The other day I had an (un)interesting encounter. I had someone who had very obviously never even glanced at the Big Bang theory not ask me, but TELL me, that it states something comes from nothing. It doesn't and never has. They were just echoing the words of someone else, who was echoing the words of.... none of whom had ever even bothered to look to see if they were right or not. They just assumed. Except for those who have been corrected and still repeat it. Them, they lie. I see that type of thing in debates all the time. That science says we come from monkeys (no, common ancestor), that one species just pops fully formed from another (huh? Where do they get this garbage?), that it has something to do with lightening and a mud puddle (?? The only book I'm aware of that claims we were made from mud is the bible), and so on. One BS claim that science has never made after another and them expecting that we should have to defend things which they assume rather than the actual theories which science presents. So, I thought it worthwhile to share a vid where someone shares the reasons why they are not a creationist. They examine the claims in detail and shoot them down one by one. Can you argue them? Would you care to? www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5Tg67YMHMw The point? No, it's not that he's got your claims right and that much should be obvious. The point is that if you want to argue with someones position you should at LEAST have the self respect to learn what their actual position is instead of just dumping loads of assumptions and lies at them then expecting them to defend against your fantasies instead of their actual positions. If you don't have the self respect to at least learn the basics before you tell them it's wrong, then don't get offended when we point and laugh.