| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Gaming | VB Image Host | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Herbal Alchemist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,551
Grams: 43,051.71 Groans: 28
Groaned at 9 Times in 9 Posts
Thanks: 1,990
Thanked 1,896 Times in 937 Posts
| **Provided by NORML Latest Marijuana Smoke Warnings Could Be Mitigated By Vaporization Washington, DC: The results of a recent Canadian study identifying the presence of various respiratory pollutants in marijuana smoke should be seen as an opportunity to better educate cannabis consumers about ways to mitigate the health risks associated with smoking, NORML Senior Policy Analyst Paul Armentano said today. The study, which will appear in the forthcoming issue of the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology, reports that greater concentrations of certain respiratory irritants such as ammonia, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and various aromatic amines (nitrogen-related chemicals) are produced during the combustion of marijuana than during the smoking of tobacco. (Investigators speculated that the presence of each of these chemicals was likely due to Health Canada’s use of high-nitrate fertilizer when cultivating cannabis.) By contrast, investigators also reported that mainstream marijuana smoke contained lower levels of selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons compared to tobacco. Exposure to certain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons has been associated with increased cancer risk in animals and is suspected to play a in role in the proliferation of various human cancers, such as breast cancer and lung cancer. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines, arsenic, and lead were not present in marijuana smoke, investigators noted. Armentano said that many of the unwanted chemicals contained in marijuana smoke, including HCN and many polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, may be reduced or eliminated by engaging in vaporization rather than smoking. “By heating marijuana to a temperature where active cannabis vapors form, but below the point of combustion, consumers significantly reduce their intake of gaseous combustion toxins, including carbon monoxide,” he said. Most recently, investigators at San Francisco General Hospital reported in the journal Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics that the "vaporization of marijuana does not result in exposure to combustion gases, ... and is preferred by most subjects compared to marijuana cigarette." A previous clinical trial published in 2006 in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences reported that vaporization is "safe and effective" cannabinoid delivery system that "avoid[s] the respiratory disadvantages of smoking.” Armentano also affirmed that cannabis smoking is not positively associated with cancers of the lung, mouth, or upper aerodigestive tract (e.g., pharynx, larynx, or esophagus). In 2006, the results of the largest case-controlled study ever to investigate the respiratory effects of marijuana smoking reported that pot use was not associated with cancer, even among subjects who reported smoking more than 22,000 joints over their lifetime. "While smoking cannabis may pose some minor respiratory risks to the user, these health risks are far less than those posed by tobacco smoking and may be significantly mitigated by engaging in vaporization as an alternative to smoking," Armentano concluded. "Unfortunately, cannabis prohibition greatly limits consumers’ access to such devices and impedes technological advancements in this area – subjecting users to respiratory risks that they would otherwise avoid." For more information, please contact Paul Armentano, NORML Senior Policy Analyst, at: paul@norml.org. Full text of the study, “A comparison of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco cigarette smoke produced under two machine smoking conditions,” appears online (ahead of print) at: A Comparison of Mainstream and Sidestream Marijuana and Tobacco Cigarette Smoke Produced under Two Machine Smoking Conditions.
__________________ "Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth."-John F. Kennedy R.O.A.R-Reach Out. Act. Respond. Disability is a matter of perception. If you can do just one thing well, you're needed by someone. - Martina Navratilova You can lead Deeter to water, but you can't make her drink. |
| | |
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Vicki For This Useful Post: | 5drive (12-21-2007), Sofa King (12-21-2007), SpiralArchitect (12-21-2007), sterbo (12-21-2007), vern (12-21-2007) |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 |
| Slacker ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,161
Grams: 5,425.67 Groans: 5
Groaned at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 269
Thanked 594 Times in 410 Posts
| Great info Vicki. Too bad it won't be widely published. Myths and lies will continue to prevail. ![]() |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to 5drive For This Useful Post: | Vicki (12-21-2007) |
| | #3 |
| Sr. Member Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 594
Grams: 3,238.87 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 7
Thanked 34 Times in 17 Posts
| Yea and I'm wondering if they are truly talking about Tobacco in it's raw form, before it becomes cigarette tobacco. You know they are always trying to pull a fast one. Here they could be talking about Cannabis has more ammonia than a raw tobacco plant that some people do still smoke and and not really comparing it to fully process commercial tobacco(with added active ingredients). I'm not saying thats what they are doing but they are using the word Tobacco which has wide meaning compared to the term cigarette as it's generally known(commercial). Some people even use the term Marijuana Cigarette but it has no meaning regarding the commercial aspect, same with Tobacco Cigarette doesn't necessarily mean commercial grade cigarette. They could slip the term Tobacco Cigarette in knowing most will think what you buy at the store then later say, Oh we were talking about the raw form of Cannabis VS the Raw form of Tobacco. I'm no longer willing to give them benefit of the doubt, Make it clear.
__________________ I only smoke legal herbs, when I come to these forums and discuss things like smoking and the high one gets I'm referring to the feeling I get from legal herbs and have no information on what others are smokeing or reffering to. I don't smoke marijuana but do enjoy discussing and talking about legal herbs and the high from different legal smoking methods and all my post should be viewed in that light. Last edited by SuperTorch : 12-21-2007 at 08:06 PM. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| New Member Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 89
Grams: 1,898.92 Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
| The Canadian study is also flawed because while it is true the mj smoke has a lot of carcinogens compared to tobacco, it also has THC which is actually a cancer fighter, which is why there is no real link between marijuana and cancer. Marijuana Facts - Cancer - A Little Bit About Nothin' Marijuana Compound May Fight Lung Cancer - Forbes.com Heavy marijuana use not linked to lung cancer |
| | |
| Marijuana.com Sponsor | |
Advertisement | |