| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Which came first? | |||
| Chicken | | 8 | 32.00% |
| Egg | | 17 | 68.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #41 | |
| DEAD BEAR ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,046
Grams: 59,394.00 Groans: 12
Groaned at 25 Times in 16 Posts
Thanks: 2,569
Thanked 2,364 Times in 1,073 Posts
| Quote:
An sewer? What kind of toilet facility is that? Is that close to a monsewer, like the French say?Sorry hookah.... ....Some Where In Ded Land.........
__________________ I have just three things to teach: simplicity, patience, compassion. These are your greatest treasures...Tao Te Ching In three words I can sum up everything I know about life: it goes on. Robert FrostPosting Guidelines! | |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #42 | |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,462
Grams: 48,057.98 Groans: 37
Groaned at 49 Times in 41 Posts
Thanks: 529
Thanked 3,918 Times in 1,943 Posts
| That would assume that there have always been both chickens and eggs. Having found no chickens fossils in the Pre-Cambrian strata, there is no evidence that this would be true. No points for you! Quote:
__________________ 60% of the people of America now say we are heading toward a depression. Not a recession, a depression. We are in desperate need of profitable industries that we can tax. Um... Now can we legalize pot? ~ Bill Maher | |
| | |
| | #43 | |
| No Longer Active ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,696
Grams: 2,607.77 Groans: 1
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 39
Thanked 45 Times in 37 Posts
| Quote:
__________________ I use to like this site, but it out grew my interests. If you want to pass a test, Quit Smoking, I have! | |
| | |
| | #44 |
| DEAD BEAR ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,046
Grams: 59,394.00 Groans: 12
Groaned at 25 Times in 16 Posts
Thanks: 2,569
Thanked 2,364 Times in 1,073 Posts
| So ? Where does the abbatoir come into this discussion? Or does it? Some Where In Ded Land......... |
| | |
| | #45 | ||
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,462
Grams: 48,057.98 Groans: 37
Groaned at 49 Times in 41 Posts
Thanks: 529
Thanked 3,918 Times in 1,943 Posts
| Quote:
Quote:
![]() | ||
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #46 |
| Wonko the Sane ![]() ![]() Tournaments Won: 1 Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,431
Grams: 6,585.65 Groans: 6
Groaned at 11 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 147
Thanked 277 Times in 173 Posts
| If "egg" means egg then the egg came first... cause of them fish. If "egg" means an egg laid by a chicken then the chicken came first, cause no egg could exist without a chicken. If "egg" means an egg out of which a chicken is hatched then the egg came first. Every chicken had to hatch from an egg and every egg had to be shot out of a chicken. This gives rise to an infinite series. Humans are always fooled by the illusion of time. Even if you consider evolution... which happens over millions of years... any egg laid by a chicken would have to be a chicken and any chicken egg must have been laid by a chicken. The changes of evolution are so subtle that you still can't deny an infinite series... or something... all the way back to when that first fish crawled out of the water with his mutant fish hands... __________________________________________________ ______________________ Answer # 2.... God created the chicken. Man, religion sure makes these things easy. __________________________________________________ _____________________ Answer # 3.... If you poor half a glass into an empty glass then the glass is half full. If you poor half a glass out of a full glass then the glass is half empty. What were we talking about again? The glass is just too big! Wait what?
__________________ "Nietzsche is dead." -God brevity is... wit |
| | |
| | #47 |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,462
Grams: 48,057.98 Groans: 37
Groaned at 49 Times in 41 Posts
Thanks: 529
Thanked 3,918 Times in 1,943 Posts
| However you care to define "chicken", the creature that laid the first egg out of which a chicken hatched wasn't a chicken. Ergo, the first chicken egg preceded the first chicken. Thus spake my guru. So mote it be! |
| | |
| | #48 |
| Wonko the Sane ![]() ![]() Tournaments Won: 1 Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,431
Grams: 6,585.65 Groans: 6
Groaned at 11 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 147
Thanked 277 Times in 173 Posts
| Evolution occurs over millions of years. A chicken egg didn't drop out of a non-chicken *all of a sudden* one day. It's not like one day a human will give birth to a flying super monkey with four testicles... it'll take a million years before that kind of evolutionary perfection is achieved. The difference in evolutionary traits between the chicken hatched out of an egg and the creature that lays the egg would be so subtle that you couldn't call that creature anything BUT a chicken. Trace these subtle variations over millions of years and there will be noticeable differences... but again... look at the first part of the post. IT ALL DEPENDS ON HOW YOU DEFINE THE EGG IN QUESTION. If the definition of the egg is "an egg laid from a chicken" then the chicken would come first. If the egg is defined as one out of which hatches a chicken... then the egg came first. |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Buddhist Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,462
Grams: 48,057.98 Groans: 37
Groaned at 49 Times in 41 Posts
Thanks: 529
Thanked 3,918 Times in 1,943 Posts
| That's not true. However you care to define "chicken", the first one had parents who weren't chickens. If you change your definition of "chicken" to include those parents, then the first one of them emerged from a non-chicken. Wherever you draw the line between "chicken" and "non-chicken", the first chicken hatched out of an egg laid by a non-chicken. |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Wonko the Sane ![]() ![]() Tournaments Won: 1 Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,431
Grams: 6,585.65 Groans: 6
Groaned at 11 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 147
Thanked 277 Times in 173 Posts
| You're right that at some point a line needs to be drawn. Otherwise I'd have to conclude that fish were chickens. I'm saying that the changes are so subtle over natural selection that to pin-point exactly where the chicken started and another species ends is delving into complete obscurity. It all comes down to how the egg is defined. If I were to say the egg, in order to be a chicken egg, had to be laid by a chicken... then the chicken came first. Another way is to say the egg must HATCH a chicken for it to be considered a chicken egg. In this case the egg came first. But there's no way to pin point when this transition occurred... because evolution doesn't work by a Blue Jay laying a chicken egg one day. If the egg in question isn't defined as a chicken egg, then the egg came first... because fish were laying eggs long before there was life on land. |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Layer Cake | Bx4Lyfe_2005 | Movies & Television | 2 | 10-01-2005 10:50 PM |
| Faster Clean Time for Daily Users? | surReal | Urine Testing | 2 | 05-07-2005 08:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |