| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Hot Products! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
| | #1 |
| New Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Grams: 2,337.30 Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
| What is the most efficent way, by that i mean which way delivers the most thc to the user. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #2 |
| Lazy Dancer ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,594
Grams: 22,960.77 Thanks: 766
Thanked 722 Times in 505 Posts
| "Best" is usually subjective, so I doubt you are going to get a clear cut answer on this.. everyone has a preference and what works good for me might not work good for the next guy/gal. A lot of people say vaporizers are the best.. that aside, I like pipes best. Rather than burning constantly into the air like a lit joint, with pipes you can snuff it out after each toke if you wish.. less wasted weed that way.. Other than that though I think burning weed is burning weed.. the amount of THC doesn't depend on the smoking device, but rather the quality of the bud.
__________________ We treat mishaps like sinking ships and I know that I don't want to be out to drift.. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| its blunt o'clock ![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,688
Grams: 8,690.23 Thanks: 68
Thanked 161 Times in 104 Posts
| apply fire to the mary and inhale the smizzoke. imo bongs get me the highest.. vapes use the least amount of weed and still get you very high.. id have to say between bongs and vapes.. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,810
Grams: 91,225.87 Thanks: 997
Thanked 6,796 Times in 3,139 Posts
| Rather than burning up half the THC by using fire to heat up your weed, use a vaporizer. Any method that uses fire is actually a very inefficient way to vaporize the THC and other cannabinoids in the weed.
__________________ 60% of the people of America now say we are heading toward a depression. Not a recession, a depression. We are in desperate need of profitable industries that we can tax. Um... Now can we legalize pot? ~ Bill Maher |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #5 |
| Sr. Member ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,687
Grams: 19,542.65 Thanks: 186
Thanked 374 Times in 280 Posts
| Well if you are going for not losing any THC, then it is going to be a vaporizer. If you are looking to smoke, it would be a bowl or a one hitter. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Jr. Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 137
Grams: 3,361.35 Thanks: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
| Vape
__________________ when you do things right, people wont be sure you've done anything at all -- God (futurama) |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Sr. Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,612
Grams: 36,876.54 Thanks: 337
Thanked 991 Times in 599 Posts
| If the older members here are any indication...vape sounds amazing. From what I've gathered, you easily double, triple, or even quadruple the number of "highs" you can get from the same amount of the same quality weed. There's been some studies on smoking, and most have come back saying that joints and bowls are the best. Joints look inefficient, when you see all of that smoke burning off, but compare that long, thin stream to the occasional giant plume you see coming from your bowl. Also, you could try putting the lit end of a joint in your mouth (be careful, needless to say) and try to see how long it would take to get a good hit off of it. It usually takes a good 15-20 seconds, you're losing less smoke than you think you are with joints. Watter pipes are least efficient way to smoke. I think blunts are somewhere in the middle...
__________________ ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 291
Grams: 3,945.55 Thanks: 55
Thanked 74 Times in 48 Posts
| The good ole bong. I get blitzed. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |||
| | |||
| | #9 |
| New Member Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 53
Grams: 2,249.80 Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
| Joints and blunts get me lifted. ![]() |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 923
Grams: 12,530.25 Thanks: 313
Thanked 326 Times in 222 Posts
| Yeah, this is actually NOT a very subjective question. It takes a bit of reasoning to come to this conclusion: Joints are the most inefficient smoking method as you destroy half of the THC with combustion then let most of the smoke escape into open air; bowls are a bit more efficient but again: combustion. Bongs are pretty efficient as they capture nearly all of the smoke in the chamber. The only way to get the most from your bud is vaporization because, like Buzzby said, combustion destroys a good amount of THC.
__________________ "... Rise up against... [tyranny] with the pessimism of the intellect, but with the optimism of the will." ![]() -Webster Tarpley |
| | |