun on the earths surface is 8.9x10^15 W, nearly 600 times as much power as is required by all human civilization.

Its not that the power source is inadequate, simply our technology.

Not to mention the possibility of building a huge solar array in space around part of the sun as part of a Dyson sphere. The energy could be beamed back to earth.

I am all for fusion power, don't get me wrong. It just seems like such a waste that we already have such a large fusion reactor sending out massive amounts of power that simply is not being tapped.

World energy resources and consumption - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I agree we should be harnessing more power from the sun. That's one of the steps towards becoming a Class II civilization right?

We still need to be researching Portable fusion though. Fusion we can put on a spaceship and take with us. Fusion we can put on a base on one of jupiter's moons.
RandomOne is offline Award RandomOne Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RandomOne For This Useful Post:
nornerator (04-01-2009)
RandomOne
View Public Profile
Send a private message to RandomOne
Find More Posts by RandomOne

Old 04-01-2009, 05:01 AM   #6
Yana Usdi
Dogs best friend
 
Yana Usdi's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,001
Grams: 14,642.15
Yana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation GodYana Usdi IS a Reputation God
Thanks: 1,111
Thanked 979 Times in 458 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Another aspect to consider with the future of fusion is helium 3. It's pretty rare on earth but it's plentiful on the moon and it's one of the few things that might be worth mining to bring back down. Gold wouldn't be worth the transport costs but that might be.

An article on the subject from Wired was interesting.

Race to the Moon for Nuclear Fuel

Last edited by Yana Usdi : 04-01-2009 at 05:19 AM. Reason: One article is plenty
Yana Usdi is offline Award Yana Usdi Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Yana Usdi For This Useful Post:
Hashishi (04-01-2009), Vicki (04-01-2009)
Yana Usdi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Yana Usdi
Find More Posts by Yana Usdi

Old 04-01-2009, 05:11 AM   #7
ctwalrus
c21-h30-o2
 
ctwalrus's Avatar
 
Tournaments Won: 1

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,588
Grams: 8,420.72
ctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Godsctwalrus Walks among the Reputation Gods
Thanks: 575
Thanked 600 Times in 374 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

"To work, it must show that more energy can be extracted from the process than is required to initiate it."

omg
can anyone say holy grail
__________________
☮ ♥
ctwalrus is offline Award ctwalrus Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
ctwalrus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ctwalrus
Find More Posts by ctwalrus

Old 04-01-2009, 07:45 AM   #8
RandomOne
Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 276
Grams: 5,695.70
RandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with KarmaRandomOne smokes a bowl with Karma
Thanks: 9
Thanked 111 Times in 57 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctwalrus View Post
"To work, it must show that more energy can be extracted from the process than is required to initiate it."

omg
can anyone say holy grail
It sounds like it would break the laws of thermodynamics. But think about a nuclear explosion, much more energy comes out of it than is put in (or more like we are tapping the real energy potential of the atoms in the reaction).

I think it is possible, but the main issue will be mass. I don't think their pellet of hydrogen ions will be enough to create a sustainable fusion source. the sun works because it is so massive that it's fusion can be caused by gravity. But given an infinite supply of hydrogen that they can keep feeding into the thing, and given that they get enough power out of it to keep running the laser beams plus a little extra, it would be an infinite energy source, no?

Here's hoping anyway.
RandomOne is offline Award RandomOne Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Remove Advertisements
Marijuana.com Sponsor
RandomOne
View Public Profile
Send a private message to RandomOne
Find More Posts by RandomOne

Reply

« UFOs: Yayliens or Nayliens | God, Darwin, and Design - Ken Miller »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fusion of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity nornerator Philosophy 8 05-03-2007 11:12 AM
Nintendo Fusion tour dates SacredJellybean Games and Sports 1 08-01-2006 03:06 AM
Does marijuana stop fusion healing?? rosebudd1 Medicinal Marijuana 5 09-18-2005 07:00 PM
Fusion Frenzy for Xbox techno_trancer Games and Sports 2 10-26-2002 11:15 PM

New To Site? Need Help?
  • Advertising
  • Register to Participate
  • View Forum Leaders
  • Contact Us
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Did you forget your password?
  • Mark Forums Read

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Contact Us - Marijuana.com - Archive - Top

RSS Feeds · Advertise on Marijuana.com · Home · Vaporizers · Smoke Shop · Drug Testing · Marijuana Drug Tests · Legal Weed · Marijuana Personals · RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios Marijuana.com © 1995-2009
Ad Management by RedTyger


Your Ad Here
LinkBack
LinkBack URL LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks About LinkBacks
Bookmark & Share
Add Thread to del.icio.us Add Thread to del.icio.us
Bookmark in Technorati Bookmark in Technorati
Furl this Thread! Furl this Thread!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55