Go Back   Marijuana.com > Drug Testing > Urine Testing
Register FAQ Gaming VB Image Host Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2006, 08:03 AM   #1
WeedLover35
New Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 52
Grams: 915.50
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
WeedLover35 has begun their Karma Journey
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Question need help

does anyone know if a person uses quick fix to pass a randon drug test at a work place then a month later someone calls and tells the plant manager that quick fix was used , you think they will demand a observed test or think they will not take a persons word being here-say. thanks if anyone can answer this question.


weedlover35
WeedLover35 is offline Award WeedLover35 Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Old 10-29-2006, 11:26 PM   #2
Sec
Super Moderator
 
Sec's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,377
Grams: 42,654.28
Groans: 16
Groaned at 30 Times in 25 Posts
Sec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From ReputationitisSec Suffers From Reputationitis
Thanks: 698
Thanked 1,574 Times in 972 Posts

Stock Portfolio
Total Value: 0.000
Gain/Loss: 0.000%
Default

What you are really asking about would be considered "reasonable Suspicion". To be tested for a reasonable suspicion (or "for Cause"), a supervisor must observe specific articuable behaviors, smells, speech mannerisms, etc... At least two supervisors, trained in reasonable suspicion must actually see themselves, and document your behavior. The word of a co-worker cannot be considered in the determination for whether you are given a reasonable suspicion test.

That is how it is supposed to be done. That doesn't guarantee that it is done correctly in your company. An accusation is not proof. It should be the responsibility of the accuser to be able to back up the accusation with proof; it should not be up to you to prove your innocence during a reasonable suspicion test. You might want to abstain just in case the worst case scenario comes to life, at least until you know how this will all come out.
Sec is offline Award Sec Grams  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Marijuana.com Sponsor
Advertisement
 
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02 AM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52