Marijuana.com

Dro5

What is the most efficent way, by that i mean which way delivers the most thc to the user.

 

pkster8235

"Best" is usually subjective, so I doubt you are going to get a clear cut answer on this.. everyone has a preference and what works good for me might not work good for the next guy/gal. A lot of people say vaporizers are the best.. that aside, I like pipes best. Rather than burning constantly into the air like a lit joint, with pipes you can snuff it out after each toke if you wish.. less wasted weed that way..

Other than that though I think burning weed is burning weed.. the amount of THC doesn't depend on the smoking device, but rather the quality of the bud.

__________________

Music, because of its specific and far-reaching metaphorical powers, can name the unnameable and communicate the unknowable.
-Leonard Bernstein

drOnly

apply fire to the mary and inhale the smizzoke. imo bongs get me the highest.. vapes use the least amount of weed and still get you very high.. id have to say between bongs and vapes..

steakii

Well if you are going for not losing any THC, then it is going to be a vaporizer. If you are looking to smoke, it would be a bowl or a one hitter.

Chawkens

Vape

__________________
when you do things right, people wont be sure you've done anything at all -- God (futurama)

 

Buzzby

Rather than burning up half the THC by using fire to heat up your weed, use a vaporizer. Any method that uses fire is actually a very inefficient way to vaporize the THC and other cannabinoids in the weed.

__________________

Jake

If the older members here are any indication...vape sounds amazing. From what I've gathered, you easily double, triple, or even quadruple the number of "highs" you can get from the same amount of the same quality weed.

There's been some studies on smoking, and most have come back saying that joints and bowls are the best. Joints look inefficient, when you see all of that smoke burning off, but compare that long, thin stream to the occasional giant plume you see coming from your bowl. Also, you could try putting the lit end of a joint in your mouth (be careful, needless to say) and try to see how long it would take to get a good hit off of it. It usually takes a good 15-20 seconds, you're losing less smoke than you think you are with joints. Watter pipes are least efficient way to smoke.

I think blunts are somewhere in the middle...

__________________

marijuanavillle7

The good ole bong. I get blitzed.

Outkasted

Joints and blunts get me lifted.

FunkySkunky

Yeah, this is actually NOT a very subjective question. It takes a bit of reasoning to come to this conclusion: Joints are the most inefficient smoking method as you destroy half of the THC with combustion then let most of the smoke escape into open air; bowls are a bit more efficient but again: combustion. Bongs are pretty efficient as they capture nearly all of the smoke in the chamber. The only way to get the most from your bud is vaporization because, like Buzzby said, combustion destroys a good amount of THC.

__________________
(Insert inspirational quote)