Marijuana.com

Drop_That

Saw this linked to from NORML's site. Basically, a breakdown of detection times from the prosecution side. Not a guarantee of detectability (or lack thereof) in every specific case, but there's some interesting science to read about here.

http://www.ndci.org/NDCIR%20VI.pdf

Tell me if this is a repost...AND check out my other thread, if you are so KIND.

http://www.marijuana.com/urine-testi...ding-test.html

 

vern

Usually people who need to know detection times aren't going to read 125 pages to see if they are clean. I'm not saying what you posted is bad or anything, maybe just a bit to long. Making a post is much easier, I'd like to think we have a pretty solid drug testing squad here, so someone should be able to give advice.

__________________
Please read the posting guidelines
Looking for something? Try a Search
NORML State by state MJ laws
MJ.com Grams explained

Buzzby

If you would summarize the results in table form and post it in this thread, it would make the information much more accessible to people who just need the results, not the whole methodology.

__________________

Drop_That

For the stoners in the audience, the most impt tables are on pages 38 and 58. Basically, the court system is debunking a 30+ day detection period following a cleanout period. The document is indexed and it's also useful for anyone who may be a 1 or 2 time offender to read the first section regarding expungement and its relative lack of use by defendants. See next post to help those with short term memory or concentration loss.

Drop_That

Based upon recent scientific evidence, at the 50 ng/mL cutoff concentration for the detection of cannabinoids in urine (using the currently available laboratory-based screening methods) it would be unlikely for an individual to produce a positive urine drug test result for longer than 10 days after the last smoking episode. Although there are no scientific cannabinoid elimination studies on chronic users using non-instrumented testing devices, one would assume that if the on-site devices are properly calibrated at the 50 ng/mL cutoff level the detection guidance would be the same. At the 20 ng/mL cutoff concentration for the detection of cannabinoids in urine (using the currently available laboratory-based screening methods) it would be uncommon for an individual to produce a positive urine drug test result longer than 21 days after the last smoking episode. For occasional marijuana use (or single event usage), at the 50 ng/mL cutoff level, it would be unusual for the detection of cannabinoids in urine to extend beyond 3-4 days following the smoking episode (using the currently available laboratory-based screening methods or the currently available on-site THC detection devices). At the 20 ng/mL cutoff for cannabinoids, positive urine drug test results for the single event marijuana use would not be expected to be longer than 7 days.

 

Drop_That

And, from page 35:

rts in their decision making process. An extensive evaluation of marijuana elimination research is presented and cannabinoid detection window guidance is offered. Recent scientific literature indicates that it is uncommon for occasional marijuana smokers to test positive for cannabinoids in urine for longer than seven days using standard cutoff concentrations. Following smoking cessation, chronic smokers would not be expected to remain positive for longer than 21 days, even when using the 20 ng/mL cannabinoid cutoff. While longer detection times have been documented in research studies, these prolonged elimination findings represent uncommon occurrences and should not be used as exculpatory evidence in the majority of case adjudications.****


COMMENT
>>Now, this obviously does not fit with the anecdotal evidence on this site, EXCEPT that the "expected" outcomes are in line. The "system" is not saying that it's impossible to be positive given the cutoffs & times above, but this is what they expect and communicate to their adjudication teams.

What does this mean?

That it's possible to beat a test BUT if you fail, the explanations may be harder to pass off ("but it's been 6 weeks since I smoked").

For me, it's interesting to see the science out there and know what the other side is seeing, too - know your enemy and all that. Cheers.