Marijuana.com

Itzamna · 12-04-2006, 07:59 PM

my experiences with vaporizors is that there is more THC and the high is more upidy, yet fades faster; therefore i'd say its equal

THC Fiend · 12-04-2006, 08:00 PM

There are two sides to this debate.

The first side says that vaping is more efficient.

The second side says that every smoking tool will give you a completely different high, and therefore, comparing a vape to any other tool is like comparing apples and oranges, or like comparing tom cruise with something that isn't a douche. It's just impossible

IIDX · 12-04-2006, 08:09 PM

The point I'm at right now is that I bong hit every night essentially...a couple good bong hits every few hours. If I put say 0.2 or 0.3 in a vape I can get ripped quite hard, but if I put that in a bong it's just a strong buzz...I find vape and bong combo the best though....that just wrecks me.

t-1000 · 12-04-2006, 08:22 PM

the simple fact is, optimal vaping will provide better results than optimal smoking

Put well ground bud into a volcano and that will be as good as it gets. Grinding more will expose as much material as possible, and a constant stream of properly heated air will suck almost all the THC out into the bag.

Condensation is negligable.

and you can always cook the leftovers for the CBNs or make hash oil or something

Purpose420 · 03-14-2007, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5drive

There is no concrete answer to 'which is more efficient?'. It depends on different factors that vary with the individual, the product, the equipment. You get pretty much the same amount of THC with either method. One way you lose a little with combustion, and the other way you lose a little because some vapor doesn't make to the mouthpiece. If one way is more efficient than the other, it's not enough to be concerned about. Do you lose CBN's with vaping? Probably not if your temp is high enough. There needs to be some scientific testing on the vaporization points of CBNs to determine that. Is there a difference between the high of vaping vs. smoking? No doubt. More of a laid back, couchlock type high with smoking. Is some of that due to not getting CBNs vaped? Possibly. Is some of that due to not getting toxins like carbon monoxide when you vape? No doubt. Is benzene (released at <400F) part of the smoking high? How about toluene, which is the solvent in airplane glue? I don't know, but I prefer to avoid them. My lungs are also much happier now that I vape instead of smoke. For most vapers, it's not so much about efficiency or a better high, it's about a much healthier way to get your THC. And if you like the high from both types of ingestion, then do both, depending on how you want to feel at the time.

I have no proof of what I say, but we count 2-3 vapor bowl's to one joint depending on the size of your bowl and the joint your rolling. My next experiment will be breaking open a blunt and count the bowls.

comet · 06-05-2007, 06:11 PM

They are both different. I think I also get high from the smoke itself from a bong rip. Usually for me big bing and then volcano to keep it all even. Then I am covering all bases.

I think I get just as ripped but it is different with each method.

With vaping I can save the duff and make food with it. With my burning I cannot.

Positive and Negs for both.

coMet

Purpose420 · 06-05-2007, 07:41 PM

First off you need to buy a quality vaporizer, I realize vaporizers are pricey but I would gladly set you up with a world class vaporizer at a very nice price I've been vaping since September and the results to me are astounding.

comet · 06-05-2007, 07:44 PM

I already have like 10 of them thanks. I have tried them all just about and if not I will. See my other posts for the lists of vapes I do own and use.. Thanks Bro for the offer!

Purpose420 · 06-05-2007, 07:50 PM

Have you any from the vaporstore?

comet · 06-05-2007, 07:52 PM

I have see my list that is where I get most of them from. It sounded like you worked for them saying World Class Vaporizers. Glad to see you are suporting them.

View Poll Results: Which requires less herb to get you to the place you want to be? (See below)
I don't have enough firsthand experience to know for sure.	11	22.92%
vaporization requires 200% or more than smoking joints	0	0%
vaporization requires about 100% more than smoking joints	0	0%
vaporization requires about 50% more than smoking joints	1	2.08%
vaporization requires about 25% more than smoking joints	0	0%
vaporization is about equal to smoking joints	7	14.58%
smoking joints requires about 25% more than vaporization	2	4.17%
smoking joints requires about 50% more than vaporization	11	22.92%
smoking joints requires about 100% more than vaporization	13	27.08%
smoking joints requires about 200% or more than vaporization	3	6.25%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

06-05-2007, 07:44 PM	#18
comet New Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 11 Grams: 800.22 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	I already have like 10 of them thanks. I have tried them all just about and if not I will. See my other posts for the lists of vapes I do own and use.. Thanks Bro for the offer! __________________ ~coMet~

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
CHALLENGE: Prove your existence	Z3BR0X	Philosophy	98	09-18-2008 10:31 PM
curious	waffen2112	Urine Testing	1	11-28-2006 09:42 PM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate View Forum Leaders Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read

12-04-2006, 07:59 PM	#11
Itzamna Jr. Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,493 Grams: 1,041.10 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	my experiences with vaporizors is that there is more THC and the high is more upidy, yet fades faster; therefore i'd say its equal

Remove Advertisements Marijuana.com Sponsor
Marijuana.com Advertisement	<a rel='nofollow' href='http://adserver.marijuana.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=a78e9dba&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://adserver.marijuana.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=6&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=a78e9dba' border='0' alt='' /></a>

12-04-2006, 08:00 PM	#12
THC Fiend Wonko the Sane Tournaments Won: 1 Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 2,431 Grams: 6,585.65 Groans: 6 Groaned at 11 Times in 6 Posts Thanks: 147 Thanked 277 Times in 173 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	There are two sides to this debate. The first side says that vaping is more efficient. The second side says that every smoking tool will give you a completely different high, and therefore, comparing a vape to any other tool is like comparing apples and oranges, or like comparing tom cruise with something that isn't a douche. It's just impossible

12-04-2006, 08:09 PM	#13
IIDX Jr. Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 279 Grams: 1,736.15 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts Thanks: 1 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	The point I'm at right now is that I bong hit every night essentially...a couple good bong hits every few hours. If I put say 0.2 or 0.3 in a vape I can get ripped quite hard, but if I put that in a bong it's just a strong buzz...I find vape and bong combo the best though....that just wrecks me.

12-04-2006, 08:22 PM	#14
t-1000 Sr. Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 765 Grams: 4,846.36 Groans: 2 Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post Thanks: 39 Thanked 69 Times in 46 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	the simple fact is, optimal vaping will provide better results than optimal smoking Put well ground bud into a volcano and that will be as good as it gets. Grinding more will expose as much material as possible, and a constant stream of properly heated air will suck almost all the THC out into the bag. Condensation is negligable. and you can always cook the leftovers for the CBNs or make hash oil or something

06-05-2007, 06:11 PM	#16
comet New Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 11 Grams: 800.22 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	They are both different. I think I also get high from the smoke itself from a bong rip. Usually for me big bing and then volcano to keep it all even. Then I am covering all bases. I think I get just as ripped but it is different with each method. With vaping I can save the duff and make food with it. With my burning I cannot. Positive and Negs for both. coMet

06-05-2007, 07:41 PM	#17
Purpose420 Jr. Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 247 Grams: 167.57 Groans: 1 Groaned at 15 Times in 10 Posts Thanks: 15 Thanked 39 Times in 27 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	First off you need to buy a quality vaporizer, I realize vaporizers are pricey but I would gladly set you up with a world class vaporizer at a very nice price I've been vaping since September and the results to me are astounding.

06-05-2007, 07:50 PM	#19
Purpose420 Jr. Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 247 Grams: 167.57 Groans: 1 Groaned at 15 Times in 10 Posts Thanks: 15 Thanked 39 Times in 27 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	Have you any from the vaporstore?

06-05-2007, 07:52 PM	#20
comet New Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 11 Grams: 800.22 Groans: 0 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Stock Portfolio Total Value: 0.000 Gain/Loss: 0.000%	I have see my list that is where I get most of them from. It sounded like you worked for them saying World Class Vaporizers. Glad to see you are suporting them.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Marijuana.com

Hot Products: